Week 3 2026 · September 19, 2026
Mercer at Georgia Tech, Week 3 2026: who deserved to win?
Georgia Tech beat Mercer 44–11, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, Georgia Tech wins 10 of 10.
Before kickoff Georgia Tech was a 99% favorite.
Final
| 11 | |
| 44 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +2 Georgia Tech about even · −2 Mercer
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Mercer wins 0, Georgia Tech wins 10.
- 1 MER 34 GT 38
- 2 MER 35 GT 45
- 3 MER 20 GT 34
- 4 MER 14 GT 34
- 5 MER 7 GT 30
- 6 MER 14 GT 41
- 7 MER 7 GT 38
- 8 MER 17 GT 52
- 9 MER 0 GT 40
- 10 MER 7 GT 56
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Mercer wins 2% of them, Georgia Tech 98%, counting the 1% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Georgia Tech by 33.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Mercer by 17+ | 0.1% |
| Mercer by 9–16 | 0.4% |
| Mercer by 1–8 | 1.3% |
| Level after regulation | 0.5% |
| Georgia Tech by 1–8 | 5.4% |
| Georgia Tech by 9–16 | 9.6% |
| Georgia Tech by 17+ | 82.7% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
No play in this game swung win probability by luck.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- S. Zeidan, 21 yds made · 93% expected
- A. Birr, 32 yds made · 85% expected
- S. Zeidan, 40 yds made · 72% expected
- S. Zeidan, 31 yds made · 86% expected
- Extra point missed · 98% expected
Penalties: Mercer 8 for 75 yards, Georgia Tech 6 for 59 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q2 12:37 | Personal Foul on Georgia Tech, 15 yards | 0% MER +1.1 pts |
| Q2 9:56 | Personal Foul on Georgia Tech, 9 yards | 0% MER +1.3 pts |
| Q2 5:23 | Offside on Mercer, 6 yards · pre-snap | 0% GT +1.8 pts |
| Q2 3:35 | Holding on Georgia Tech, 10 yards, wiping out the play | 0% MER +4.0 pts |
| Q2 3:29 | Pass Interference on Mercer, 13 yards | 0% GT +2.7 pts |
| Q2 2:39 | Illegal Snap on Georgia Tech, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% MER +1.7 pts |
| Q2 1:03 | False Start on Mercer, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% GT +0.4 pts |
| Q3 11:23 | Holding on Mercer, 10 yards | 0% GT +1.9 pts |
| Q3 6:58 | Unsportsmanlike Conduct on Mercer, 15 yards | 0% GT +1.4 pts |
| Q3 4:42 | Holding on Mercer, 10 yards | 0% GT +2.4 pts |
| Q3 2:43 | Chop Block on Georgia Tech, 15 yards | 0% MER +0.9 pts |
| Q4 12:14 | Roughing the Passer on Mercer, 6 yards | 0% GT +1.1 pts |
| Q4 10:44 | Offside on Georgia Tech, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% MER +1.0 pts |
| Q4 3:44 | Holding on Mercer, 10 yards, wiping out the play | +1% GT +1.4 pts |
When it happened
Georgia Tech’s chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 14:16 | Georgia Tech was stopped on 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 43% expected | +0% MER | GT: Punt |
| 2 | Q1 12:05 | Mercer was stopped on 3rd & 33rd & 4th downs · 57% expected | +0% GT | MER: Punt |
| 3 | Q1 2:13 | Georgia Tech was stopped on 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 43% expected | +0% MER | GT: Punt |
| 4 | Q1 1:16 | Mercer fumbled and Georgia Tech recoveredFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +0% GT | MER: Field goal |
| 5 | Q2 3:35 | Holding on Georgia Tech, 10 yards, wiping out the playJudgment calls | +0% MER | MER: Punt |
| 6 | Q3 11:23 | Holding on Mercer, 10 yardsJudgment calls | +0% GT | GT: Touchdown |
| 7 | Q3 4:42 | Holding on Mercer, 10 yardsJudgment calls | +0% GT | GT: Touchdown |
| 8 | Q4 3:44 | Holding on Mercer, 10 yards, wiping out the playJudgment calls | +1% GT | GT: End of game |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Mercer 0% · Georgia Tech 100%
- Final margin
- Georgia Tech by 33
- Luck in points
- 6.3 for Mercer
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Georgia Tech by 39.3
- Replay with same day's form
- Mercer 2% · Georgia Tech 98% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 3 2026 games ·
Mercer ·
Georgia Tech
More from Week 3 2026
- Virginia Tech at Maryland VT 35–26 · replay 47% for the winner
- SMU at Louisville LOU 41–31 · replay 69% for the winner
- North Carolina at Clemson CLEM 28–20 · replay 70% for the winner
- NC State at Vanderbilt VAN 35–31 · replay 77% for the winner
- Florida State at Alabama ALA 50–36 · replay 77% for the winner
- Miami at Wake Forest MIA 33–20 · replay 83% for the winner
- Syracuse at Pittsburgh PITT 27–13 · replay 88% for the winner
- Maine at Boston College BC 22–16 · replay 90% for the winner
- West Virginia vs Virginia WVU 38–27 · replay 93% for the winner
- Stanford at Duke DUKE 35–7 · replay 99% for the winner
- Wagner at California CAL 49–7 · replay 100% for the winner
- Arizona State vs Kansas ASU 24–17 · replay 8% for the winner