Week 2 2026 · September 12, 2026
Prairie View A&M at Baylor, Week 2 2026: who deserved to win?
Baylor beat Prairie View A&M 44–3, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, Baylor wins 10 of 10.
Before kickoff Baylor was a 99% favorite.
Final
| 3 | |
| 44 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index 0 Baylor about even · 0 Prairie View A&M
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Prairie View A&M wins 0, Baylor wins 10.
- 1 PV 0 BAY 35
- 2 PV 3 BAY 46
- 3 PV 3 BAY 50
- 4 PV 0 BAY 52
- 5 PV 7 BAY 62
- 6 PV 0 BAY 59
- 7 PV 0 BAY 62
- 8 PV 0 BAY 66
- 9 PV 0 BAY 71
- 10 PV 0 BAY 77
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Prairie View A&M wins 0% of them, Baylor 100%. The line is what actually happened: Baylor by 41.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Prairie View A&M by 17+ | 0.0% |
| Prairie View A&M by 9–16 | 0.0% |
| Prairie View A&M by 1–8 | 0.1% |
| Level after regulation | 0.0% |
| Baylor by 1–8 | 0.3% |
| Baylor by 9–16 | 1.3% |
| Baylor by 17+ | 98.4% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
No play in this game swung win probability by luck.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- E. Eddins, 25 yds made · 91% expected
- R. Armstrong, 46 yds made · 60% expected
- R. Armstrong, 45 yds made · 62% expected
- R. Armstrong, 41 yds missed · 71% expected
- R. Armstrong, 22 yds made · 92% expected
Penalties: Prairie View A&M 9 for 72 yards, Baylor 9 for 100 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 14:58 | Pass Interference on Baylor, 15 yards | 0% PV +3.4 pts |
| Q1 14:54 | False Start on Prairie View A&M, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% BAY +0.9 pts |
| Q1 8:48 | False Start on Baylor, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% PV +2.2 pts |
| Q1 4:16 | Personal Foul on Baylor, 15 yards | 0% PV +1.6 pts |
| Q1 1:33 | Delay of Game on Prairie View A&M, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% BAY +0.6 pts |
| Q2 11:10 | Delay of Game on Prairie View A&M, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% BAY +1.1 pts |
| Q2 8:17 | Delay of Game on Prairie View A&M, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% BAY +0.1 pts |
| Q2 0:39 | False Start on Baylor, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% PV +0.4 pts |
| Q3 8:57 | Personal Foul on Baylor, 15 yards | 0% PV +1.2 pts |
| Q3 7:53 | Personal Foul on Prairie View A&M, 15 yards | 0% BAY +0.9 pts |
| Q3 5:38 | Holding on Baylor, 10 yards | 0% PV +3.2 pts |
| Q3 5:19 | False Start on Baylor, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% PV +2.0 pts |
| Q3 1:17 | Holding on Prairie View A&M, 10 yards | 0% BAY +3.6 pts |
| Q4 10:15 | Face Mask on Prairie View A&M, 8 yards | 0% BAY +1.7 pts |
| Q4 10:02 | Encroachment on Prairie View A&M, 4 yards · pre-snap | 0% BAY +0.4 pts |
| Q4 7:00 | Illegal Block on Baylor, 25 yards | 0% PV +2.3 pts |
| Q4 5:43 | False Start on Baylor, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% PV +1.0 pts |
| Q4 0:13 | Face Mask on Prairie View A&M, 15 yards | 0% BAY +1.6 pts |
When it happened
Baylor’s chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 14:58 | Pass Interference on Baylor, 15 yardsJudgment calls | +0% PV | PV: Field goal |
| 2 | Q1 13:44 | Prairie View A&M converted 3rd & 133rd & 4th downs · 20% expected | +0% PV | PV: Field goal |
| 3 | Q1 12:12 | Prairie View A&M converted 3rd & 93rd & 4th downs · 27% expected | +0% PV | PV: Field goal |
| 4 | Q1 10:58 | E. Eddins made a 25-yard field goalKicks · 91% expected for him | +0% BAY | PV: Punt |
| 5 | Q1 8:48 | False Start on Baylor, 5 yardsPre-snap flags | +0% PV | PV: Punt |
| 6 | Q1 8:25 | Baylor was stopped on 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 37% expected | +0% PV | BAY: Field goal |
| 7 | Q1 8:20 | R. Armstrong made a 46-yard field goalKicks · 60% expected for him, 0 of 0 from 45+ before | +0% BAY | BAY: Touchdown |
| 8 | Q1 4:22 | Baylor converted 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 34% expected | +0% BAY | BAY: Touchdown |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Prairie View A&M 0% · Baylor 100%
- Final margin
- Baylor by 41
- Luck in points
- 4.7 for Baylor
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Baylor by 36.3
- Replay with same day's form
- Prairie View A&M 0% · Baylor 100% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 2 2026 games ·
Prairie View A&M ·
Baylor
More from Week 2 2026
- Texas Tech at Oregon State TTU 35–24 · replay 27% for the winner
- Arizona State at Texas A&M TA&M 48–20 · replay 45% for the winner
- UCF at Pittsburgh PITT 12–7 · replay 58% for the winner
- Iowa State at Iowa IOWA 16–13 · replay 76% for the winner
- Arizona at BYU BYU 28–17 · replay 82% for the winner
- Missouri at Kansas MIZ 38–21 · replay 89% for the winner
- Alabama State at Troy TROY 34–17 · replay 95% for the winner
- Oregon at Oklahoma State OKST 39–31 · replay 96% for the winner
- Weber State at Colorado COLO 52–21 · replay 97% for the winner
- Western Carolina at Cincinnati CIN 62–10 · replay 98% for the winner
- Arkansas at Utah UTAH 43–10 · replay 99% for the winner
- UT Martin at West Virginia WVU 52–7 · replay 99% for the winner