2026 season · through Week 1
College football power rankings, week 2
All 138 FBS teams, ranked by how good each is once the luck is adjusted for: the points it would beat an average FBS team by on a neutral field. Indiana is No. 1 at +29.3 points, Ohio State No. 2 (+24.3), Notre Dame No. 3 (+23.8).
Biggest climb since last week: Nevada, up 34 to No. 83. Biggest drop: Rutgers, down 41 to No. 108. Colorado is 1–0 with +0.8 wins of luck in it, so it ranks below what the record says. The same ratings make our predictions.
| # | Team | Record | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1–0 | +29.3 | |
| 2 | 1–0 | +24.3 | |
| 3 | 1–0 | +23.8 | |
| 4 | 1–0 | +23.6 | |
| 5 | 1–0 | +19.7 | |
| 6 | 1–0 | +18.7 | |
| 7 | 1–0 | +18.4 | |
| 8 | 1–0 | +18.4 | |
| 9 | 1–0 | +18.2 | |
| 10 | 1–0 | +18.1 | |
| 11 | 1–0 | +16.3 | |
| 12 | 1–0 | +15.4 | |
| 13 | 1–0 | +15.3 | |
| 14 | 1–0 | +15.1 | |
| 15 | 2–0 | +14.7 | |
| 16 | 1–0 | +14.7 | |
| 17 | 1–0 | +14.6 | |
| 18 | 1–0 | +13.1 | |
| 19 | 1–0 | +12.7 | |
| 20 | 1–0 | +10.8 | |
| 21 | 1–0 | +10.8 | |
| 22 | 1–0 | +10.7 | |
| 23 | 1–0 | +10.7 | |
| 24 | 1–0 | +10.5 | |
| 25 | 1–0 | +10.2 | |
| 26 | 1–0 | +10.0 | |
| 27 | 0–1 | +9.7 | |
| 28 | 1–0 | +8.8 | |
| 29 | 1–0 | +7.3 | |
| 30 | 1–0 | +7.1 | |
| 31 | 0–1 | +7.0 | |
| 32 | 1–0 | +6.9 | |
| 33 | 1–0 | +6.8 | |
| 34 | 1–0 | +6.8 | |
| 35 | 1–0 | +6.8 | |
| 36 | 1–0 | +6.8 | |
| 37 | 1–0 | +6.7 | |
| 38 | 1–0 | +6.3 | |
| 39 | 1–0 | +6.3 | |
| 40 | 1–0 | +6.2 | |
| 41 | 0–1 | +5.8 | |
| 42 | 2–0 | +5.3 | |
| 43 | 1–0 | +5.1 | |
| 44 | 1–0 | +4.8 | |
| 45 | 2–0 | +4.6 | |
| 46 | 1–0 | +4.6 | |
| 47 | 1–1 | +4.0 | |
| 48 | 1–0 | +3.6 | |
| 49 | 0–1 | +3.6 | |
| 50 | 1–0 | +3.5 | |
| 51 | 1–0 | +3.4 | |
| 52 | 0–1 | +3.2 | |
| 53 | 0–1 | +3.1 | |
| 54 | 1–0 | +3.0 | |
| 55 | 1–0 | +2.7 | |
| 56 | 1–0 | +2.5 | |
| 57 | 0–1 | +2.5 | |
| 58 | 0–1 | +2.5 | |
| 59 | 0–1 | +2.4 | |
| 60 | 1–0 | +2.1 | |
| 61 | 1–0 | +2.1 | |
| 62 | 0–1 | +1.9 | |
| 63 | 1–0 | +1.8 | |
| 64 | 1–0 | +1.6 | |
| 65 | 1–0 | +1.6 | |
| 66 | 1–1 | +1.4 | |
| 67 | 1–0 | +1.0 | |
| 68 | 1–0 | +0.8 | |
| 69 | 0–1 | +0.8 | |
| 70 | 1–0 | +0.1 | |
| 71 | 0–1 | −0.3 | |
| 72 | 0–1 | −0.4 | |
| 73 | 1–0 | −0.4 | |
| 74 | 1–0 | −0.5 | |
| 75 | 0–1 | −0.5 | |
| 76 | 1–0 | −0.5 | |
| 77 | 1–0 | −0.6 | |
| 78 | 1–0 | −0.8 | |
| 79 | 1–0 | −1.0 | |
| 80 | 1–0 | −1.3 | |
| 81 | 1–0 | −3.1 | |
| 82 | 1–0 | −3.2 | |
| 83 | 1–0 | −3.4 | |
| 84 | 1–0 | −4.5 | |
| 85 | 0–1 | −4.5 | |
| 86 | 1–0 | −4.8 | |
| 87 | 1–0 | −5.0 | |
| 88 | 1–0 | −5.1 | |
| 89 | 0–1 | −5.4 | |
| 90 | 1–0 | −5.6 | |
| 91 | 1–0 | −5.9 | |
| 92 | 1–0 | −6.0 | |
| 93 | 0–1 | −6.1 | |
| 94 | 0–1 | −6.1 | |
| 95 | 1–1 | −6.4 | |
| 96 | 1–1 | −6.4 | |
| 97 | 0–1 | −6.4 | |
| 98 | 0–1 | −6.8 | |
| 99 | 1–0 | −6.9 | |
| 100 | 1–0 | −7.8 | |
| 101 | 1–0 | −7.8 | |
| 102 | 1–1 | −8.3 | |
| 103 | 0–1 | −8.4 | |
| 104 | 0–1 | −8.6 | |
| 105 | 0–1 | −8.7 | |
| 106 | 1–0 | −8.8 | |
| 107 | 0–1 | −8.9 | |
| 108 | 0–1 | −9.3 | |
