2025-26 regular season · December 21, 2025 · OT
No betting line for this game, so there is no before-puck-drop or fresh-game number.
Jets at Mammoth, Dec 21, 2025: who deserved to win?
The Mammoth beat the Jets 4–3, and the replays lean their way: with the same day's form, they win 7 of 10. The Jets had the bounces: goaltending alone was worth 18 points of win probability to the Jets.
The biggest swing (OT): the Mammoth won in overtime, worth 49 points of win probability to the Mammoth.
Final (OT)
| 3 | |
| 4 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +31 Mammoth lucky · −31 Jets
Each team’s own shots from this game, resampled into new games 4,000 times, each a goal at its chance, with the power plays the penalties gave and the pulled goalie at the end: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Jets win 3, Mammoth win 7.
- 1 WPG 7 UTA 4
- 2 WPG 3 UTA 2
- 3 WPG 4 UTA 3
- 4 WPG 3 UTA 4
- 5 WPG 0 UTA 1
- 6 WPG 0 UTA 2
- 7 WPG 2 UTA 5
- 8 WPG 2 UTA 5
- 9 WPG 3 UTA 7
- 10 WPG 2 UTA 7
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before puck drop
No closing line for this game.
Same teams, fresh game
Needs the closing line, which this game has not got.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every shot redrawn at its chance, overtime and the shootout replayed as near coin flips; the shots themselves and every call fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Jets win 31% of them, Mammoth 69%. The line is what actually happened: Mammoth by 1.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Jets by 3+ | 6.8% |
| Jets by 2 | 6.1% |
| Jets by 1 | 17.9% |
| Mammoth by 1 | 20.0% |
| Mammoth by 2 | 12.1% |
| Mammoth by 3+ | 37.2% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A post hit in a blowout counts for nothing; the same post with a minute left in a tie game can be most of a win.
| Shooting | Unblocked attempts | Goals | Expected goals | Above expected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40 | 3 | 1.96 | +1.04 | |
| 34 | 3 | 2.96 | +0.04 |
Regulation with both goalies in. Expected goals: our model of each shot’s chance from where and how it was taken (distance, angle, shot type, rebound, rush, strength), adjusted for the shooter’s and the goalie’s records. A team above expected finished better or met a weaker night in goal; 75% of the gap counts as luck (why that share).
Calls
Every penalty that put a team on the power play, and every goal taken off the board on review, with what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment. Calls don’t count toward luck by default: who draws penalties repeats from game to game like a skill (how calls are valued). Switch them on below.
| When | Call | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| P1 19:15 | Tripping on the Jets (Neal Pionk): 2 minutes on the power play | +4% UTA |
| P1 8:27 | Interference on the Mammoth (Nick DeSimone): 2 minutes on the power play | +3% WPG |
| P1 2:10 | Hooking on the Mammoth (JJ Peterka): 2 minutes on the power play | +3% WPG |
| P2 9:33 | Interference on the Mammoth (Liam O'Brien): 2 minutes on the power play | +1% WPG |
| P2 2:55 | Interference on the Jets (Tanner Pearson): 2 minutes on the power play | +2% UTA |
| P3 11:59 | Holding on the Jets (Tanner Pearson): 2 minutes on the power play | +2% UTA |
When it happened
Mammoth’ chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | P1 19:15 | Tripping on the Jets (Neal Pionk): 2 minutes on the power playPenalty calls | +4% UTA | – |
| 2 | P1 14:40 | Lawson Crouse scored on a slap shot from 26 feetShooting · 10% chance | +14% UTA | – |
| 3 | P1 10:29 | JJ Peterka scored on a tip from 5 feetShooting · 14% chance | +11% UTA | – |
| 4 | P2 16:59 | Alexander Kerfoot scored on a slap shot from 22 feetShooting · 13% chance | +7% UTA | – |
| 5 | P2 8:42 | Kyle Connor scored on a slap shot from 40 feetShooting · 8% chance | +7% WPG | – |
| 6 | P3 4:37 | Kyle Connor scored on a slap shot from 30 feetShooting · 4% chance | +9% WPG | – |
| 7 | P3 4:12 | Morgan Barron scored on a snap shot from 13 feetShooting · 17% chance | +32% WPG | – |
| 8 | OT | The Mammoth won in overtimeOvertime · overtime is close to a coin flip | +49% UTA | – |
Adjust the assumptions
Think finishing is more skill than we do, or that the calls were luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Jets 31% · Mammoth 69%
- Final margin
- Mammoth by 1
- Luck in goals
- 0.2 for the Mammoth
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Mammoth by 0.8
- Replay with same day's form
- Jets 31% · Mammoth 69% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play from the NHL via fastRhockey; expected goals, in-game win probability and the replays are our own models, fitted on every game since 2018-19 (methodology and validation). Blocked shots aren’t replayed (their location is the block’s, not the shot’s). No betting line for this game, so there is no before-puck-drop or fresh-game number.
More from week 11, 2025-26
- Stars at Sharks Dec 18, 2025 · DAL 5–3 · replay 35% for the winner
- Devils at Mammoth Dec 19, 2025 · NJD 2–1 · replay 43% for the winner
- Maple Leafs at Stars Dec 21, 2025 · DAL 5–1 · replay 44% for the winner
- Kings at Stars Dec 15, 2025 · DAL 4–1 · replay 47% for the winner
- Mammoth at Bruins Dec 16, 2025 · BOS 4–1 · replay 49% for the winner
- Senators at Jets Dec 15, 2025 · OTT 3–2 OT · replay 50% for the winner
- Mammoth at Red Wings Dec 17, 2025 · UTA 4–1 · replay 50% for the winner
- Avalanche at Kraken Dec 16, 2025 · COL 5–3 · replay 51% for the winner
- Wild at Blue Jackets Dec 18, 2025 · MIN 5–2 · replay 52% for the winner
- Rangers at Blues Dec 18, 2025 · NYR 2–1 OT · replay 55% for the winner
- Capitals at Wild Dec 16, 2025 · MIN 5–0 · replay 56% for the winner
- Maple Leafs at Predators Dec 20, 2025 · NSH 5–3 · replay 57% for the winner