Week 4 2026 · September 26, 2026
Bucknell at Pittsburgh, Week 4 2026: who deserved to win?
Pittsburgh beat Bucknell 59–0, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, Pittsburgh wins 10 of 10.
Before kickoff Pittsburgh was a 100% favorite.
Final
| 0 | |
| 59 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index 0 Pittsburgh about even · 0 Bucknell
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Bucknell wins 0, Pittsburgh wins 10.
- 1 BUCK 17 PITT 33
- 2 BUCK 7 PITT 31
- 3 BUCK 6 PITT 35
- 4 BUCK 10 PITT 44
- 5 BUCK 0 PITT 36
- 6 BUCK 3 PITT 43
- 7 BUCK 7 PITT 52
- 8 BUCK 3 PITT 51
- 9 BUCK 7 PITT 59
- 10 BUCK 3 PITT 66
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Bucknell wins 0% of them, Pittsburgh 100%. The line is what actually happened: Pittsburgh by 59.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Bucknell by 17+ | 0.0% |
| Bucknell by 9–16 | 0.0% |
| Bucknell by 1–8 | 0.1% |
| Level after regulation | 0.0% |
| Pittsburgh by 1–8 | 1.1% |
| Pittsburgh by 9–16 | 2.1% |
| Pittsburgh by 17+ | 96.7% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
No play in this game swung win probability by luck.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- J. Garanton, 43 yds missed · 67% expected
- A. Chadha, 24 yds made · 93% expected
Penalties: Bucknell 6 for 48 yards, Pittsburgh 16 for 165 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 13:35 | False Start on Bucknell, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% PITT +0.9 pts |
| Q1 10:49 | False Start on Bucknell, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% PITT +0.8 pts |
| Q1 10:02 | Pass Interference on Pittsburgh, 15 yards | 0% BUCK +3.0 pts |
| Q1 9:59 | Offside on Pittsburgh, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% BUCK +2.5 pts |
| Q1 9:30 | Face Mask on Pittsburgh, 15 yards | 0% BUCK +1.0 pts |
| Q1 9:12 | Holding on Bucknell, 10 yards | 0% PITT +0.6 pts |
| Q1 4:05 | Roughing the Passer on Bucknell, 8 yards | 0% PITT +1.2 pts |
| Q1 2:06 | Roughing the Passer on Pittsburgh, 15 yards | 0% BUCK +1.9 pts |
| Q1 0:39 | Holding on Pittsburgh, 10 yards | 0% BUCK +2.4 pts |
| Q2 12:36 | Holding on Pittsburgh, 10 yards | 0% BUCK +0.9 pts |
| Q2 1:50 | False Start on Bucknell, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% PITT +0.2 pts |
| Q2 1:41 | Holding on Pittsburgh, 10 yards | 0% BUCK +0.6 pts |
| Q3 15:00 | Holding on Pittsburgh, 10 yards | 0% BUCK +0.6 pts |
| Q3 10:43 | Holding on Pittsburgh, 10 yards | 0% BUCK +1.4 pts |
| Q3 8:02 | Holding on Pittsburgh, 10 yards | 0% BUCK +0.6 pts |
| Q3 5:43 | False Start on Pittsburgh, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% BUCK +1.2 pts |
| Q3 5:15 | Delay of Game on Pittsburgh, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% BUCK +0.3 pts |
| Q3 1:28 | False Start on Pittsburgh, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% BUCK +0.5 pts |
| Q3 1:27 | Holding on Pittsburgh, 10 yards, wiping out the play | 0% BUCK +1.3 pts |
| Q3 0:51 | Face Mask on Bucknell, 15 yards | 0% PITT +1.6 pts |
| Q4 13:20 | Unsportsmanlike Conduct on Pittsburgh, 15 yards | 0% BUCK +0.9 pts |
| Q4 6:40 | Pass Interference on Pittsburgh, 15 yards | 0% BUCK +0.8 pts |
When it happened
Pittsburgh’s chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 14:03 | Bucknell was stopped on 3rd & 113rd & 4th downs · 21% expected | +0% PITT | BUCK: Punt |
| 2 | Q1 12:44 | Pittsburgh converted 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 30% expected | +0% PITT | PITT: Touchdown |
| 3 | Q1 11:49 | Pittsburgh was stopped on 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 30% expected | +0% PITT | PITT: Touchdown |
| 4 | Q1 11:26 | Pittsburgh converted 4th & 33rd & 4th downs · 56% expected | +0% PITT | PITT: Touchdown |
| 5 | Q1 9:12 | Holding on Bucknell, 10 yardsJudgment calls | +0% PITT | PITT: Touchdown |
| 6 | Q1 7:24 | Bucknell was stopped on 3rd & 73rd & 4th downs · 30% expected | +0% PITT | BUCK: Punt |
| 7 | Q1 6:02 | Pittsburgh converted 3rd & 13rd & 4th downs · 79% expected | +0% PITT | PITT: Touchdown |
| 8 | Q1 2:52 | Pittsburgh converted 3rd & 33rd & 4th downs · 50% expected | +0% PITT | PITT: Touchdown |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Bucknell 0% · Pittsburgh 100%
- Final margin
- Pittsburgh by 59
- Luck in points
- 6.3 for Pittsburgh
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Pittsburgh by 52.7
- Replay with same day's form
- Bucknell 0% · Pittsburgh 100% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 4 2026 games ·
Bucknell ·
Pittsburgh
More from Week 4 2026
- Wake Forest at Louisville WAKE 30–27 · replay 38% for the winner
- App State at NC State NCSU 41–31 · replay 53% for the winner
- Georgia Tech at Stanford STAN 34–27 · replay 59% for the winner
- Clemson at California CLEM 24–10 · replay 73% for the winner
- Virginia Tech at Boston College VT 21–14 · replay 81% for the winner
- Missouri State at SMU SMU 34–24 · replay 99% for the winner
- Central Arkansas at Florida State FSU 34–7 · replay 100% for the winner
- William & Mary at Duke DUKE 62–7 · replay 100% for the winner
- Delaware at Virginia UVA 42–3 · replay 100% for the winner
- Central Michigan at Miami MIA 52–3 · replay 100% for the winner
- Army at Temple ARMY 21–17 · replay 9% for the winner
- Iowa at Michigan IOWA 20–19 · replay 13% for the winner