Week 1 2026 · September 5, 2026
Miami (OH) at Pittsburgh, Week 1 2026: who deserved to win?
Pittsburgh beat Miami (OH) 59–14, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, Pittsburgh wins 10 of 10.
Before kickoff Pittsburgh was an 86% favorite.
Final
| 14 | |
| 59 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +4 Pittsburgh about even · −4 Miami (OH)
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Miami (OH) wins 0, Pittsburgh wins 10.
- 1 M-OH 35 PITT 41
- 2 M-OH 28 PITT 40
- 3 M-OH 7 PITT 24
- 4 M-OH 17 PITT 38
- 5 M-OH 14 PITT 38
- 6 M-OH 24 PITT 51
- 7 M-OH 21 PITT 51
- 8 M-OH 0 PITT 33
- 9 M-OH 21 PITT 58
- 10 M-OH 3 PITT 48
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Miami (OH) wins 4% of them, Pittsburgh 96%, counting the 1% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Pittsburgh by 45.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Miami (OH) by 17+ | 0.4% |
| Miami (OH) by 9–16 | 1.0% |
| Miami (OH) by 1–8 | 2.0% |
| Level after regulation | 0.8% |
| Pittsburgh by 1–8 | 7.9% |
| Pittsburgh by 9–16 | 10.9% |
| Pittsburgh by 17+ | 77.1% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
Penalties: Miami (OH) 9 for 78 yards, Pittsburgh 5 for 38 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 12:49 | Face Mask on Miami (OH), 15 yards | +2% PITT +1.6 pts |
| Q1 11:45 | Illegal Motion on Pittsburgh, 5 yards, wiping out the play · pre-snap | +1% M-OH +0.3 pts |
| Q1 9:10 | False Start on Miami (OH), 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% PITT +0.8 pts |
| Q1 6:01 | Holding on Miami (OH), 10 yards | +1% PITT +1.1 pts |
| Q1 4:44 | Offside on Pittsburgh, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% M-OH +0.8 pts |
| Q2 14:18 | False Start on Miami (OH), 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% PITT +0.5 pts |
| Q2 5:05 | Intentional Grounding on Miami (OH), 0 yards | 0% PITT 0.0 pts |
| Q2 3:53 | Holding on Pittsburgh, 8 yards, wiping out the play | +1% M-OH +1.5 pts |
| Q2 1:22 | Pass Interference on Pittsburgh, 15 yards | +1% M-OH +1.0 pts |
| Q2 0:32 | False Start on Pittsburgh, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% M-OH +0.2 pts |
| Q2 0:25 | Personal Foul on Miami (OH), 15 yards | +1% PITT +1.6 pts |
| Q3 7:07 | Unnecessary Roughness on Miami (OH), 13 yards | 0% PITT +0.8 pts |
| Q3 2:34 | False Start on Miami (OH), 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% PITT +0.9 pts |
| Q4 8:26 | Holding on Miami (OH), 10 yards | 0% PITT +0.6 pts |
When it happened
Pittsburgh’s chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 12:49 | Face Mask on Miami (OH), 15 yardsJudgment calls | +2% PITT | PITT: Touchdown |
| 2 | Q1 10:28 | Pittsburgh converted 3rd & 113rd & 4th downs · 30% expected | +1% M-OH | PITT: Touchdown |
| 3 | Q1 6:10 | Pittsburgh fumbled and recovered itFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +1% PITT | PITT: Touchdown |
| 4 | Q1 4:55 | Pittsburgh converted 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 48% expected | +1% PITT | PITT: Touchdown |
| 5 | Q2 11:08 | Miami (OH) converted 4th & 93rd & 4th downs · 28% expected | +1% M-OH | M-OH: Touchdown |
| 6 | Q2 9:03 | Pittsburgh was stopped on 3rd & 33rd & 4th downs · 60% expected | +1% M-OH | PITT: Punt |
| 7 | Q2 5:54 | Miami (OH) converted 3rd & 123rd & 4th downs · 23% expected | +1% M-OH | M-OH: Punt |
| 8 | Q2 0:00 | A. Chadha made a 58-yard field goalKicks · 41% expected for him, 0 of 0 from 45+ before | +1% PITT | PITT: Touchdown |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Miami (OH) 0% · Pittsburgh 100%
- Final margin
- Pittsburgh by 45
- Luck in points
- 4.0 for Pittsburgh
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Pittsburgh by 41.0
- Replay with same day's form
- Miami (OH) 4% · Pittsburgh 96% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 1 2026 games ·
Miami (OH) ·
Pittsburgh
More from Week 1 2026
- Colorado at Georgia Tech COLO 14–13 · replay 19% for the winner
- Toledo at Michigan State MSU 30–20 · replay 49% for the winner
- Louisville vs Ole Miss MISS 41–38 · replay 57% for the winner
- San José State at Eastern Michigan SJSU 27–21 · replay 65% for the winner
- Massachusetts at Rutgers MASS 37–21 · replay 74% for the winner
- North Carolina vs TCU UNC 15–10 · replay 75% for the winner
- Tarleton State at Bowling Green TAR 20–13 · replay 77% for the winner
- New Mexico State at Florida State FSU 34–17 · replay 82% for the winner
- UAlbany at Buffalo BUF 21–17 · replay 82% for the winner
- Western Michigan at Michigan MICH 13–12 · replay 86% for the winner
- Boston College at Cincinnati CIN 34–15 · replay 89% for the winner
- Akron at Wake Forest WAKE 38–16 · replay 92% for the winner