2025-26 regular season · November 11, 2025
No betting line for this game, so there is no before-puck-drop or fresh-game number.
Flames at Blues, Nov 11, 2025: who deserved to win?
The Blues beat the Flames 3–2, but the replays call it close to a coin flip: with the way both teams played, the Blues win 6 of 10. Luck ran their way: goaltending alone was worth 27 points of win probability to the Blues.
The biggest swing (P2, 5:31 left): Rasmus Andersson scored on a wrist shot from 56 feet, worth 15 points of win probability to the Flames.
Final
| 2 | |
| 3 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +41 Blues lucky · −41 Flames
Each team’s own shots from this game, resampled into new games 4,000 times, each a goal at its chance, with the power plays the penalties gave and the pulled goalie at the end: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Flames win 4, Blues win 6.
- 1 CGY 4 STL 1
- 2 CGY 5 STL 3
- 3 CGY 1 STL 0
- 4 CGY 2 STL 1
- 5 CGY 5 STL 6
- 6 CGY 0 STL 1
- 7 CGY 1 STL 3
- 8 CGY 0 STL 3
- 9 CGY 5 STL 8
- 10 CGY 0 STL 4
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before puck drop
No closing line for this game.
Same teams, fresh game
Needs the closing line, which this game has not got.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every shot redrawn at its chance, overtime and the shootout replayed as near coin flips; the shots themselves and every call fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000.1 replays ended
Flames win 41% of them, Blues 59%. The line is what actually happened: Blues by 1.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Flames by 3+ | 12.0% |
| Flames by 2 | 8.2% |
| Flames by 1 | 20.5% |
| Blues by 1 | 22.4% |
| Blues by 2 | 11.9% |
| Blues by 3+ | 25.0% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A post hit in a blowout counts for nothing; the same post with a minute left in a tie game can be most of a win.
| Shooting | Unblocked attempts | Goals | Expected goals | Above expected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52 | 2 | 2.58 | −0.58 | |
| 41 | 3 | 2.84 | +0.16 |
Regulation with both goalies in. Expected goals: our model of each shot’s chance from where and how it was taken (distance, angle, shot type, rebound, rush, strength), adjusted for the shooter’s and the goalie’s records. A team above expected finished better or met a weaker night in goal; 75% of the gap counts as luck (why that share).
Calls
Every penalty that put a team on the power play, and every goal taken off the board on review, with what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment. Calls don’t count toward luck by default: who draws penalties repeats from game to game like a skill (how calls are valued). Switch them on below.
| When | Call | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| P1 10:47 | Tripping on the Flames (Samuel Honzek): 2 minutes on the power play | +4% STL |
| P2 19:09 | Hooking on the Flames (Rasmus Andersson): 2 minutes on the power play | +3% STL |
| P2 0:49 | Tripping on the Blues (Nathan Walker): 2 minutes on the power play | +5% CGY |
When it happened
Blues’ chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | P1 9:01 | Dylan Holloway scored on a tip from 8 feetShooting · 15% chance | +14% STL | – |
| 2 | P1 6:17 | Matthew Kessel scored on a wrist shot from 36 feetShooting · 4% chance | +13% STL | – |
| 3 | P2 12:40 | Nathan Walker scored on a backhand shot from 6 feetShooting · 12% chance | +7% STL | – |
| 4 | P2 5:56 | Matt Coronato scored on a snap shot from 39 feetShooting · 4% chance | +7% CGY | – |
| 5 | P2 5:31 | Rasmus Andersson scored on a wrist shot from 56 feetShooting · 1% chance | +15% CGY | – |
| 6 | P2 0:49 | Tripping on the Blues (Nathan Walker): 2 minutes on the power playPenalty calls | +5% CGY | – |
| 7 | P3 15:44 | Nazem Kadri missed the net with a snap shot from 7 feetShooting · 21% chance | +6% STL | – |
| 8 | P3 0:29 | Matt Coronato missed the net with a wrist shot from 28 feetShooting · 9% chance | +4% STL | – |
Adjust the assumptions
Think finishing is more skill than we do, or that the calls were luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Flames 44% · Blues 56%
- Final margin
- Blues by 1
- Luck in goals
- 0.6 for the Blues
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Blues by 0.4
- Replay with same day's form
- Flames 41% · Blues 59% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play from the NHL via fastRhockey; expected goals, in-game win probability and the replays are our own models, fitted on every game since 2018-19 (methodology and validation). Blocked shots aren’t replayed (their location is the block’s, not the shot’s). No betting line for this game, so there is no before-puck-drop or fresh-game number.
More from week 6, 2025-26
- Canucks at Lightning Nov 16, 2025 · VAN 6–2 · replay 24% for the winner
- Islanders at Golden Knights Nov 13, 2025 · NYI 4–3 OT · replay 34% for the winner
- Sharks at Wild Nov 11, 2025 · SJS 2–1 OT · replay 37% for the winner
- Flyers at Blues Nov 14, 2025 · PHI 6–5 SO · replay 40% for the winner
- Kings at Senators Nov 15, 2025 · LAK 1–0 · replay 40% for the winner
- Sharks at Kraken Nov 15, 2025 · SEA 4–1 · replay 40% for the winner
- Predators at Rangers Nov 10, 2025 · NYR 6–3 · replay 41% for the winner
- Panthers at Golden Knights Nov 10, 2025 · FLA 3–2 · replay 42% for the winner
- Blue Jackets at Oilers Nov 10, 2025 · EDM 5–4 OT · replay 43% for the winner
- Islanders at Mammoth Nov 14, 2025 · NYI 3–2 OT · replay 43% for the winner
- Golden Knights at Wild Nov 16, 2025 · MIN 3–2 OT · replay 44% for the winner
- Oilers at Flyers Nov 12, 2025 · EDM 2–1 OT · replay 47% for the winner