Week 2 2026 · September 12, 2026
Gardner-Webb at Liberty, Week 2 2026: who deserved to win?
Liberty beat Gardner-Webb 24–23, and the replays lean its way: with the same day's form, it wins 6 of 10. Gardner-Webb had the bounces: pre-snap flags alone were worth 10 points of win probability to Gardner-Webb.
Liberty won on an off day: its offense played far below its usual level. In a fresh game against Gardner-Webb it would win 95% of the time; with this day’s form, 63%. The numbers
Before kickoff Liberty was a 97% favorite. The biggest swing (Q4, 2:34 left): Liberty converted 3rd & 10, worth 22 points of win probability to Liberty.
Final
| 23 | |
| 24 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +37 Liberty lucky · −37 Gardner-Webb
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Gardner-Webb wins 4, Liberty wins 6.
- 1 GWEB 30 LIB 7
- 2 GWEB 38 LIB 24
- 3 GWEB 20 LIB 13
- 4 GWEB 23 LIB 20
- 5 GWEB 17 LIB 20
- 6 GWEB 31 LIB 37
- 7 GWEB 14 LIB 24
- 8 GWEB 13 LIB 27
- 9 GWEB 13 LIB 31
- 10 GWEB 17 LIB 44
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
Liberty won on an off day
Its offense played far below its usual level. In a fresh game against Gardner-Webb it would win 95% of the time; with this day’s form, 63%.
Same teams, fresh game
Replay with same day's form
33 points apart for Liberty: the gap is how differently this game went from what the two teams usually are.
| Unit | This game | Usual level | Better or worse than usual |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gardner-Webb offenseEPA per play gained | −0.20 | +0.06 | worse by 0.27 |
| Gardner-Webb defenseEPA per play allowed | −0.10 | +0.01 | better by 0.11 |
| Liberty offenseEPA per play gained | −0.10 | +0.09 | worse by 0.19 |
| Liberty defenseEPA per play allowed | −0.20 | +0.09 | better by 0.30 |
EPA (expected points added) per play on competitive snaps, turnovers left out because they are valued as luck. Usual level: the team’s earlier games this season plus half of last season, pulled toward the league average. One team’s defense and the other team’s offense are the same snaps, so one game can’t fully say whose day it was; it shows how far this one was from both teams’ norms.
How 4,000 replays ended
Gardner-Webb wins 37% of them, Liberty 63%, counting the 4% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Liberty by 1.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Gardner-Webb by 17+ | 9.7% |
| Gardner-Webb by 9–16 | 10.9% |
| Gardner-Webb by 1–8 | 15.3% |
| Level after regulation | 3.6% |
| Liberty by 1–8 | 20.9% |
| Liberty by 9–16 | 18.0% |
| Liberty by 17+ | 21.7% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- T. Simpson, 41 yds made · 71% expected
- T. Simpson, 35 yds made · 81% expected
- C. Reeves, 30 yds made · 87% expected
- T. Simpson, 27 yds made · 90% expected
Penalties: Gardner-Webb 5 for 27 yards, Liberty 11 for 96 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 14:54 | Pass Interference on Liberty, 15 yards | 0% GWEB +1.4 pts |
| Q1 14:43 | Personal Foul on Liberty, 15 yards | +1% GWEB +1.6 pts |
| Q1 9:43 | False Start on Gardner-Webb, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% LIB +1.1 pts |
| Q1 8:22 | Offside on Liberty, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% GWEB +0.7 pts |
| Q1 5:05 | Holding on Liberty, 10 yards | 0% GWEB +0.6 pts |
| Q2 14:53 | Holding on Liberty, 10 yards | 0% GWEB +1.3 pts |
| Q2 13:45 | False Start on Gardner-Webb, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% LIB +0.5 pts |
| Q2 6:45 | Offside on Liberty, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% GWEB +0.9 pts |
| Q2 1:43 | False Start on Gardner-Webb, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% LIB +0.3 pts |
| Q3 5:35 | Personal Foul on Liberty, 10 yards | +4% GWEB +1.3 pts |
| Q3 5:33 | Personal Foul on Liberty, 5 yards | +2% GWEB +0.6 pts |
| Q3 4:33 | Holding on Liberty, 6 yards | +7% GWEB +1.9 pts |
| Q4 13:23 | Illegal Formation on Gardner-Webb, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% LIB +0.3 pts |
| Q4 8:51 | Holding on Liberty, 10 yards, wiping out the play | +18% GWEB +3.3 pts |
| Q4 7:06 | Holding on Gardner-Webb, 7 yards | +5% LIB +1.1 pts |
| Q4 4:06 | Illegal Shift on Liberty, 5 yards · pre-snap | +10% GWEB +1.0 pts |
When it happened
Liberty’s chance of winning
As low as 18% and as high as 100%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q3 4:33 | Holding on Liberty, 6 yardsJudgment calls | +7% GWEB | GWEB: Field goal |
| 2 | Q4 14:50 | Gardner-Webb converted 3rd & 73rd & 4th downs · 31% expected | +9% GWEB | GWEB: Punt |
| 3 | Q4 12:29 | Liberty fumbled and Gardner-Webb recoveredFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +9% GWEB | LIB: Punt |
| 4 | Q4 8:51 | Holding on Liberty, 10 yards, wiping out the playJudgment calls | +18% GWEB | GWEB: Punt |
| 5 | Q4 4:06 | Illegal Shift on Liberty, 5 yardsPre-snap flags | +10% GWEB | GWEB: Turnover on downs |
| 6 | Q4 2:34 | Liberty converted 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 25% expected | +22% LIB | LIB: End of game |
| 7 | Q4 1:48 | Gardner-Webb was stopped on 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 25% expected | +8% LIB | GWEB: Turnover on downs |
| 8 | Q4 1:43 | Gardner-Webb was stopped on 4th & 103rd & 4th downs · 24% expected | +10% LIB | – |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Gardner-Webb 3% · Liberty 97%
- Final margin
- Liberty by 1
- Luck in points
- 11.0 for Gardner-Webb
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Liberty by 12.0
- Replay with same day's form
- Gardner-Webb 37% · Liberty 63% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 2 2026 games ·
Gardner-Webb ·
Liberty
More from Week 2 2026
- Jacksonville State at Ohio OHIO 29–27 · replay 27% for the winner
- Tulsa at Sam Houston TLSA 23–17 · replay 27% for the winner
- Middle Tennessee at Marshall MRSH 28–26 · replay 43% for the winner
- New Mexico State at Hawai'i HAW 29–19 · replay 44% for the winner
- Georgia State at Kennesaw State GAST 31–17 · replay 62% for the winner
- Delaware at Vanderbilt VAN 35–26 · replay 74% for the winner
- Western Illinois at Wisconsin WIS 36–9 · replay 95% for the winner
- Buffalo at Florida International FIU 33–20 · replay 95% for the winner
- UT Martin at West Virginia WVU 52–7 · replay 99% for the winner
- Western Kentucky at Georgia UGA 70–20 · replay 99% for the winner
- Lindenwood at Missouri State MOST 48–14 · replay 100% for the winner
- Illinois State at Northern Illinois ILST 28–24 · replay 17% for the winner