Week 4 2026 · September 26, 2026
Central Michigan at Miami, Week 4 2026: who deserved to win?
Miami beat Central Michigan 52–3, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, Miami wins 10 of 10.
Before kickoff Miami was a 100% favorite.
Final
| 3 | |
| 52 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index 0 Miami about even · 0 Central Michigan
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Central Michigan wins 0, Miami wins 10.
- 1 CMU 11 MIA 35
- 2 CMU 9 MIA 44
- 3 CMU 0 MIA 38
- 4 CMU 0 MIA 41
- 5 CMU 3 MIA 48
- 6 CMU 0 MIA 48
- 7 CMU 0 MIA 51
- 8 CMU 0 MIA 55
- 9 CMU 7 MIA 65
- 10 CMU 0 MIA 63
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Central Michigan wins 0% of them, Miami 100%. The line is what actually happened: Miami by 49.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Central Michigan by 17+ | 0.0% |
| Central Michigan by 9–16 | 0.0% |
| Central Michigan by 1–8 | 0.1% |
| Level after regulation | 0.1% |
| Miami by 1–8 | 0.6% |
| Miami by 9–16 | 2.2% |
| Miami by 17+ | 97.1% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
No play in this game swung win probability by luck.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- C. VanHuis, 49 yds made · 55% expected
- J. Weinberg, 33 yds made · 83% expected
Penalties: Central Michigan 6 for 36 yards, Miami 13 for 107 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 14:07 | False Start on Miami, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% CMU +0.8 pts |
| Q1 12:57 | False Start on Miami, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% CMU +0.3 pts |
| Q1 8:07 | Roughing the Passer on Miami, 15 yards | 0% CMU +1.6 pts |
| Q1 3:06 | Illegal Formation on Miami, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% CMU +0.9 pts |
| Q1 2:20 | Block Below the Waist on Central Michigan, 5 yards | 0% MIA +1.0 pts |
| Q2 13:08 | Delay of Game on Central Michigan, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% MIA +0.4 pts |
| Q2 11:12 | False Start on Miami, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% CMU +0.8 pts |
| Q2 9:43 | Holding on Central Michigan, 10 yards | 0% MIA +1.0 pts |
| Q2 1:36 | Holding on Miami, 3 yards | 0% CMU +0.2 pts |
| Q2 0:54 | Holding on Miami, 10 yards | 0% CMU +1.3 pts |
| Q2 0:46 | Holding on Miami, 10 yards, wiping out the play | 0% CMU +2.2 pts |
| Q2 0:36 | Holding on Central Michigan, 10 yards | 0% MIA 0.0 pts |
| Q2 0:19 | False Start on Miami, 4 yards · pre-snap | 0% CMU +0.9 pts |
| Q3 15:00 | Illegal Shift on Central Michigan, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% MIA +1.5 pts |
| Q3 9:42 | Personal Foul on Miami, 15 yards | 0% CMU +0.9 pts |
| Q3 8:14 | Pass Interference on Miami, 10 yards, wiping out the play | 0% CMU +2.6 pts |
| Q3 6:08 | Pass Interference on Central Michigan, 1 yard | 0% MIA +0.3 pts |
| Q4 14:19 | Face Mask on Miami, 15 yards | 0% CMU +0.9 pts |
| Q4 1:16 | False Start on Miami, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% CMU +0.5 pts |
When it happened
Miami’s chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 13:43 | Miami converted 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 42% expected | +0% MIA | MIA: Punt |
| 2 | Q1 9:54 | Central Michigan converted 3rd & 33rd & 4th downs · 51% expected | +0% CMU | CMU: Field goal |
| 3 | Q1 8:40 | Central Michigan converted 3rd & 13rd & 4th downs · 73% expected | +0% CMU | CMU: Field goal |
| 4 | Q1 8:07 | Roughing the Passer on Miami, 15 yardsJudgment calls | +0% CMU | CMU: Field goal |
| 5 | Q1 6:30 | Central Michigan was stopped on 3rd & 83rd & 4th downs · 29% expected | +0% MIA | CMU: Field goal |
| 6 | Q1 5:56 | C. VanHuis made a 49-yard field goalKicks · 55% expected for him, 0 of 0 from 45+ before | +0% CMU | CMU: Punt |
| 7 | Q1 3:06 | Illegal Formation on Miami, 5 yardsPre-snap flags | +0% CMU | CMU: Punt |
| 8 | Q1 2:20 | Block Below the Waist on Central Michigan, 5 yardsJudgment calls | +0% MIA | MIA: Touchdown |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Central Michigan 0% · Miami 100%
- Final margin
- Miami by 49
- Luck in points
- 4.6 for Miami
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Miami by 44.4
- Replay with same day's form
- Central Michigan 0% · Miami 100% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 4 2026 games ·
Central Michigan ·
Miami
More from Week 4 2026
- Wake Forest at Louisville WAKE 30–27 · replay 38% for the winner
- App State at NC State NCSU 41–31 · replay 53% for the winner
- Georgia Tech at Stanford STAN 34–27 · replay 59% for the winner
- Robert Morris at Buffalo BUF 31–28 · replay 63% for the winner
- South Florida at Bowling Green USF 14–6 · replay 68% for the winner
- UNLV at Akron UNLV 38–10 · replay 71% for the winner
- Clemson at California CLEM 24–10 · replay 73% for the winner
- Virginia Tech at Boston College VT 21–14 · replay 81% for the winner
- UConn at Miami (OH) M-OH 24–21 · replay 83% for the winner
- Ball State at Kent State KENT 26–13 · replay 90% for the winner
- Massachusetts at Sacramento State MASS 35–6 · replay 94% for the winner
- Boise State at Western Michigan BOIS 32–7 · replay 97% for the winner