Week 3 2026 · September 18, 2026
Miami at Wake Forest, Week 3 2026: who deserved to win?
Miami beat Wake Forest 33–20, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, Miami wins 8 of 10.
Before kickoff Miami was a 91% favorite.
Final
| 33 | |
| 20 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +17 Miami about even · −17 Wake Forest
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Miami wins 8, Wake Forest wins 2.
- 1 MIA 41 WAKE 3
- 2 MIA 52 WAKE 24
- 3 MIA 31 WAKE 7
- 4 MIA 41 WAKE 21
- 5 MIA 33 WAKE 16
- 6 MIA 30 WAKE 17
- 7 MIA 34 WAKE 26
- 8 MIA 38 WAKE 35
- 9 MIA 25 WAKE 30
- 10 MIA 10 WAKE 27
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Miami wins 83% of them, Wake Forest 17%, counting the 1% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Miami by 13.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Miami by 17+ | 43.0% |
| Miami by 9–16 | 19.1% |
| Miami by 1–8 | 20.4% |
| Level after regulation | 1.1% |
| Wake Forest by 1–8 | 9.5% |
| Wake Forest by 9–16 | 4.8% |
| Wake Forest by 17+ | 2.2% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- J. Weinberg, 27 yds made · 90% expected
- J. Weinberg, 54 yds blocked · 47% expected
Penalties: Miami 6 for 75 yards, Wake Forest 10 for 92 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 14:53 | Holding on Miami, 8 yards | 0% WAKE +0.5 pts |
| Q1 10:06 | Face Mask on Wake Forest, 15 yards | 0% MIA +0.8 pts |
| Q1 9:44 | Illegal Block on Miami, 10 yards | +1% WAKE +1.1 pts |
| Q1 6:18 | Pass Interference on Wake Forest, 10 yards, wiping out the play | +1% MIA +0.9 pts |
| Q1 3:58 | Roughing the Passer on Miami, 15 yards | +1% WAKE +1.6 pts |
| Q2 11:29 | Roughing the Passer on Wake Forest, 15 yards | 0% MIA +0.8 pts |
| Q3 13:09 | False Start on Wake Forest, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% WAKE +1.1 pts |
| Q3 9:18 | Personal Foul on Wake Forest, 2 yards | 0% MIA +0.8 pts |
| Q3 7:49 | Holding on Wake Forest, 10 yards, wiping out the play | 0% MIA +2.9 pts |
| Q3 5:34 | Roughing the Passer on Miami, 15 yards, wiping out the play | 0% WAKE +4.5 pts |
| Q3 4:02 | Holding on Miami, 22 yards | 0% WAKE +1.4 pts |
| Q4 13:27 | Holding on Wake Forest, 10 yards | 0% MIA +0.6 pts |
| Q4 7:14 | Holding on Wake Forest, 10 yards | 0% MIA +0.6 pts |
| Q4 6:29 | Holding on Wake Forest, 10 yards | 0% MIA +0.8 pts |
| Q4 3:07 | Offside on Miami, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% WAKE +1.1 pts |
| Q4 2:00 | Offside on Wake Forest, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% MIA +0.6 pts |
When it happened
Wake Forest’s chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 11:32 | Miami converted 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 45% expected | +1% MIA | MIA: Touchdown |
| 2 | Q1 10:06 | Face Mask on Wake Forest, 15 yardsJudgment calls | +0% MIA | MIA: Touchdown |
| 3 | Q1 9:44 | Illegal Block on Miami, 10 yardsJudgment calls | +1% WAKE | WAKE: Touchdown |
| 4 | Q1 6:18 | Pass Interference on Wake Forest, 10 yards, wiping out the playJudgment calls | +1% MIA | MIA: Touchdown |
| 5 | Q1 3:58 | Roughing the Passer on Miami, 15 yardsJudgment calls | +1% WAKE | WAKE: Touchdown |
| 6 | Q2 11:40 | Wake Forest was stopped on 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 44% expected | +1% MIA | WAKE: Punt |
| 7 | Q4 9:20 | Wake Forest was stopped on 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 44% expected | +1% MIA | WAKE: Turnover on downs |
| 8 | Q4 8:51 | Wake Forest was stopped on 4th & 53rd & 4th downs · 43% expected | +1% MIA | WAKE: Turnover on downs |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Miami 100% · Wake Forest 0%
- Final margin
- Miami by 13
- Luck in points
- 1.0 for Wake Forest
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Miami by 14.0
- Replay with same day's form
- Miami 83% · Wake Forest 17% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 3 2026 games ·
Miami ·
Wake Forest
More from Week 3 2026
- Virginia Tech at Maryland VT 35–26 · replay 47% for the winner
- SMU at Louisville LOU 41–31 · replay 69% for the winner
- North Carolina at Clemson CLEM 28–20 · replay 70% for the winner
- NC State at Vanderbilt VAN 35–31 · replay 77% for the winner
- Florida State at Alabama ALA 50–36 · replay 77% for the winner
- Syracuse at Pittsburgh PITT 27–13 · replay 88% for the winner
- Maine at Boston College BC 22–16 · replay 90% for the winner
- West Virginia vs Virginia WVU 38–27 · replay 93% for the winner
- Mercer at Georgia Tech GT 44–11 · replay 98% for the winner
- Stanford at Duke DUKE 35–7 · replay 99% for the winner
- Wagner at California CAL 49–7 · replay 100% for the winner
- Arizona State vs Kansas ASU 24–17 · replay 8% for the winner