2025-26 regular season · January 25, 2026 · OT
No betting line for this game, so there is no before-puck-drop or fresh-game number.
Ducks at Flames, Jan 25, 2026: who deserved to win?
The Ducks beat the Flames 4–3, but the replays lean toward the Flames: they take 7 of 10 with the same day's form. Luck ran their way: overtime alone was worth 51 points of win probability to the Ducks.
The game turned on a luck play (OT): the Ducks won in overtime, worth 51 points of win probability to the Ducks.
Final (OT)
| 4 | |
| 3 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +65 Ducks very lucky · −65 Flames
Each team’s own shots from this game, resampled into new games 4,000 times, each a goal at its chance, with the power plays the penalties gave and the pulled goalie at the end: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Ducks win 3, Flames win 7.
- 1 ANA 3 CGY 1
- 2 ANA 4 CGY 3
- 3 ANA 3 CGY 2
- 4 ANA 1 CGY 2
- 5 ANA 1 CGY 2
- 6 ANA 2 CGY 4
- 7 ANA 0 CGY 3
- 8 ANA 1 CGY 4
- 9 ANA 1 CGY 5
- 10 ANA 0 CGY 5
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before puck drop
No closing line for this game.
Same teams, fresh game
Needs the closing line, which this game has not got.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every shot redrawn at its chance, overtime and the shootout replayed as near coin flips; the shots themselves and every call fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 3,999.8 replays ended
Ducks win 35% of them, Flames 65%. The line is what actually happened: Ducks by 1.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Ducks by 3+ | 7.7% |
| Ducks by 2 | 6.7% |
| Ducks by 1 | 20.2% |
| Flames by 1 | 22.2% |
| Flames by 2 | 12.3% |
| Flames by 3+ | 30.8% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A post hit in a blowout counts for nothing; the same post with a minute left in a tie game can be most of a win.
| Shooting | Unblocked attempts | Goals | Expected goals | Above expected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 37 | 3 | 1.73 | +1.27 | |
| 47 | 3 | 2.82 | +0.18 |
Regulation with both goalies in. Expected goals: our model of each shot’s chance from where and how it was taken (distance, angle, shot type, rebound, rush, strength), adjusted for the shooter’s and the goalie’s records. A team above expected finished better or met a weaker night in goal; 75% of the gap counts as luck (why that share).
Calls
Every penalty that put a team on the power play, and every goal taken off the board on review, with what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment. Calls don’t count toward luck by default: who draws penalties repeats from game to game like a skill (how calls are valued). Switch them on below.
| When | Call | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| P1 2:21 | High sticking on the Flames (Yan Kuznetsov): 2 minutes on the power play | +3% ANA |
| P2 1:15 | Holding on the Flames (Justin Kirkland): 2 minutes on the power play | +6% ANA |
| P3 16:23 | Slashing on the Ducks (Drew Helleson): 2 minutes on the power play | +6% CGY |
When it happened
Flames’ chance of winning
As low as 0% and as high as 86%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | P1 13:43 | Jonathan Huberdeau scored on a wrist shot from 6 feetShooting · 20% chance | +13% CGY | – |
| 2 | P1 12:04 | Hunter Brzustewicz scored on a wrist shot from 47 feetShooting · 2% chance | +13% CGY | – |
| 3 | P2 16:38 | Beckett Sennecke scored on a snap shot from 18 feetShooting · 15% chance | +12% ANA | – |
| 4 | P2 7:19 | Beckett Sennecke scored on a wrist shot from 10 feetShooting · 9% chance | +20% ANA | – |
| 5 | P3 15:53 | Nazem Kadri missed the net with a deflected shot from 3 feetShooting · 24% chance | +6% ANA | – |
| 6 | P3 15:10 | Matt Coronato scored on a wrist shot from 6 feetShooting · 17% chance | +23% CGY | – |
| 7 | P3 6:52 | Chris Kreider scored on a snap shot from 26 feetShooting · 11% chance | +31% ANA | – |
| 8 | OT | The game turned hereThe Ducks won in overtimeOvertime · overtime is close to a coin flip | +51% ANA | – |
Adjust the assumptions
Think finishing is more skill than we do, or that the calls were luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Ducks 30% · Flames 70%
- Final margin
- Ducks by 1
- Luck in goals
- 1.8 for the Ducks
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Flames by 0.8
- Replay with same day's form
- Ducks 35% · Flames 65% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play from the NHL via fastRhockey; expected goals, in-game win probability and the replays are our own models, fitted on every game since 2018-19 (methodology and validation). Blocked shots aren’t replayed (their location is the block’s, not the shot’s). No betting line for this game, so there is no before-puck-drop or fresh-game number.
More from week 16, 2025-26
- Ducks at Avalanche Jan 21, 2026 · ANA 2–1 SO · replay 17% for the winner
- Golden Knights at Bruins Jan 22, 2026 · BOS 4–3 · replay 28% for the winner
- Flyers at Golden Knights Jan 19, 2026 · PHI 2–1 · replay 35% for the winner
- Devils at Kraken Jan 25, 2026 · SEA 4–2 · replay 39% for the winner
- Capitals at Canucks Jan 21, 2026 · VAN 4–3 · replay 39% for the winner
- Islanders at Kraken Jan 21, 2026 · SEA 4–1 · replay 45% for the winner
- Devils at Oilers Jan 20, 2026 · NJD 2–1 · replay 46% for the winner
- Penguins at Canucks Jan 25, 2026 · PIT 3–2 · replay 52% for the winner
- Rangers at Kings Jan 20, 2026 · LAK 4–3 · replay 52% for the winner
- Penguins at Oilers Jan 22, 2026 · PIT 6–2 · replay 53% for the winner
- Sharks at Panthers Jan 19, 2026 · SJS 4–1 · replay 53% for the winner
- Penguins at Kraken Jan 19, 2026 · PIT 6–3 · replay 53% for the winner