| 109 | 1–0 | −9.5 | |
| 110 | 0–2 | −9.6 | |
| 111 | 1–0 | −9.7 | |
| 112 | 0–1 | −9.9 | |
| 113 | 0–1 | −10.5 | |
| 114 | 0–1 | −10.5 | |
| 115 | 0–1 | −11.0 | |
| 116 | 1–1 | −11.5 | |
| 117 | 0–1 | −11.5 | |
| 118 | 0–1 | −12.3 | |
| 119 | 1–0 | −12.4 | |
| 120 | 1–1 | −12.4 | |
| 121 | 0–1 | −12.6 | |
| 122 | 0–1 | −12.8 | |
| 123 | 1–0 | −13.0 | |
| 124 | 0–1 | −13.1 | |
| 125 | 1–1 | −13.4 | |
| 126 | 0–1 | −13.7 | |
| 127 | 0–1 | −13.8 | |
| 128 | 0–1 | −13.9 | |
| 129 | 0–1 | −15.3 | |
| 130 | 1–0 | −15.4 | |
| 131 | 0–1 | −15.7 | |
| 132 | 1–0 | −16.7 | |
| 133 | 1–0 | −16.8 | |
| 134 | 0–1 | −17.6 | |
| 135 | 0–1 | −18.5 | |
| 136 | 0–1 | −21.4 | |
| 137 | 0–1 | −21.6 | |
| 138 | 0–1 | −23.0 |
Rating: points better than an average FBS team on a neutral field. This season and last season add up to it: this season’s games, rated against the opponents played, and the start from last season’s final rating. Luck: wins above what the team’s play was worth, from replaying every game 4,000 times. Injuries, which change the week’s predictions, are left out: one week’s news.
Top 25, week 2
- Indiana Hoosiers +29.3, 1–0
- Ohio State Buckeyes +24.3, 1–0
- Notre Dame Fighting Irish +23.8, 1–0
- Miami Hurricanes +23.6, 1–0
- Texas Longhorns +19.7, 1–0
- Alabama Crimson Tide +18.7, 1–0
- Texas A&M Aggies +18.4, 1–0
- Oregon Ducks +18.4, 1–0
- Utah Utes +18.2, 1–0
- Penn State Nittany Lions +18.1, 1–0
- Oklahoma Sooners +16.3, 1–0
- Ole Miss Rebels +15.4, 1–0
- Iowa Hawkeyes +15.3, 1–0
- LSU Tigers +15.1, 1–0
- USC Trojans +14.7, 2–0
- Georgia Bulldogs +14.7, 1–0
- Texas Tech Red Raiders +14.6, 1–0
- Pittsburgh Panthers +13.1, 1–0
- Washington Huskies +12.7, 1–0
- Virginia Cavaliers +10.8, 1–0
- BYU Cougars +10.8, 1–0
- Tennessee Volunteers +10.7, 1–0
- SMU Mustangs +10.7, 1–0
- South Carolina Gamecocks +10.5, 1–0
- Florida Gators +10.2, 1–0
Questions
Who is No. 1 in the college football power rankings for week 2 of 2026?
Indiana, rated +29.3 points better than an average FBS team on a neutral field, from a 1–0 start. Next: Ohio State (+24.3) and Notre Dame (+23.8).
How are these power rankings made?
Every team, FBS and FCS, is rated against the opponents it has played: each game’s final margin (capped at 50) and its luck-adjusted result, with the kicks, fumble bounces and conversions re-rolled at their expected rates. Last season’s rating is the starting point and fades as games are played. The rating is the points a team would beat an average FBS team by on a neutral field; the same ratings make our predictions.
Why is a team with a better record ranked lower?
Because records carry luck, and close games, fumble bounces and missed kicks even out. A team that won its games by luck is rated on how it played, like Colorado: 1–0, +0.8 wins of luck, ranked 68; one that lost by bad luck ranks higher than its record, like Utah State (0–1, −0.8 wins of luck, ranked 113).
Predictions · Luck rankings 2026 · Expected wins · How the replays work