Week 1 2026 · September 4, 2026
San José State at Eastern Michigan, Week 1 2026: who deserved to win?
San José State beat Eastern Michigan 27–21, and the replays lean its way: with the same day's form, it wins 7 of 10. Eastern Michigan had the bounces: pre-snap flags alone were worth 26 points of win probability to Eastern Michigan.
Before kickoff Eastern Michigan was a 54% favorite. The biggest swing (Q3, 0:53 left): Return touchdown by Eastern Michigan, worth 35 points of win probability to Eastern Michigan.
Final
| 27 | |
| 21 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +35 San José State lucky · −35 Eastern Michigan
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. San José State wins 7, Eastern Michigan wins 3.
- 1 SJSU 34 EMU 3
- 2 SJSU 30 EMU 7
- 3 SJSU 25 EMU 7
- 4 SJSU 17 EMU 3
- 5 SJSU 17 EMU 7
- 6 SJSU 16 EMU 9
- 7 SJSU 13 EMU 10
- 8 SJSU 10 EMU 13
- 9 SJSU 3 EMU 12
- 10 SJSU 3 EMU 21
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
San José State wins 65% of them, Eastern Michigan 35%, counting the 5% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: San José State by 6.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| San José State by 17+ | 25.6% |
| San José State by 9–16 | 20.0% |
| San José State by 1–8 | 18.7% |
| Level after regulation | 4.8% |
| Eastern Michigan by 1–8 | 15.5% |
| Eastern Michigan by 9–16 | 9.3% |
| Eastern Michigan by 17+ | 6.2% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- T. Sinatra, 45 yds made · 63% expected
- T. Sinatra, 49 yds made · 56% expected
Penalties: San José State 13 for 100 yards, Eastern Michigan 4 for 35 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 12:41 | False Start on Eastern Michigan, 5 yards · pre-snap | +4% SJSU +1.9 pts |
| Q1 12:02 | False Start on San José State, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% EMU +0.1 pts |
| Q1 10:22 | Delay of Game on San José State, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% EMU +0.7 pts |
| Q1 5:09 | False Start on Eastern Michigan, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% SJSU +2.2 pts |
| Q2 13:20 | Holding on San José State, 10 yards | +3% EMU +1.2 pts |
| Q2 7:17 | Holding on San José State, 10 yards | +4% EMU +1.7 pts |
| Q2 5:20 | Delay of Game on San José State, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% EMU +0.3 pts |
| Q2 3:17 | Pass Interference on San José State, 15 yards | +3% EMU +1.2 pts |
| Q2 1:47 | False Start on San José State, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% EMU +0.5 pts |
| Q2 0:01 | Unsportsmanlike Conduct on Eastern Michigan, 15 yards | +4% SJSU +1.4 pts |
| Q3 11:53 | Delay of Game on San José State, 5 yards · pre-snap | +21% EMU +1.1 pts |
| Q3 1:57 | Holding on San José State, 10 yards, wiping out the play | +10% EMU +2.6 pts |
| Q3 0:19 | Face Mask on San José State, 15 yards | +10% EMU +2.9 pts |
| Q4 14:48 | Holding on Eastern Michigan, 10 yards | +2% SJSU +0.6 pts |
| Q4 3:19 | Delay of Game on San José State, 5 yards · pre-snap | +2% EMU +0.3 pts |
| Q4 3:19 | False Start on San José State, 5 yards · pre-snap | +2% EMU +0.3 pts |
| Q4 1:55 | False Start on San José State, 5 yards · pre-snap | +3% EMU +0.7 pts |
When it happened
Eastern Michigan’s chance of winning
As low as 0% and as high as 76%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 2:19 | San José State was stopped on 4th & 13rd & 4th downs · 76% expected | +8% EMU | SJSU: Turnover |
| 2 | Q3 11:53 | Delay of Game on San José State, 5 yardsPre-snap flags | +21% EMU | EMU: Touchdown |
| 3 | Q3 8:25 | San José State converted 4th & 23rd & 4th downs · 62% expected | +7% SJSU | SJSU: Touchdown |
| 4 | Q3 1:57 | Holding on San José State, 10 yards, wiping out the playJudgment calls | +10% EMU | EMU: Punt |
| 5 | Q3 0:53 | San José State fumbled and Eastern Michigan recoveredFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50Return touchdown by Eastern MichiganSpecial teams | +35% EMU | SJSU: Punt |
| 6 | Q3 0:19 | Face Mask on San José State, 15 yardsJudgment calls | +10% EMU | EMU: Punt |
| 7 | Q4 9:28 | San José State converted 3rd & 73rd & 4th downs · 34% expected | +11% SJSU | SJSU: Punt |
| 8 | Q4 1:37 | T. Sinatra made a 49-yard field goalKicks · 56% expected for him, 1 of 1 from 45+ before | +6% SJSU | SJSU: End of game |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
San José State 38% · Eastern Michigan 62%
- Final margin
- San José State by 6
- Luck in points
- 8.3 for San José State
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Eastern Michigan by 2.3
- Replay with same day's form
- San José State 65% · Eastern Michigan 35% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 1 2026 games ·
San José State ·
Eastern Michigan
More from Week 1 2026
- Toledo at Michigan State MSU 30–20 · replay 49% for the winner
- Massachusetts at Rutgers MASS 37–21 · replay 74% for the winner
- Wyoming at Colorado State CSU 35–13 · replay 75% for the winner
- Tarleton State at Bowling Green TAR 20–13 · replay 77% for the winner
- UAlbany at Buffalo BUF 21–17 · replay 82% for the winner
- Memphis at UNLV MEM 27–21 · replay 84% for the winner
- Western Michigan at Michigan MICH 13–12 · replay 86% for the winner
- Akron at Wake Forest WAKE 38–16 · replay 92% for the winner
- Ohio at Nebraska NEB 49–21 · replay 93% for the winner
- UNLV at Hawai'i UNLV 21–6 · replay 95% for the winner
- Miami (OH) at Pittsburgh PITT 59–14 · replay 96% for the winner
- Sacramento State at Eastern Michigan EMU 28–17 · replay 96% for the winner