ACC · 2026 season, in progress
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets: luck and expected wins
Georgia Tech is 1–3 so far in 2026; replayed with the same day’s form, its play was worth 2.9 wins. Luck cost 1.9: the unluckiest team in FBS. In one-score games: 0–2.
2026, game by game
How often Georgia Tech wins each game when it’s replayed with the way both teams played (the postgame win expectancy), and the luck index: 100 × (the result − that number).
| Week | Game | Result | Wins the replay | Luck index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 1 | vs Colorado | L 13–14 | 81% | −81 |
| Week 2 | vs Tennessee | L 24–45 | 67% | −67 |
| Week 3 | vs Mercer | W 44–11 | 98% | +2 |
| Week 4 | @ Stanford | L 27–34 | 41% | −41 |
Next games: our predictions
Every game ahead, forecast adjusted for luck. Each page has the spread, the win chance and the range of likely margins, and shows who deserved to win once it’s played.
| Week | Game | Our pick | Georgia Tech win chance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 6 · Oct 10 | vs Duke | 32% | |
| Week 7 · Oct 17 | at Virginia Tech | 35% | |
| Week 8 · Oct 24 | vs Boston College | 78% | |
| Week 9 · Oct 31 | at Pittsburgh | 18% | |
| Week 10 · Nov 7 | vs Louisville | 36% | |
| Week 11 · Nov 14 | at Clemson | 35% | |
| Week 12 · Nov 21 | vs Wake Forest | 47% | |
| Week 13 · Nov 28 | at Georgia | 6% |
Where the luck came from, 2026
Luck over the regular season by kind, in wins: every lucky or unlucky play weighted by the moment it happened, so a missed kick at the end of a close game counts for far more than one in a blowout. Positive: in Georgia Tech’s favor.
| Kind | Wins | Points |
|---|---|---|
| Kicks | +0.13 | −4.3 |
| Pre-snap flags | +0.10 | −1.4 |
| Fumble bounces | −0.10 | −7.0 |
| 3rd & 4th downs | −0.18 | −8.3 |
Luckiest wins
Wins Georgia Tech takes least often when the game is replayed with the way both teams played.
| Week | Game | Result | Wins the replay | Luck index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Week 3 | vs Clemson | W 24–21 | 33% | +67 |
| 2025 Week 5 | @ Wake Forest | W 30–29 | 40% | +60 |
| 2025 Week 8 | @ Duke | W 27–18 | 62% | +38 |
| 2025 Week 12 | @ Boston College | W 36–34 | 70% | +30 |
| 2025 Week 7 | vs Virginia Tech | W 35–20 | 77% | +23 |
Unluckiest losses
Losses Georgia Tech would win most often in a replay.
| Week | Game | Result | Wins the replay | Luck index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Week 1 | vs Colorado | L 13–14 | 81% | −81 |
| 2026 Week 2 | vs Tennessee | L 24–45 | 67% | −67 |
| 2025 Week 14 | vs Georgia | L 9–16 | 65% | −65 |
| 2025 Week 10 | @ NC State | L 36–48 | 65% | −65 |
| 2026 Week 4 | @ Stanford | L 27–34 | 41% | −41 |
Earlier seasons
| Season | Record | Replay wins | Luck | One-score | Postseason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 9–3 | 8.2 | +0.8 | 4–1 | 0–1 |
2025, game by game
| Week | Game | Result | Wins the replay | Luck index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 1 | @ Colorado | W 27–20 | 88% | +12 |
| Week 2 | vs Gardner-Webb | W 59–12 | 100% | 0 |
| Week 3 | vs Clemson | W 24–21 | 33% | +67 |
| Week 4 | vs Temple | W 45–24 | 100% | 0 |
| Week 5 | @ Wake Forest | W 30–29 | 40% | +60 |
| Week 7 | vs Virginia Tech | W 35–20 | 77% | +23 |
| Week 8 | @ Duke | W 27–18 | 62% | +38 |
| Week 9 | vs Syracuse | W 41–16 | 97% | +3 |
| Week 10 | @ NC State | L 36–48 | 65% | −65 |
| Week 12 | @ Boston College | W 36–34 | 70% | +30 |
| Week 13 | vs Pittsburgh | L 28–42 | 20% | −20 |
| Week 14 | vs Georgia | L 9–16 | 65% | −65 |
| Pop-Tarts Bowl | vs BYU | L 21–25 | 18% | −18 |
More
- 2026 college football luck rankings
- ACC teams by luck
- ACC:
Boston College,
California,
Clemson,
Duke,
Florida State,
Louisville,
Miami,
NC State,
North Carolina,
Pittsburgh,
SMU,
Stanford,
Syracuse,
Virginia,
Virginia Tech,
Wake Forest
How many wins does Georgia Tech have in 2026?
1–3 so far. Replayed with the way both teams played, its games were worth 2.9 wins.
Was Georgia Tech lucky or unlucky in 2026?
Unlucky so far: −1.9 wins of luck, the unluckiest team in FBS.
What was Georgia Tech’s luckiest season?
2025: 9–3 from play worth 8.2 wins, +0.8 of luck. The unluckiest: 2026, 1–3 from play worth 2.9 (−1.9).