2025-26 regular season · December 16, 2025
No betting line for this game, so there is no before-puck-drop or fresh-game number.
Flyers at Canadiens, Dec 16, 2025: who deserved to win?
The Flyers beat the Canadiens 4–1, but the replays call it close to a coin flip: with the way both teams played, the Flyers win 4 of 10. Luck ran their way: shooting alone was worth 21 points of win probability to the Flyers.
The biggest swing (P2, 13:34 left): Trevor Zegras scored on a snap shot from 17 feet, worth 17 points of win probability to the Flyers.
Final
| 4 | |
| 1 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +59 Flyers lucky · −59 Canadiens
Each team’s own shots from this game, resampled into new games 4,000 times, each a goal at its chance, with the power plays the penalties gave and the pulled goalie at the end: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Flyers win 4, Canadiens win 6.
- 1 PHI 4 MTL 1
- 2 PHI 4 MTL 2
- 3 PHI 3 MTL 2
- 4 PHI 4 MTL 3
- 5 PHI 2 MTL 3
- 6 PHI 2 MTL 3
- 7 PHI 1 MTL 3
- 8 PHI 2 MTL 5
- 9 PHI 0 MTL 3
- 10 PHI 2 MTL 7
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before puck drop
No closing line for this game.
Same teams, fresh game
Needs the closing line, which this game has not got.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every shot redrawn at its chance, overtime and the shootout replayed as near coin flips; the shots themselves and every call fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 3,999.8 replays ended
Flyers win 41% of them, Canadiens 59%. The line is what actually happened: Flyers by 3.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Flyers by 3+ | 11.4% |
| Flyers by 2 | 8.6% |
| Flyers by 1 | 21.3% |
| Canadiens by 1 | 22.3% |
| Canadiens by 2 | 11.7% |
| Canadiens by 3+ | 24.6% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A post hit in a blowout counts for nothing; the same post with a minute left in a tie game can be most of a win.
| Shooting | Unblocked attempts | Goals | Expected goals | Above expected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 | 3 | 2.05 | +0.95 | |
| 44 | 1 | 2.86 | −1.86 |
Regulation with both goalies in. Expected goals: our model of each shot’s chance from where and how it was taken (distance, angle, shot type, rebound, rush, strength), adjusted for the shooter’s and the goalie’s records. A team above expected finished better or met a weaker night in goal; 75% of the gap counts as luck (why that share).
Calls
Every penalty that put a team on the power play, and every goal taken off the board on review, with what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment. Calls don’t count toward luck by default: who draws penalties repeats from game to game like a skill (how calls are valued). Switch them on below.
| When | Call | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| P1 10:56 | Cross checking on the Canadiens (Ivan Demidov): 2 minutes on the power play | +4% PHI |
| P1 6:29 | Tripping on the Canadiens (Alexandre Carrier): 2 minutes on the power play | +4% PHI |
| P2 16:28 | Holding the stick on the Flyers (Sean Couturier): 2 minutes on the power play | +5% MTL |
| P3 6:09 | High sticking on the Canadiens (Brendan Gallagher): 2 minutes on the power play | +2% PHI |
When it happened
Canadiens’ chance of winning
As low as 0% and as high as 71%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | P1 9:45 | Sean Couturier’s snap shot from 7 feet was savedShooting · 27% chance | +5% MTL | – |
| 2 | P1 6:29 | Tripping on the Canadiens (Alexandre Carrier): 2 minutes on the power playPenalty calls | +4% PHI | – |
| 3 | P1 1:00 | Alexandre Texier scored on a snap shot from 26 feetShooting · 14% chance | +16% MTL | – |
| 4 | P1 0:21 | Carl Grundstrom scored on a snap shot from 19 feetShooting · 10% chance | +16% PHI | – |
| 5 | P2 16:28 | Holding the stick on the Flyers (Sean Couturier): 2 minutes on the power playPenalty calls | +5% MTL | – |
| 6 | P2 13:34 | Trevor Zegras scored on a snap shot from 17 feetShooting · 18% chance | +17% PHI | – |
| 7 | P2 0:50 | Bobby Brink scored on a snap shot from 18 feetShooting · 19% chance | +13% PHI | – |
| 8 | P3 19:23 | Zachary Bolduc’s snap shot from 5 feet was savedShooting · 29% chance | +5% PHI | – |
Adjust the assumptions
Think finishing is more skill than we do, or that the calls were luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Flyers 64% · Canadiens 36%
- Final margin
- Flyers by 3
- Luck in goals
- 2.5 for the Flyers
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Flyers by 0.5
- Replay with same day's form
- Flyers 41% · Canadiens 59% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play from the NHL via fastRhockey; expected goals, in-game win probability and the replays are our own models, fitted on every game since 2018-19 (methodology and validation). Blocked shots aren’t replayed (their location is the block’s, not the shot’s). No betting line for this game, so there is no before-puck-drop or fresh-game number.
More from week 11, 2025-26
- Capitals at Red Wings Dec 21, 2025 · DET 3–2 OT · replay 24% for the winner
- Canucks at Bruins Dec 20, 2025 · VAN 5–4 SO · replay 26% for the winner
- Kings at Lightning Dec 18, 2025 · LAK 2–1 · replay 30% for the winner
- Penguins at Canadiens Dec 20, 2025 · MTL 4–0 · replay 30% for the winner
- Sabres at Devils Dec 21, 2025 · BUF 3–1 · replay 35% for the winner
- Canucks at Rangers Dec 16, 2025 · VAN 3–0 · replay 37% for the winner
- Kings at Panthers Dec 17, 2025 · FLA 3–2 · replay 41% for the winner
- Devils at Mammoth Dec 19, 2025 · NJD 2–1 · replay 43% for the winner
- Maple Leafs at Stars Dec 21, 2025 · DAL 5–1 · replay 44% for the winner
- Ducks at Rangers Dec 15, 2025 · ANA 4–1 · replay 49% for the winner
- Mammoth at Bruins Dec 16, 2025 · BOS 4–1 · replay 49% for the winner
- Senators at Jets Dec 15, 2025 · OTT 3–2 OT · replay 50% for the winner