Week 4 2026 · September 26, 2026
Wake Forest at Louisville, Week 4 2026: who deserved to win?
Wake Forest beat Louisville 30–27, but the replays lean toward Louisville: it takes 6 of 10 with the same day's form. Luck ran its way: kicks alone were worth 24 points of win probability to Wake Forest.
Before kickoff Louisville was a 77% favorite. The biggest swing (Q4, 2:29 left): C. Hilbert missed a 42-yard field goal, worth 22 points of win probability to Wake Forest.
Final
| 30 | |
| 27 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +62 Wake Forest very lucky · −62 Louisville
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Wake Forest wins 4, Louisville wins 6.
- 1 WAKE 37 LOU 14
- 2 WAKE 27 LOU 14
- 3 WAKE 21 LOU 14
- 4 WAKE 28 LOU 24
- 5 WAKE 21 LOU 23
- 6 WAKE 27 LOU 33
- 7 WAKE 14 LOU 23
- 8 WAKE 7 LOU 21
- 9 WAKE 17 LOU 35
- 10 WAKE 14 LOU 41
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Wake Forest wins 38% of them, Louisville 62%, counting the 3% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Wake Forest by 3.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Wake Forest by 17+ | 8.0% |
| Wake Forest by 9–16 | 11.2% |
| Wake Forest by 1–8 | 16.6% |
| Level after regulation | 3.3% |
| Louisville by 1–8 | 22.4% |
| Louisville by 9–16 | 17.3% |
| Louisville by 17+ | 21.3% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- C. Calvert, 39 yds made · 76% expected
- C. Hilbert, 41 yds made · 72% expected
- C. Calvert, 35 yds made · 82% expected
- C. Hilbert, 54 yds made · 48% expected
- C. Calvert, 32 yds made · 86% expected
- C. Hilbert, 42 yds missed · 71% expected
- N. Keller, 57 yds blocked · 43% expected
Penalties: Wake Forest 10 for 85 yards, Louisville 8 for 83 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q2 15:00 | False Start on Wake Forest, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% LOU +0.6 pts |
| Q2 15:00 | False Start on Wake Forest, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% LOU +0.4 pts |
| Q2 14:55 | Roughing the Passer on Louisville, 15 yards | +3% WAKE +2.1 pts |
| Q2 14:48 | False Start on Wake Forest, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% LOU +0.7 pts |
| Q2 7:27 | Holding on Wake Forest, 10 yards | +1% LOU +0.6 pts |
| Q2 4:34 | Holding on Louisville, 10 yards, wiping out the play | +5% WAKE +1.8 pts |
| Q2 4:02 | Personal Foul on Wake Forest, 15 yards | +4% LOU +1.6 pts |
| Q2 3:46 | False Start on Wake Forest, 5 yards · pre-snap | +2% LOU +0.8 pts |
| Q2 0:47 | Delay of Game on Louisville, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% WAKE +0.1 pts |
| Q2 0:42 | False Start on Wake Forest, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% LOU 0.0 pts |
| Q3 7:12 | Personal Foul on Louisville, 15 yards | +5% WAKE +1.6 pts |
| Q3 5:18 | Unsportsmanlike Conduct on Wake Forest, 15 yards | +3% LOU +0.9 pts |
| Q3 3:21 | Pass Interference on Wake Forest, 15 yards, wiping out the play | +15% LOU +4.1 pts |
| Q3 0:48 | Intentional Grounding on Louisville, 8 yards | +2% WAKE +0.5 pts |
| Q3 0:04 | False Start on Wake Forest, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% LOU +0.6 pts |
| Q4 14:52 | Unsportsmanlike Conduct on Louisville, 15 yards | +3% WAKE +0.9 pts |
| Q4 8:37 | Offside on Louisville, 5 yards · pre-snap | +13% WAKE +2.5 pts |
| Q4 0:47 | Holding on Louisville, 10 yards | +17% WAKE +1.5 pts |
When it happened
Louisville’s chance of winning
As low as 0% and as high as 83%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q3 3:21 | Pass Interference on Wake Forest, 15 yards, wiping out the playJudgment calls | +15% LOU | LOU: Field goal |
| 2 | Q4 8:37 | Offside on Louisville, 5 yardsPre-snap flags | +13% WAKE | WAKE: Field goal |
| 3 | Q4 6:56 | Wake Forest was stopped on 3rd & 13rd & 4th downs · 76% expected | +10% LOU | WAKE: Field goal |
| 4 | Q4 5:30 | Louisville converted 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 37% expected | +14% LOU | LOU: Missed field goal |
| 5 | Q4 2:29 | C. Hilbert missed a 42-yard field goalKicks · 71% expected for him | +22% WAKE | LOU: Missed field goal |
| 6 | Q4 0:55 | Louisville converted 3rd & 43rd & 4th downs · 46% expected | +15% LOU | LOU: Missed field goal |
| 7 | Q4 0:47 | Holding on Louisville, 10 yardsJudgment calls | +17% WAKE | WAKE: End of game |
| 8 | Q4 0:15 | N. Keller had a 57-yard field goal blockedKicks · 43% expected for him, 2 of 4 from 45+ before | +12% WAKE | – |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Wake Forest 89% · Louisville 11%
- Final margin
- Wake Forest by 3
- Luck in points
- 5.7 for Louisville
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Wake Forest by 8.7
- Replay with same day's form
- Wake Forest 38% · Louisville 62% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 4 2026 games ·
Wake Forest ·
Louisville
More from Week 4 2026
- App State at NC State NCSU 41–31 · replay 53% for the winner
- Georgia Tech at Stanford STAN 34–27 · replay 59% for the winner
- Clemson at California CLEM 24–10 · replay 73% for the winner
- Virginia Tech at Boston College VT 21–14 · replay 81% for the winner
- Missouri State at SMU SMU 34–24 · replay 99% for the winner
- Bucknell at Pittsburgh PITT 59–0 · replay 100% for the winner
- Central Arkansas at Florida State FSU 34–7 · replay 100% for the winner
- William & Mary at Duke DUKE 62–7 · replay 100% for the winner
- Delaware at Virginia UVA 42–3 · replay 100% for the winner
- Central Michigan at Miami MIA 52–3 · replay 100% for the winner
- Army at Temple ARMY 21–17 · replay 9% for the winner
- Iowa at Michigan IOWA 20–19 · replay 13% for the winner