Week 1 2026 · September 3, 2026
UAlbany at Buffalo, Week 1 2026: who deserved to win?
Buffalo beat UAlbany 21–17, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, Buffalo wins 8 of 10.
Before kickoff Buffalo was an 88% favorite. The biggest swing (Q4, 6:43 left): Buffalo converted 3rd & 10, worth 9 points of win probability to Buffalo.
Final
| 17 | |
| 21 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +18 Buffalo about even · −18 UAlbany
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. UAlbany wins 2, Buffalo wins 8.
- 1 UALB 26 BUF 13
- 2 UALB 19 BUF 16
- 3 UALB 17 BUF 20
- 4 UALB 14 BUF 20
- 5 UALB 12 BUF 21
- 6 UALB 7 BUF 20
- 7 UALB 16 BUF 31
- 8 UALB 0 BUF 19
- 9 UALB 3 BUF 27
- 10 UALB 0 BUF 31
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
UAlbany wins 18% of them, Buffalo 82%, counting the 2% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Buffalo by 4.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| UAlbany by 17+ | 1.7% |
| UAlbany by 9–16 | 5.9% |
| UAlbany by 1–8 | 8.8% |
| Level after regulation | 1.8% |
| Buffalo by 1–8 | 23.4% |
| Buffalo by 9–16 | 18.9% |
| Buffalo by 17+ | 39.5% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
Penalties: UAlbany 8 for 66 yards, Buffalo 9 for 105 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 8:45 | Roughing the Kicker on UAlbany, 15 yards | +4% BUF +4.1 pts |
| Q1 8:45 | Holding on Buffalo, 10 yards | +1% UALB +1.0 pts |
| Q1 8:45 | False Start on Buffalo, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% UALB +1.0 pts |
| Q1 5:15 | Roughing the Passer on Buffalo, 15 yards | +2% UALB +1.6 pts |
| Q2 10:24 | False Start on Buffalo, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% UALB +0.9 pts |
| Q2 6:59 | Unnecessary Roughness on UAlbany, 8 yards | 0% BUF +0.3 pts |
| Q2 6:59 | Delay of Game on UAlbany, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% BUF +0.4 pts |
| Q2 5:13 | Roughing the Passer on UAlbany, 8 yards | +1% BUF +0.7 pts |
| Q2 0:46 | Roughing the Passer on Buffalo, 15 yards | +2% UALB +1.6 pts |
| Q2 0:46 | Delay of Game on UAlbany, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% BUF +0.6 pts |
| Q3 11:50 | Roughing the Passer on Buffalo, 15 yards | +3% UALB +1.6 pts |
| Q3 2:02 | Pass Interference on Buffalo, 15 yards | +4% UALB +1.1 pts |
| Q4 15:00 | Personal Foul on Buffalo, 15 yards | +3% UALB +0.9 pts |
| Q4 6:43 | Holding on UAlbany, 10 yards | +4% BUF +0.6 pts |
| Q4 6:43 | Holding on Buffalo, 10 yards | +6% UALB +1.1 pts |
| Q4 4:53 | Holding on UAlbany, 10 yards | +6% BUF +1.2 pts |
| Q4 1:19 | False Start on UAlbany, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% BUF +1.1 pts |
When it happened
Buffalo’s chance of winning
As low as 41% and as high as 100%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 5:15 | UAlbany converted 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 38% expectedRoughing the Passer on Buffalo, 15 yardsJudgment calls | +5% UALB | UALB: Touchdown |
| 2 | Q3 4:33 | UAlbany was stopped on 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 27% expectedBuffalo fumbled and UAlbany recoveredFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +7% UALB | UALB: Touchdown |
| 3 | Q4 15:00 | Buffalo was stopped on 3rd & 193rd & 4th downs · 16% expectedPersonal Foul on Buffalo, 15 yardsJudgment calls | +8% UALB | BUF: Punt |
| 4 | Q4 13:02 | UAlbany was stopped on 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 37% expected | +4% BUF | UALB: Punt |
| 5 | Q4 11:34 | Buffalo was stopped on 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 41% expected | +8% UALB | BUF: Punt |
| 6 | Q4 7:00 | UAlbany was stopped on 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 27% expected | +5% BUF | UALB: Punt |
| 7 | Q4 6:43 | Buffalo converted 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 27% expectedHolding on UAlbany, 10 yardsJudgment callsHolding on Buffalo, 10 yardsJudgment calls | +9% BUF | BUF: Touchdown |
| 8 | Q4 4:53 | Holding on UAlbany, 10 yardsJudgment calls | +6% BUF | BUF: End of game |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
UAlbany 42% · Buffalo 58%
- Final margin
- Buffalo by 4
- Luck in points
- 2.6 for Buffalo
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Buffalo by 1.4
- Replay with same day's form
- UAlbany 18% · Buffalo 82% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 1 2026 games ·
UAlbany ·
Buffalo
More from Week 1 2026
- Toledo at Michigan State MSU 30–20 · replay 49% for the winner
- San José State at Eastern Michigan SJSU 27–21 · replay 65% for the winner
- Massachusetts at Rutgers MASS 37–21 · replay 74% for the winner
- Tarleton State at Bowling Green TAR 20–13 · replay 77% for the winner
- Western Michigan at Michigan MICH 13–12 · replay 86% for the winner
- Akron at Wake Forest WAKE 38–16 · replay 92% for the winner
- Ohio at Nebraska NEB 49–21 · replay 93% for the winner
- Rhode Island at Temple TEM 38–14 · replay 95% for the winner
- Miami (OH) at Pittsburgh PITT 59–14 · replay 96% for the winner
- Sacramento State at Eastern Michigan EMU 28–17 · replay 96% for the winner
- Towson at Navy NAVY 42–15 · replay 97% for the winner
- Central Michigan at New Mexico UNM 38–7 · replay 99% for the winner