CFP first round · December 19, 2025
Alabama at Oklahoma, CFP first round 2025: who deserved to win?
Alabama beat Oklahoma 34–24, a result the replays rarely give: with the way both teams actually played, Oklahoma wins 8 of 10.
Alabama won on an off day: it played far below what the matchup promised. In a fresh game against Oklahoma it would win 53% of the time; with this day’s form, 18%. The numbers
Before kickoff Oklahoma was a 54% favorite. The biggest swing (Q2, 1:18 left): Return touchdown by Alabama, worth 20 points of win probability to Alabama.
Final
| 34 | |
| 24 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +82 Alabama very lucky · −82 Oklahoma
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Alabama wins 2, Oklahoma wins 8.
- 1 ALA 20 OU 7
- 2 ALA 7 OU 3
- 3 ALA 17 OU 20
- 4 ALA 17 OU 24
- 5 ALA 3 OU 13
- 6 ALA 7 OU 19
- 7 ALA 6 OU 21
- 8 ALA 6 OU 24
- 9 ALA 7 OU 29
- 10 ALA 3 OU 34
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
Alabama won on an off day
It played far below what the matchup promised. In a fresh game against Oklahoma it would win 53% of the time; with this day’s form, 18%.
Same teams, fresh game
Replay with same day's form
35 points apart for Alabama: the gap is how differently this game went from what the two teams usually are.
| Unit | This game | Usual level | Better or worse than usual |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama offenseEPA per play gained | +0.03 | +0.08 | worse by 0.05 |
| Alabama defenseEPA per play allowed | −0.05 | +0.04 | better by 0.08 |
| Oklahoma offenseEPA per play gained | −0.05 | +0.02 | worse by 0.07 |
| Oklahoma defenseEPA per play allowed | +0.03 | −0.04 | worse by 0.07 |
EPA (expected points added) per play on competitive snaps, turnovers left out because they are valued as luck. Usual level: the team’s earlier games this season plus half of last season, pulled toward the league average. One team’s defense and the other team’s offense are the same snaps, so one game can’t fully say whose day it was; it shows how far this one was from both teams’ norms.
How 4,000 replays ended
Alabama wins 18% of them, Oklahoma 82%, counting the 2% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Alabama by 10.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Alabama by 17+ | 2.2% |
| Alabama by 9–16 | 5.9% |
| Alabama by 1–8 | 9.3% |
| Level after regulation | 2.0% |
| Oklahoma by 1–8 | 20.9% |
| Oklahoma by 9–16 | 19.5% |
| Oklahoma by 17+ | 40.2% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- T. Sandell, 51 yds made · 59% expected
- C. Talty, 35 yds made · 79% expected
- C. Talty, 40 yds made · 71% expected
- T. Sandell, 36 yds missed · 86% expected
- T. Sandell, 51 yds missed · 58% expected
Penalties: Alabama 4 for 46 yards, Oklahoma 5 for 50 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 1:49 | Unsportsmanlike Conduct on Oklahoma, 15 yards | +2% ALA +0.9 pts |
| Q2 4:29 | Delay of Game on Oklahoma, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% ALA +0.1 pts |
| Q2 0:22 | Sideline Interference on Alabama, 16 yards | 0% OU +1.7 pts |
| Q3 13:37 | False Start on Alabama, 5 yards · pre-snap | +3% OU +0.9 pts |
| Q3 12:19 | Personal Foul on Oklahoma, 15 yards | +5% ALA +1.6 pts |
| Q3 8:06 | Holding on Oklahoma, 10 yards | +3% ALA +1.3 pts |
| Q4 15:00 | Pass Interference on Alabama, 15 yards | +5% OU +1.8 pts |
| Q4 9:48 | False Start on Oklahoma, 5 yards · pre-snap | +4% ALA +0.8 pts |
| Q4 5:55 | Holding on Alabama, 10 yards | +1% OU +0.6 pts |
When it happened
Oklahoma’s chance of winning
As low as 0% and as high as 90%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 13:36 | Oklahoma converted 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 35% expected | +5% OU | OU: Punt |
| 2 | Q1 6:04 | Oklahoma converted 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 25% expected | +5% OU | OU: Touchdown |
| 3 | Q2 1:18 | Return touchdown by AlabamaSpecial teams | +20% ALA | ALA: Punt |
| 4 | Q3 12:19 | Personal Foul on Oklahoma, 15 yardsJudgment calls | +5% ALA | ALA: Touchdown |
| 5 | Q3 6:25 | Alabama converted 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 42% expected | +4% ALA | ALA: Field goal |
| 6 | Q4 15:00 | Pass Interference on Alabama, 15 yardsJudgment calls | +5% OU | OU: Touchdown |
| 7 | Q4 12:07 | Alabama fumbled and recovered itFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +6% ALA | ALA: Punt |
| 8 | Q4 4:10 | Oklahoma converted 4th & 53rd & 4th downs · 38% expected | +5% OU | OU: Missed field goal |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Alabama 89% · Oklahoma 11%
- Final margin
- Alabama by 10
- Luck in points
- 1.7 for Alabama
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Alabama by 8.3
- Replay with same day's form
- Alabama 18% · Oklahoma 82% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All College Football Playoff 2025 games ·
Alabama ·
Oklahoma
More from College Football Playoff 2025
- Miami at Texas A&M MIA 10–3 · replay 42% for the winner
- Miami vs Ole Miss MIA 31–27 · replay 63% for the winner
- Ole Miss vs Georgia MISS 39–34 · replay 71% for the winner
- Tulane at Ole Miss MISS 41–10 · replay 98% for the winner
- Alabama vs Indiana IU 38–3 · replay 100% for the winner
- Miami vs Indiana IU 27–21 · replay 22% for the winner
- Miami vs Ohio State MIA 24–14 · replay 30% for the winner
- Oregon vs Texas Tech ORE 23–0 · replay 56% for the winner
- Oregon vs Indiana IU 56–22 · replay 61% for the winner
- James Madison at Oregon ORE 51–34 · replay 99% for the winner