2025-26 regular season · December 2, 2025
No betting line for this game, so there is no before-puck-drop or fresh-game number.
Bruins at Red Wings, Dec 2, 2025: who deserved to win?
The Red Wings beat the Bruins 5–4, and the replays lean their way: with the same day's form, they win 6 of 10.
The biggest swing (P1, 13:08 left): James van Riemsdyk scored on a wrist shot from 15 feet, worth 14 points of win probability to the Red Wings.
Final
| 4 | |
| 5 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +38 Red Wings lucky · −38 Bruins
Each team’s own shots from this game, resampled into new games 4,000 times, each a goal at its chance, with the power plays the penalties gave and the pulled goalie at the end: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Bruins win 4, Red Wings win 6.
- 1 BOS 4 DET 1
- 2 BOS 4 DET 2
- 3 BOS 4 DET 3
- 4 BOS 6 DET 5
- 5 BOS 3 DET 4
- 6 BOS 1 DET 2
- 7 BOS 1 DET 3
- 8 BOS 2 DET 5
- 9 BOS 1 DET 4
- 10 BOS 1 DET 6
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before puck drop
No closing line for this game.
Same teams, fresh game
Needs the closing line, which this game has not got.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every shot redrawn at its chance, overtime and the shootout replayed as near coin flips; the shots themselves and every call fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000.2 replays ended
Bruins win 38% of them, Red Wings 62%. The line is what actually happened: Red Wings by 1.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Bruins by 3+ | 11.3% |
| Bruins by 2 | 7.4% |
| Bruins by 1 | 19.1% |
| Red Wings by 1 | 18.7% |
| Red Wings by 2 | 11.3% |
| Red Wings by 3+ | 32.2% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A post hit in a blowout counts for nothing; the same post with a minute left in a tie game can be most of a win.
| Shooting | Unblocked attempts | Goals | Expected goals | Above expected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49 | 4 | 3.08 | +0.92 | |
| 44 | 5 | 3.46 | +1.54 |
Regulation with both goalies in. Expected goals: our model of each shot’s chance from where and how it was taken (distance, angle, shot type, rebound, rush, strength), adjusted for the shooter’s and the goalie’s records. A team above expected finished better or met a weaker night in goal; 75% of the gap counts as luck (why that share).
Calls
Every penalty that put a team on the power play, and every goal taken off the board on review, with what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment. Calls don’t count toward luck by default: who draws penalties repeats from game to game like a skill (how calls are valued). Switch them on below.
| When | Call | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| P2 11:40 | Roughing on the Red Wings (Simon Edvinsson): 2 minutes on the power play | +1% BOS |
| P3 16:36 | Holding on the Bruins (Hampus Lindholm): 2 minutes on the power play | +2% DET |
| P3 12:13 | Roughing on the Bruins (Nikita Zadorov): 2 minutes on the power play | +1% DET |
| P3 6:33 | Slashing on the Bruins (Mark Kastelic): 2 minutes on the power play | 0% DET |
| P3 5:55 | High sticking on the Red Wings (Moritz Seider): 2 minutes on the power play | 0% BOS |
When it happened
Red Wings’ chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | P1 13:08 | James van Riemsdyk scored on a wrist shot from 15 feetShooting · 11% chance | +14% DET | – |
| 2 | P1 6:11 | Moritz Seider scored on a wrist shot from 45 feetShooting · 2% chance | +13% DET | – |
| 3 | P2 18:25 | Alex DeBrincat scored on a snap shot from 32 feetShooting · 9% chance | +8% DET | – |
| 4 | P2 8:51 | Jonathan Aspirot scored on a slap shot from 56 feetShooting · 2% chance | +7% BOS | – |
| 5 | P2 4:22 | Alex Steeves scored on a snap shot from 15 feetShooting · 12% chance | +13% BOS | – |
| 6 | P2 4:09 | Elias Lindholm’s slap shot from 22 feet was savedShooting · 19% chance | +4% DET | – |
| 7 | P2 3:45 | Ben Chiarot scored on a snap shot from 23 feetShooting · 16% chance | +13% DET | – |
| 8 | P3 16:05 | Lucas Raymond scored on a slap shot from 21 feetShooting · 20% chance | +4% DET | – |
Adjust the assumptions
Think finishing is more skill than we do, or that the calls were luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Bruins 43% · Red Wings 57%
- Final margin
- Red Wings by 1
- Luck in goals
- 0.5 for the Red Wings
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Red Wings by 0.5
- Replay with same day's form
- Bruins 38% · Red Wings 62% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play from the NHL via fastRhockey; expected goals, in-game win probability and the replays are our own models, fitted on every game since 2018-19 (methodology and validation). Blocked shots aren’t replayed (their location is the block’s, not the shot’s). No betting line for this game, so there is no before-puck-drop or fresh-game number.
More from week 9, 2025-26
- Blues at Senators Dec 6, 2025 · STL 2–1 · replay 29% for the winner
- Islanders at Lightning Dec 6, 2025 · NYI 2–0 · replay 34% for the winner
- Lightning at Islanders Dec 2, 2025 · NYI 2–1 · replay 34% for the winner
- Red Wings at Blue Jackets Dec 4, 2025 · CBJ 6–5 SO · replay 36% for the winner
- Sabres at Jets Dec 5, 2025 · WPG 4–1 · replay 38% for the winner
- Penguins at Lightning Dec 4, 2025 · PIT 4–3 · replay 40% for the winner
- Blues at Bruins Dec 4, 2025 · BOS 5–2 · replay 42% for the winner
- Maple Leafs at Hurricanes Dec 4, 2025 · TOR 5–1 · replay 42% for the winner
- Red Wings at Kraken Dec 6, 2025 · DET 4–3 · replay 47% for the winner
- Predators at Panthers Dec 4, 2025 · NSH 2–1 OT · replay 47% for the winner
- Rangers at Senators Dec 4, 2025 · NYR 4–2 · replay 51% for the winner
- Blues at Canadiens Dec 7, 2025 · STL 4–3 · replay 51% for the winner