2026 season · through Week 4
College football power rankings, week 5
All 138 FBS teams, ranked by how good each is once the luck is adjusted for: the points it would beat an average FBS team by on a neutral field. Notre Dame is No. 1 at +27.1 points, Ohio State No. 2 (+25.2), Indiana No. 3 (+23.5).
Biggest climb since last week: UCLA, up 27 to No. 23. Biggest drop: Maryland, down 26 to No. 88. South Florida is 4–0 with +1.6 wins of luck in it, so it ranks below what the record says. The same ratings make our predictions.
| # | Team | Record | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4–0 | +27.1 | |
| 2 | 3–1 | +25.2 | |
| 3 | 4–0 | +23.5 | |
| 4 | 4–0 | +23.3 | |
| 5 | 4–0 | +23.1 | |
| 6 | 4–0 | +22.1 | |
| 7 | 4–0 | +22.0 | |
| 8 | 4–0 | +21.8 | |
| 9 | 3–1 | +19.0 | |
| 10 | 4–0 | +17.6 | |
| 11 | 3–1 | +16.7 | |
| 12 | 3–1 | +15.6 | |
| 13 | 4–0 | +15.1 | |
| 14 | 3–1 | +15.0 | |
| 15 | 4–0 | +13.4 | |
| 16 | 4–0 | +13.3 | |
| 17 | 2–2 | +12.8 | |
| 18 | 4–0 | +12.7 | |
| 19 | 3–0 | +12.5 | |
| 20 | 3–1 | +12.2 | |
| 21 | 4–1 | +11.6 | |
| 22 | 4–0 | +11.3 | |
| 23 | 4–0 | +11.2 | |
| 24 | 2–2 | +10.9 | |
| 25 | 4–0 | +10.7 | |
| 26 | 3–1 | +10.4 | |
| 27 | 4–0 | +10.0 | |
| 28 | 2–1 | +9.7 | |
| 29 | 3–1 | +9.7 | |
| 30 | 2–2 | +9.3 | |
| 31 | 3–1 | +9.2 | |
| 32 | 2–2 | +8.6 | |
| 33 | 3–1 | +8.5 | |
| 34 | 3–1 | +8.4 | |
| 35 | 3–1 | +8.1 | |
| 36 | 3–1 | +7.9 | |
| 37 | 3–1 | +7.8 | |
| 38 | 2–2 | +7.5 | |
| 39 | 3–1 | +7.5 | |
| 40 | 3–1 | +7.3 | |
| 41 | 3–1 | +7.0 | |
| 42 | 2–2 | +6.8 | |
| 43 | 3–1 | +6.1 | |
| 44 | 2–2 | +5.7 | |
| 45 | 3–1 | +5.4 | |
| 46 | 2–2 | +5.3 | |
| 47 | 4–0 | +5.1 | |
| 48 | 4–0 | +5.1 | |
| 49 | 3–1 | +5.0 | |
| 50 | 3–1 | +4.9 | |
| 51 | 4–0 | +4.8 | |
| 52 | 3–1 | +4.6 | |
| 53 | 3–1 | +4.5 | |
| 54 | 2–1 | +4.1 | |
| 55 | 3–1 | +3.7 | |
| 56 | 2–2 | +3.3 | |
| 57 | 3–1 | +2.9 | |
| 58 | 2–2 | +2.8 | |
| 59 | 3–1 | +2.8 | |
| 60 | 2–1 | +2.7 | |
| 61 | 3–1 | +2.6 | |
| 62 | 2–2 | +2.3 | |
| 63 | 4–0 | +2.2 | |
| 64 | 3–1 | +1.1 | |
| 65 | 2–2 | +0.1 | |
| 66 | 2–1 | −0.4 | |
| 67 | 2–2 | −0.6 | |
| 68 | 3–1 | −0.6 | |
| 69 | 1–2 | −0.6 | |
| 70 | 1–3 | −0.7 | |
| 71 | 2–2 | −0.8 | |
| 72 | 3–1 | −1.0 | |
| 73 | 3–1 | −1.4 | |
| 74 | 2–2 | −1.5 | |
| 75 | 2–2 | −1.5 | |
| 76 | 2–2 | −1.9 | |
| 77 | 2–2 | −2.0 | |
| 78 | 3–1 | −2.1 | |
| 79 | 2–2 | −2.4 | |
| 80 | 3–1 | −3.1 | |
| 81 | 1–2 | −3.1 | |
| 82 | 1–3 | −3.3 | |
| 83 | 2–2 | −4.0 | |
| 84 | 1–3 | −4.3 | |
| 85 | 1–3 | −4.7 | |
| 86 | 1–2 | −4.9 | |
| 87 | 1–3 | −4.9 | |
| 88 | 2–2 | −5.4 | |
| 89 | 3–1 | −5.5 | |
| 90 | 2–2 | −5.7 | |
| 91 | 2–1 | −5.7 | |
| 92 | 3–1 | −5.8 | |
| 93 | 2–2 | −5.9 | |
| 94 | 1–3 | −5.9 | |
| 95 | 1–3 | −6.1 | |
| 96 | 1–2 | −6.1 | |
| 97 | 2–2 | −6.5 | |
| 98 | 2–2 | −6.5 | |
| 99 | 3–2 | −6.6 | |
| 100 | 3–1 | −6.9 | |
| 101 | 2–2 | −7.0 | |
| 102 | 1–3 | −7.3 | |
| 103 | 1–3 | −8.1 | |
| 104 | 2–2 | −8.1 | |
| 105 | 3–1 | −8.2 | |
| 106 | 2–2 | −8.3 | |
| 107 | 2–2 | −8.8 | |
| 108 | 1–3 | −8.9 | |
