Week 1 2026 · September 5, 2026
Mississippi Valley State at Sacramento State, Week 1 2026: who deserved to win?
Sacramento State beat Mississippi Valley State 52–0, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, Sacramento State wins 10 of 10.
Before kickoff Sacramento State was a 99% favorite.
Final
| 0 | |
| 52 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index 0 Sacramento State about even · 0 Mississippi Valley State
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Mississippi Valley State wins 0, Sacramento State wins 10.
- 1 MVSU 3 SAC 10
- 2 MVSU 0 SAC 16
- 3 MVSU 3 SAC 23
- 4 MVSU 0 SAC 23
- 5 MVSU 0 SAC 27
- 6 MVSU 0 SAC 29
- 7 MVSU 10 SAC 42
- 8 MVSU 3 SAC 38
- 9 MVSU 3 SAC 44
- 10 MVSU 0 SAC 49
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Mississippi Valley State wins 0% of them, Sacramento State 100%. The line is what actually happened: Sacramento State by 52.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Mississippi Valley State by 17+ | 0.0% |
| Mississippi Valley State by 9–16 | 0.0% |
| Mississippi Valley State by 1–8 | 0.1% |
| Level after regulation | 0.1% |
| Sacramento State by 1–8 | 1.2% |
| Sacramento State by 9–16 | 4.9% |
| Sacramento State by 17+ | 93.7% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
No play in this game swung win probability by luck.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- L. Sari, 41 yds missed · 71% expected
- G. Meadors, 25 yds made · 91% expected
- G. Meadors, 22 yds missed · 93% expected
Penalties: Mississippi Valley State 10 for 113 yards, Sacramento State 3 for 30 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 9:08 | Delay of Game on Mississippi Valley State, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% MVSU +0.6 pts |
| Q1 9:06 | Holding on Sacramento State, 10 yards | 0% MVSU +1.4 pts |
| Q1 7:06 | Personal Foul on Mississippi Valley State, 15 yards | 0% SAC +2.0 pts |
| Q1 0:13 | Personal Foul on Mississippi Valley State, 15 yards | 0% SAC +1.6 pts |
| Q2 12:55 | Roughing the Passer on Mississippi Valley State, 13 yards | 0% SAC +0.3 pts |
| Q2 11:07 | Pass Interference on Mississippi Valley State, 15 yards | 0% SAC +0.8 pts |
| Q2 10:27 | False Start on Sacramento State, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% MVSU +0.8 pts |
| Q2 6:50 | Delay of Game on Mississippi Valley State, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% SAC +0.6 pts |
| Q2 5:58 | Personal Foul on Mississippi Valley State, 15 yards, wiping out the play | 0% SAC +1.1 pts |
| Q2 0:23 | Personal Foul on Mississippi Valley State, 10 yards | 0% SAC +0.1 pts |
| Q3 0:49 | Illegal Formation on Mississippi Valley State, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% SAC +1.3 pts |
| Q3 0:25 | Roughing the Passer on Sacramento State, 15 yards | 0% MVSU +1.6 pts |
| Q4 1:47 | Unsportsmanlike Conduct on Mississippi Valley State, 15 yards | 0% SAC +1.6 pts |
When it happened
Sacramento State’s chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 14:05 | Sacramento State was stopped on 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 30% expected | +0% MVSU | SAC: Punt |
| 2 | Q1 12:26 | Mississippi Valley State was stopped on 3rd & 73rd & 4th downs · 32% expected | +0% SAC | MVSU: Punt |
| 3 | Q1 10:52 | Sacramento State converted 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 37% expected | +0% SAC | SAC: Turnover |
| 4 | Q1 9:06 | Holding on Sacramento State, 10 yardsJudgment calls | +0% MVSU | MVSU: Missed field goal |
| 5 | Q1 7:10 | Mississippi Valley State was stopped on 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 35% expected | +0% SAC | MVSU: Missed field goal |
| 6 | Q1 7:06 | L. Sari missed a 41-yard field goalKicks · 71% expected for himPersonal Foul on Mississippi Valley State, 15 yardsJudgment calls | +0% SAC | MVSU: Punt |
| 7 | Q1 5:41 | Sacramento State was stopped on 3rd & 23rd & 4th downs · 66% expected | +0% MVSU | SAC: Punt |
| 8 | Q2 5:58 | Personal Foul on Mississippi Valley State, 15 yards, wiping out the playJudgment calls | +0% SAC | SAC: Missed field goal |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Mississippi Valley State 0% · Sacramento State 100%
- Final margin
- Sacramento State by 52
- Luck in points
- 7.2 for Sacramento State
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Sacramento State by 44.8
- Replay with same day's form
- Mississippi Valley State 0% · Sacramento State 100% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 1 2026 games ·
Mississippi Valley State ·
Sacramento State
More from Week 1 2026
- Toledo at Michigan State MSU 30–20 · replay 49% for the winner
- San José State at Eastern Michigan SJSU 27–21 · replay 65% for the winner
- Massachusetts at Rutgers MASS 37–21 · replay 74% for the winner
- Tarleton State at Bowling Green TAR 20–13 · replay 77% for the winner
- UAlbany at Buffalo BUF 21–17 · replay 82% for the winner
- Western Michigan at Michigan MICH 13–12 · replay 86% for the winner
- Akron at Wake Forest WAKE 38–16 · replay 92% for the winner
- Ohio at Nebraska NEB 49–21 · replay 93% for the winner
- Miami (OH) at Pittsburgh PITT 59–14 · replay 96% for the winner
- Sacramento State at Eastern Michigan EMU 28–17 · replay 96% for the winner
- Central Michigan at New Mexico UNM 38–7 · replay 99% for the winner
- Kent State at South Carolina SC 57–0 · replay 100% for the winner