CFP quarterfinal, Rose Bowl · January 1, 2026
Alabama vs Indiana, CFP quarterfinal, Rose Bowl 2026: who deserved to win?
Indiana beat Alabama 38–3, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, Indiana wins 10 of 10.
Before kickoff Indiana was a 69% favorite.
Final
| 3 | |
| 38 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index 0 Indiana about even · 0 Alabama
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Alabama wins 0, Indiana wins 10.
- 1 ALA 7 IU 16
- 2 ALA 6 IU 23
- 3 ALA 10 IU 31
- 4 ALA 13 IU 37
- 5 ALA 3 IU 31
- 6 ALA 17 IU 48
- 7 ALA 0 IU 34
- 8 ALA 0 IU 35
- 9 ALA 0 IU 41
- 10 ALA 3 IU 49
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Alabama wins 0% of them, Indiana 100%. The line is what actually happened: Indiana by 35.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Alabama by 17+ | 0.0% |
| Alabama by 9–16 | 0.0% |
| Alabama by 1–8 | 0.2% |
| Level after regulation | 0.1% |
| Indiana by 1–8 | 1.6% |
| Indiana by 9–16 | 5.8% |
| Indiana by 17+ | 92.3% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- N. Radicic, 31 yds made · 88% expected
- C. Talty, 28 yds made · 87% expected
Penalties: Alabama 1 for 5 yards, Indiana 1 for 10 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q2 12:35 | Holding on Indiana, 10 yards | +2% ALA +1.2 pts |
| Q4 2:00 | Offside on Alabama, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% IU +1.3 pts |
When it happened
Indiana’s chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 13:43 | Indiana was stopped on 3rd & 43rd & 4th downs · 52% expected | +3% ALA | IU: Punt |
| 2 | Q1 12:13 | Alabama converted 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 34% expected | +4% ALA | ALA: Punt |
| 3 | Q1 7:31 | Indiana converted 3rd & 23rd & 4th downs · 68% expected | +2% IU | IU: Field goal |
| 4 | Q2 12:36 | Alabama was stopped on 4th & 13rd & 4th downs · 72% expected | +7% IU | ALA: Punt |
| 5 | Q2 12:35 | Holding on Indiana, 10 yardsJudgment calls | +2% ALA | ALA: Punt |
| 6 | Q2 10:49 | Indiana converted 3rd & 83rd & 4th downs · 36% expected | +4% IU | IU: Punt |
| 7 | Q2 6:48 | Indiana was stopped on 3rd & 123rd & 4th downs · 28% expected | +2% ALA | IU: Punt |
| 8 | Q2 3:09 | Alabama fumbled and Indiana recoveredFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +2% IU | ALA: End of half |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Alabama 0% · Indiana 100%
- Final margin
- Indiana by 35
- Luck in points
- 7.5 for Indiana
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Indiana by 27.5
- Replay with same day's form
- Alabama 0% · Indiana 100% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All College Football Playoff 2025 games ·
Alabama ·
Indiana
More from College Football Playoff 2025
- Alabama at Oklahoma ALA 34–24 · replay 18% for the winner
- Miami vs Indiana IU 27–21 · replay 22% for the winner
- Miami vs Ohio State MIA 24–14 · replay 30% for the winner
- Miami at Texas A&M MIA 10–3 · replay 42% for the winner
- Oregon vs Texas Tech ORE 23–0 · replay 56% for the winner
- Oregon vs Indiana IU 56–22 · replay 61% for the winner
- Miami vs Ole Miss MIA 31–27 · replay 63% for the winner
- Ole Miss vs Georgia MISS 39–34 · replay 71% for the winner
- Tulane at Ole Miss MISS 41–10 · replay 98% for the winner
- James Madison at Oregon ORE 51–34 · replay 99% for the winner