2025-26 regular season · December 20, 2025
No betting line for this game, so there is no before-puck-drop or fresh-game number.
Penguins at Canadiens, Dec 20, 2025: who deserved to win?
The Canadiens beat the Penguins 4–0, but the replays lean toward the Penguins: they take 7 of 10 with the same day's form. Luck ran their way: goaltending alone was worth 29 points of win probability to the Canadiens.
The biggest swing (P1, 3:19 left): Juraj Slafkovský scored on a snap shot from 21 feet, worth 14 points of win probability to the Canadiens.
Final
| 0 | |
| 4 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +70 Canadiens very lucky · −70 Penguins
Each team’s own shots from this game, resampled into new games 4,000 times, each a goal at its chance, with the power plays the penalties gave and the pulled goalie at the end: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Penguins win 7, Canadiens win 3.
- 1 PIT 6 MTL 0
- 2 PIT 6 MTL 2
- 3 PIT 3 MTL 0
- 4 PIT 6 MTL 3
- 5 PIT 3 MTL 0
- 6 PIT 6 MTL 5
- 7 PIT 7 MTL 6
- 8 PIT 3 MTL 4
- 9 PIT 3 MTL 4
- 10 PIT 1 MTL 4
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before puck drop
No closing line for this game.
Same teams, fresh game
Needs the closing line, which this game has not got.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every shot redrawn at its chance, overtime and the shootout replayed as near coin flips; the shots themselves and every call fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 3,999.9 replays ended
Penguins win 70% of them, Canadiens 30%. The line is what actually happened: Canadiens by 4.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Penguins by 3+ | 43.5% |
| Penguins by 2 | 10.8% |
| Penguins by 1 | 15.8% |
| Canadiens by 1 | 17.0% |
| Canadiens by 2 | 5.2% |
| Canadiens by 3+ | 7.7% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A post hit in a blowout counts for nothing; the same post with a minute left in a tie game can be most of a win.
| Shooting | Unblocked attempts | Goals | Expected goals | Above expected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52 | 0 | 4.57 | −4.57 | |
| 31 | 3 | 2.35 | +0.65 |
Regulation with both goalies in. Expected goals: our model of each shot’s chance from where and how it was taken (distance, angle, shot type, rebound, rush, strength), adjusted for the shooter’s and the goalie’s records. A team above expected finished better or met a weaker night in goal; 75% of the gap counts as luck (why that share).
Calls
Every penalty that put a team on the power play, and every goal taken off the board on review, with what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment. Calls don’t count toward luck by default: who draws penalties repeats from game to game like a skill (how calls are valued). Switch them on below.
| When | Call | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| P1 17:56 | Boarding on the Canadiens (Arber Xhekaj): 2 minutes on the power play | +4% PIT |
| P1 4:10 | Tripping on the Penguins (Kevin Hayes): 2 minutes on the power play | +4% MTL |
| P2 8:42 | Delaying game puck over glass on the Canadiens (Nick Suzuki): 2 minutes on the power play | +3% PIT |
| P3 11:31 | Cross checking on the Canadiens (Lane Hutson): 2 minutes on the power play | +1% PIT |
When it happened
Canadiens’ chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | P1 17:56 | Boarding on the Canadiens (Arber Xhekaj): 2 minutes on the power playPenalty calls | +4% PIT | – |
| 2 | P1 13:54 | Rickard Rakell missed the net with a snap shot from 19 feetShooting · 17% chance | +3% MTL | – |
| 3 | P1 4:10 | Tripping on the Penguins (Kevin Hayes): 2 minutes on the power playPenalty calls | +4% MTL | – |
| 4 | P1 3:19 | Juraj Slafkovský scored on a snap shot from 21 feetShooting · 21% chance | +14% MTL | – |
| 5 | P1 1:11 | Owen Beck scored on a snap shot from 34 feetShooting · 7% chance | +13% MTL | – |
| 6 | P2 19:10 | Connor Dewar’s snap shot from 8 feet was savedShooting · 21% chance | +3% MTL | – |
| 7 | P2 8:18 | Anthony Mantha missed the net with a snap shot from 8 feetShooting · 21% chance | +3% MTL | – |
| 8 | P2 7:46 | Josh Anderson scored on a snap shot from 23 feetShooting · 14% chance | +6% MTL | – |
Adjust the assumptions
Think finishing is more skill than we do, or that the calls were luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Penguins 14% · Canadiens 86%
- Final margin
- Canadiens by 4
- Luck in goals
- 1.6 for the Canadiens
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Canadiens by 2.4
- Replay with same day's form
- Penguins 70% · Canadiens 30% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play from the NHL via fastRhockey; expected goals, in-game win probability and the replays are our own models, fitted on every game since 2018-19 (methodology and validation). Blocked shots aren’t replayed (their location is the block’s, not the shot’s). No betting line for this game, so there is no before-puck-drop or fresh-game number.
More from week 11, 2025-26
- Capitals at Red Wings Dec 21, 2025 · DET 3–2 OT · replay 24% for the winner
- Canucks at Bruins Dec 20, 2025 · VAN 5–4 SO · replay 26% for the winner
- Kings at Lightning Dec 18, 2025 · LAK 2–1 · replay 30% for the winner
- Sabres at Devils Dec 21, 2025 · BUF 3–1 · replay 35% for the winner
- Canucks at Rangers Dec 16, 2025 · VAN 3–0 · replay 37% for the winner
- Kings at Panthers Dec 17, 2025 · FLA 3–2 · replay 41% for the winner
- Flyers at Canadiens Dec 16, 2025 · PHI 4–1 · replay 41% for the winner
- Devils at Mammoth Dec 19, 2025 · NJD 2–1 · replay 43% for the winner
- Maple Leafs at Stars Dec 21, 2025 · DAL 5–1 · replay 44% for the winner
- Ducks at Rangers Dec 15, 2025 · ANA 4–1 · replay 49% for the winner
- Mammoth at Bruins Dec 16, 2025 · BOS 4–1 · replay 49% for the winner
- Senators at Jets Dec 15, 2025 · OTT 3–2 OT · replay 50% for the winner