2025-26 regular season · March 22, 2026 · OT
No betting line for this game, so there is no before-puck-drop or fresh-game number. The play-by-play has 7 of the game's 11 goals; the replay rests on the shots there are.
Kings at Mammoth, Mar 22, 2026: who deserved to win?
The Mammoth beat the Kings 6–5, but the replays call it close to a coin flip: with the way both teams played, the Mammoth win 5 of 10. Luck ran their way: overtime alone was worth 49 points of win probability to the Mammoth.
The biggest swing (OT): the Mammoth won in overtime, worth 49 points of win probability to the Mammoth.
Final (OT)
| 5 | |
| 6 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +52 Mammoth lucky · −52 Kings
Each team’s own shots from this game, resampled into new games 4,000 times, each a goal at its chance, with the power plays the penalties gave and the pulled goalie at the end: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Kings win 5, Mammoth win 5.
- 1 LAK 7 UTA 3
- 2 LAK 4 UTA 1
- 3 LAK 5 UTA 3
- 4 LAK 4 UTA 3
- 5 LAK 6 UTA 5
- 6 LAK 1 UTA 2
- 7 LAK 4 UTA 5
- 8 LAK 1 UTA 3
- 9 LAK 1 UTA 4
- 10 LAK 4 UTA 8
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before puck drop
No closing line for this game.
Same teams, fresh game
Needs the closing line, which this game has not got.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every shot redrawn at its chance, overtime and the shootout replayed as near coin flips; the shots themselves and every call fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000.2 replays ended
Kings win 52% of them, Mammoth 48%. The line is what actually happened: Mammoth by 1.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Kings by 3+ | 22.6% |
| Kings by 2 | 9.6% |
| Kings by 1 | 20.0% |
| Mammoth by 1 | 20.6% |
| Mammoth by 2 | 9.0% |
| Mammoth by 3+ | 18.3% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A post hit in a blowout counts for nothing; the same post with a minute left in a tie game can be most of a win.
| Shooting | Unblocked attempts | Goals | Expected goals | Above expected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 56 | 3 | 3.40 | −0.40 | |
| 46 | 3 | 3.03 | −0.03 |
Regulation with both goalies in. Expected goals: our model of each shot’s chance from where and how it was taken (distance, angle, shot type, rebound, rush, strength), adjusted for the shooter’s and the goalie’s records. A team above expected finished better or met a weaker night in goal; 75% of the gap counts as luck (why that share).
Calls
Every penalty that put a team on the power play, and every goal taken off the board on review, with what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment. Calls don’t count toward luck by default: who draws penalties repeats from game to game like a skill (how calls are valued). Switch them on below.
| When | Call | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| P3 19:44 | Cross checking on the Kings (Mikey Anderson): 2 minutes on the power play | +5% UTA |
| P3 5:38 | Tripping on the Mammoth (Ian Cole): 2 minutes on the power play | +5% LAK |
When it happened
Mammoth’ chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | P1 12:56 | Lawson Crouse scored on a snap shot from 12 feetShooting · 14% chance | +14% UTA | – |
| 2 | P1 12:20 | Alex Laferriere scored on a snap shot from 26 feetShooting · 9% chance | +15% LAK | – |
| 3 | P1 10:41 | Lawson Crouse scored on a snap shot from 18 feetShooting · 9% chance | +15% UTA | – |
| 4 | P1 10:13 | Quinton Byfield scored on a snap shot from 30 feetShooting · 4% chance | +16% LAK | – |
| 5 | P2 3:49 | Nick Schmaltz’s wrist shot from 5 feet was savedShooting · 16% chanceNick Schmaltz scored on a bat shot from 12 feetShooting · 6% chance | +18% UTA | – |
| 6 | P3 4:54 | Anze Kopitar’s poke shot from 5 feet was savedShooting · 23% chance | +9% UTA | – |
| 7 | P3 3:30 | Artemi Panarin scored on a wrist shot from 35 feetShooting · 2% chance | +39% LAK | – |
| 8 | OT | The Mammoth won in overtimeOvertime · overtime is close to a coin flip | +49% UTA | – |
Adjust the assumptions
Think finishing is more skill than we do, or that the calls were luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Kings 56% · Mammoth 44%
- Final margin
- Mammoth by 1
- Luck in goals
- 1.3 for the Mammoth
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Kings by 0.3
- Replay with same day's form
- Kings 52% · Mammoth 48% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play from the NHL via fastRhockey; expected goals, in-game win probability and the replays are our own models, fitted on every game since 2018-19 (methodology and validation). Blocked shots aren’t replayed (their location is the block’s, not the shot’s). No betting line for this game, so there is no before-puck-drop or fresh-game number. The play-by-play has 7 of the game's 11 goals; the replay rests on the shots there are.
More from week 24, 2025-26
- Predators at Jets Mar 17, 2026 · NSH 4–3 SO · replay 23% for the winner
- Mammoth at Stars Mar 16, 2026 · UTA 6–3 · replay 27% for the winner
- Penguins at Avalanche Mar 16, 2026 · PIT 7–2 · replay 31% for the winner
- Mammoth at Golden Knights Mar 19, 2026 · UTA 4–0 · replay 31% for the winner
- Avalanche at Capitals Mar 22, 2026 · COL 3–2 OT · replay 33% for the winner
- Ducks at Mammoth Mar 20, 2026 · ANA 4–1 · replay 35% for the winner
- Stars at Avalanche Mar 18, 2026 · DAL 2–1 SO · replay 36% for the winner
- Panthers at Canucks Mar 17, 2026 · VAN 5–2 · replay 38% for the winner
- Sabres at Golden Knights Mar 17, 2026 · BUF 2–0 · replay 38% for the winner
- Golden Knights at Predators Mar 21, 2026 · NSH 4–1 · replay 42% for the winner
- Lightning at Flames Mar 22, 2026 · CGY 4–3 OT · replay 45% for the winner
- Flyers at Kings Mar 19, 2026 · PHI 4–3 SO · replay 45% for the winner