2025-26 regular season · February 27, 2026 · OT
No betting line for this game, so there is no before-puck-drop or fresh-game number.
Jets at Ducks, Feb 27, 2026: who deserved to win?
The Ducks beat the Jets 5–4, but the replays call it close to a coin flip: with the way both teams played, the Ducks win 5 of 10. Luck ran their way: overtime alone was worth 49 points of win probability to the Ducks.
The biggest swing (OT): the Ducks won in overtime, worth 49 points of win probability to the Ducks.
Final (OT)
| 4 | |
| 5 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +51 Ducks lucky · −51 Jets
Each team’s own shots from this game, resampled into new games 4,000 times, each a goal at its chance, with the power plays the penalties gave and the pulled goalie at the end: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Jets win 5, Ducks win 5.
- 1 WPG 6 ANA 2
- 2 WPG 9 ANA 6
- 3 WPG 4 ANA 2
- 4 WPG 5 ANA 4
- 5 WPG 5 ANA 4
- 6 WPG 6 ANA 7
- 7 WPG 5 ANA 6
- 8 WPG 2 ANA 4
- 9 WPG 3 ANA 6
- 10 WPG 1 ANA 6
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before puck drop
No closing line for this game.
Same teams, fresh game
Needs the closing line, which this game has not got.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every shot redrawn at its chance, overtime and the shootout replayed as near coin flips; the shots themselves and every call fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Jets win 51% of them, Ducks 49%. The line is what actually happened: Ducks by 1.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Jets by 3+ | 23.1% |
| Jets by 2 | 8.8% |
| Jets by 1 | 18.6% |
| Ducks by 1 | 18.7% |
| Ducks by 2 | 9.2% |
| Ducks by 3+ | 21.6% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A post hit in a blowout counts for nothing; the same post with a minute left in a tie game can be most of a win.
| Shooting | Unblocked attempts | Goals | Expected goals | Above expected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 | 4 | 4.23 | −0.23 | |
| 57 | 4 | 4.19 | −0.19 |
Regulation with both goalies in. Expected goals: our model of each shot’s chance from where and how it was taken (distance, angle, shot type, rebound, rush, strength), adjusted for the shooter’s and the goalie’s records. A team above expected finished better or met a weaker night in goal; 75% of the gap counts as luck (why that share).
Calls
Every penalty that put a team on the power play, and every goal taken off the board on review, with what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment. Calls don’t count toward luck by default: who draws penalties repeats from game to game like a skill (how calls are valued). Switch them on below.
| When | Call | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| P1 15:09 | Holding on the Jets (Logan Stanley): 2 minutes on the power play | +4% ANA |
| P1 5:51 | Tripping on the Ducks (Olen Zellweger): 2 minutes on the power play | +4% WPG |
| P2 18:22 | Holding on the Ducks (Pavel Mintyukov): 2 minutes on the power play | +4% WPG |
| P2 16:30 | Delaying game puck over glass on the Ducks (Olen Zellweger): 2 minutes on the power play | +3% WPG |
| P3 14:24 | Tripping on the Jets (Tanner Pearson): 2 minutes on the power play | +2% ANA |
| P3 5:22 | Hooking on the Ducks (Tim Washe): 2 minutes on the power play | +9% WPG |
When it happened
Ducks’ chance of winning
As low as 7% and as high as 100%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | P1 18:36 | Alex Iafallo scored on a snap shot from 40 feetShooting · 3% chance | +15% WPG | – |
| 2 | P2 17:35 | Gabriel Vilardi scored on a snap shot from 20 feetShooting · 28% chance | +11% WPG | – |
| 3 | P2 0:41 | Jacob Trouba scored on a slap shot from 64 feetShooting · 1% chance | +16% ANA | – |
| 4 | P3 18:33 | Elias Salomonsson scored on a snap shot from 40 feetShooting · 4% chance | +16% WPG | – |
| 5 | P3 10:01 | Pavel Mintyukov scored on a snap shot from 16 feetShooting · 15% chance | +28% ANA | – |
| 6 | P3 3:10 | Ryan Poehling scored on a snap shot from 17 feetShooting · 12% chance | +36% ANA | – |
| 7 | P3 1:22 | Kyle Connor scored on a wrist shot from 19 feetShooting · 16% chance | +37% WPG | – |
| 8 | OT | The Ducks won in overtimeOvertime · overtime is close to a coin flip | +49% ANA | – |
Adjust the assumptions
Think finishing is more skill than we do, or that the calls were luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Jets 50% · Ducks 50%
- Final margin
- Ducks by 1
- Luck in goals
- 1.0 for the Ducks
- Luck-adjusted margin
- even
- Replay with same day's form
- Jets 51% · Ducks 49% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play from the NHL via fastRhockey; expected goals, in-game win probability and the replays are our own models, fitted on every game since 2018-19 (methodology and validation). Blocked shots aren’t replayed (their location is the block’s, not the shot’s). No betting line for this game, so there is no before-puck-drop or fresh-game number.
More from week 21, 2025-26
- Blackhawks at Predators Feb 26, 2026 · NSH 4–2 · replay 38% for the winner
- Oilers at Ducks Feb 25, 2026 · ANA 6–5 · replay 43% for the winner
- Blues at Wild Mar 1, 2026 · STL 3–1 · replay 44% for the winner
- Golden Knights at Capitals Feb 27, 2026 · WSH 3–2 · replay 46% for the winner
- Flames at Sharks Feb 26, 2026 · CGY 4–1 · replay 47% for the winner
- Avalanche at Mammoth Feb 25, 2026 · COL 4–2 · replay 47% for the winner
- Blackhawks at Mammoth Mar 1, 2026 · CHI 4–0 · replay 47% for the winner
- Flames at Ducks Mar 1, 2026 · ANA 3–2 SO · replay 49% for the winner
- Predators at Stars Feb 28, 2026 · DAL 3–2 OT · replay 54% for the winner
- Kraken at Blues Feb 26, 2026 · STL 5–1 · replay 54% for the winner
- Flames at Kings Feb 28, 2026 · LAK 2–0 · replay 54% for the winner
- Golden Knights at Kings Feb 25, 2026 · VGK 6–4 · replay 54% for the winner