| 109 | 2–2 | −9.8 | |
| 110 | 2–2 | −10.0 | |
| 111 | 1–3 | −10.1 | |
| 112 | 2–2 | −10.3 | |
| 113 | 4–0 | −11.0 | |
| 114 | 2–2 | −11.5 | |
| 115 | 1–3 | −11.5 | |
| 116 | 3–1 | −11.8 | |
| 117 | 1–3 | −11.9 | |
| 118 | 1–3 | −12.3 | |
| 119 | 2–2 | −12.6 | |
| 120 | 1–3 | −12.7 | |
| 121 | 1–3 | −12.9 | |
| 122 | 1–3 | −13.0 | |
| 123 | 1–3 | −13.9 | |
| 124 | 2–2 | −14.5 | |
| 125 | 2–2 | −14.5 | |
| 126 | 2–2 | −14.9 | |
| 127 | 1–3 | −15.5 | |
| 128 | 0–4 | −16.8 | |
| 129 | 1–3 | −17.6 | |
| 130 | 2–3 | −18.1 | |
| 131 | 0–4 | −19.2 | |
| 132 | 2–2 | −19.6 | |
| 133 | 1–3 | −20.1 | |
| 134 | 2–2 | −20.4 | |
| 135 | 1–3 | −20.4 | |
| 136 | 0–4 | −22.4 | |
| 137 | 1–4 | −23.8 | |
| 138 | 0–4 | −24.3 |
Rating: points better than an average FBS team on a neutral field. This season and last season add up to it: this season’s games, rated against the opponents played, and the start from last season’s final rating. Luck: wins above what the team’s play was worth, from replaying every game 4,000 times. Injuries, which change the week’s predictions, are left out: one week’s news.
Top 25, week 5
- Notre Dame Fighting Irish +27.1, 4–0
- Ohio State Buckeyes +25.2, 3–1
- Indiana Hoosiers +23.5, 4–0
- Alabama Crimson Tide +23.3, 4–0
- Georgia Bulldogs +23.1, 4–0
- Texas Longhorns +22.1, 4–0
- Utah Utes +22.0, 4–0
- Miami Hurricanes +21.8, 4–0
- LSU Tigers +19.0, 3–1
- Florida Gators +17.6, 4–0
- Oregon Ducks +16.7, 3–1
- Tennessee Volunteers +15.6, 3–1
- Iowa Hawkeyes +15.1, 4–0
- Penn State Nittany Lions +15.0, 3–1
- Nebraska Cornhuskers +13.4, 4–0
- Texas Tech Red Raiders +13.3, 4–0
- Texas A&M Aggies +12.8, 2–2
- Mississippi State Bulldogs +12.7, 4–0
- BYU Cougars +12.5, 3–0
- Ole Miss Rebels +12.2, 3–1
- USC Trojans +11.6, 4–1
- Pittsburgh Panthers +11.3, 4–0
- UCLA Bruins +11.2, 4–0
- Oklahoma Sooners +10.9, 2–2
- James Madison Dukes +10.7, 4–0
Questions
Who is No. 1 in the college football power rankings for week 5 of 2026?
Notre Dame, rated +27.1 points better than an average FBS team on a neutral field, from a 4–0 start. Next: Ohio State (+25.2) and Indiana (+23.5).
How are these power rankings made?
Every team, FBS and FCS, is rated against the opponents it has played: each game’s final margin (capped at 50) and its luck-adjusted result, with the kicks, fumble bounces and conversions re-rolled at their expected rates. Last season’s rating is the starting point and fades as games are played. The rating is the points a team would beat an average FBS team by on a neutral field; the same ratings make our predictions.
Why is a team with a better record ranked lower?
Because records carry luck, and close games, fumble bounces and missed kicks even out. A team that won its games by luck is rated on how it played, like South Florida: 4–0, +1.6 wins of luck, ranked 48; one that lost by bad luck ranks higher than its record, like Georgia Tech (1–3, −1.9 wins of luck, ranked 70).
Predictions · Luck rankings 2026 · Expected wins · How the replays work