2026-27 regular season · October 19, 2026
No betting line for this game, so there is no before-puck-drop or fresh-game number.
Ducks at Rangers, Oct 19, 2026: who deserved to win?
The Rangers beat the Ducks 5–2, and the replays lean their way: with the same day's form, they win 7 of 10.
The biggest swing (P1, 18:42 left): Sean Durzi scored on a snap shot from 64 feet, worth 15 points of win probability to the Rangers.
Final
 Anaheim Ducks | 2 |
|---|---|
 New York Rangers | 5 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +31 Rangers lucky · −31 Ducks
Each team’s own shots from this game, resampled into new games 4,000 times, each a goal at its chance, with the power plays the penalties gave and the pulled goalie at the end: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Ducks win 3, Rangers win 7.
- 1 ANA 5 NYR 2
- 2 ANA 7 NYR 6
- 3 ANA 5 NYR 4
- 4 ANA 4 NYR 5
- 5 ANA 3 NYR 4
- 6 ANA 2 NYR 4
- 7 ANA 3 NYR 6
- 8 ANA 3 NYR 7
- 9 ANA 3 NYR 8
- 10 ANA 1 NYR 7
Our prediction before puck drop
We had the Rangers by 0.3, 54% to win. The Rangers won by 3: the pick was right. The final margin was 2.7 goals from ours; 26% of games like this end further from the forecast than that.
Show as a table
| Outcome | Chance |
|---|---|
| Ducks win | 45.5% |
| Rangers win | 54.5% |
| Middle 50%: Ducks by 2 to Rangers by 2 | 50% |
| Middle 90%: Ducks by 4 to Rangers by 4 | 90% |
| Middle 95%: Ducks by 4 to Rangers by 5 | 95% |
| Exactly Rangers by 1 | 21.6% |
| Exactly Ducks by 1 | 19.4% |
| Exactly Rangers by 3 | 13.1% |
| Exactly Rangers by 2 | 10.4% |
| Exactly Ducks by 3 | 10.1% |
Most of the distance between a forecast and a final score is luck: a hot goalie, a post or a deflection moves a hockey score more than anything known before the game. Made Mon, Oct 19, 4:25 pm ET and frozen at puck drop. How our predictions have done
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before puck drop
No closing line for this game.
Same teams, fresh game
Needs the closing line, which this game has not got.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every shot redrawn at its chance, overtime and the shootout replayed as near coin flips; the shots themselves and every call fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 3,999.9 replays ended
Ducks win 31% of them, Rangers 69%. The line is what actually happened: Rangers by 3.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Ducks by 3+ | 8.9% |
| Ducks by 2 | 5.4% |
| Ducks by 1 | 16.4% |
| Rangers by 1 | 15.6% |
| Rangers by 2 | 9.6% |
| Rangers by 3+ | 44.0% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A post hit in a blowout counts for nothing; the same post with a minute left in a tie game can be most of a win.
| Shooting | Unblocked attempts | Goals | Expected goals | Above expected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Ducks | 44 | 2 | 3.24 | −1.24 |
 Rangers | 42 | 5 | 4.76 | +0.24 |
Regulation with both goalies in. Expected goals: our model of each shot’s chance from where and how it was taken (distance, angle, shot type, rebound, rush, strength), adjusted for the shooter’s and the goalie’s records. A team above expected finished better or met a weaker night in goal; 75% of the gap counts as luck (why that share).
Calls
Every penalty that put a team on the power play, and every goal taken off the board on review, with what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment. Calls don’t count toward luck by default: who draws penalties repeats from game to game like a skill (how calls are valued). Switch them on below.
| When | Call | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| P1 17:37 | High sticking on the Ducks (Jeff Malott): 2 minutes on the power play | +3% NYR |
| P1 16:21 | Delaying game puck over glass on the Ducks (Nick Jensen): 2 minutes on the power play | +3% NYR |
| P1 12:52 | Holding on the Rangers (Alberts Smits): 2 minutes on the power play | +3% ANA |
| P2 16:08 | Tripping on the Ducks (Nikita Klepov): 2 minutes on the power play | +4% NYR |
| P2 2:57 | Holding on the Ducks (Nikita Klepov): 2 minutes on the power play | 0% NYR |
| P2 1:30 | Interference on the Rangers (Eeli Tolvanen): 2 minutes on the power play | 0% ANA |
| P3 6:02 | Tripping on the Rangers (Alberts Smits): 2 minutes on the power play | 0% ANA |
When it happened
Rangers’ chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | P1 18:42 | Sean Durzi scored on a snap shot from 64 feetShooting · 1% chance | +15% NYR | – |
| 2 | P1 11:27 | Mikael Granlund’s bat shot from 7 feet was savedShooting · 21% chance | +3% NYR | – |
| 3 | P1 8:10 | Leo Carlsson’s snap shot from 20 feet was savedShooting · 7% chanceAlex Killorn’s snap shot from 7 feet was savedShooting · 14% chance | +4% NYR | – |
| 4 | P1 4:06 | Pavel Dorofeyev’s snap shot from 7 feet was savedShooting · 28% chance | +4% ANA | – |
| 5 | P2 19:44 | Gabe Perreault’s snap shot from 6 feet was savedShooting · 29% chance | +4% ANA | – |
| 6 | P2 16:08 | Tripping on the Ducks (Nikita Klepov): 2 minutes on the power playPenalty calls | +4% NYR | – |
| 7 | P2 15:22 | J.T. Miller scored on a tip from 12 feetShooting · 10% chance | +13% NYR | – |
| 8 | P2 9:43 | Gabe Perreault scored on a snap shot from 3 feetShooting · 33% chance | +5% NYR | – |
Adjust the assumptions
Think finishing is more skill than we do, or that the calls were luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Ducks 18% · Rangers 82%
- Final margin
- Rangers by 3
- Luck in goals
- 1.1 for the Rangers
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Rangers by 1.9
- Replay with same day's form
- Ducks 31% · Rangers 69% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play from the NHL via fastRhockey; expected goals, in-game win probability and the replays are our own models, fitted on every game since 2018-19 (methodology and validation). Blocked shots aren’t replayed (their location is the block’s, not the shot’s). No betting line for this game, so there is no before-puck-drop or fresh-game number.
More from week 4, 2026-27
- Wild at Oilers Oct 20, 2026 · EDM 4–3 OT · replay 30% for the winner
- Sharks at Senators Oct 22, 2026 · SJS 6–2 · replay 30% for the winner
- Kings at Capitals Oct 20, 2026 · LAK 5–2 · replay 32% for the winner
- Wild at Flames Oct 22, 2026 · CGY 2–1 · replay 33% for the winner
- Lightning at Golden Knights Oct 20, 2026 · TBL 6–2 · replay 38% for the winner
- Mammoth at Kraken Oct 22, 2026 · SEA 5–3 · replay 40% for the winner
- Sharks at Canadiens Oct 20, 2026 · SJS 4–3 OT · replay 42% for the winner
- Maple Leafs at Blue Jackets Oct 20, 2026 · TOR 6–2 · replay 43% for the winner
- Golden Knights at Blue Jackets Oct 24, 2026 · CBJ 2–1 OT · replay 43% for the winner
- Red Wings at Flames Oct 24, 2026 · CGY 4–1 · replay 43% for the winner
- Maple Leafs at Oilers Oct 24, 2026 · TOR 7–2 · replay 45% for the winner
- Rangers at Senators Oct 24, 2026 · OTT 7–4 · replay 46% for the winner