Week 4 2026 · September 26, 2026
North Carolina Central at East Carolina, Week 4 2026: who deserved to win?
East Carolina beat North Carolina Central 42–9, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, East Carolina wins 10 of 10.
Before kickoff East Carolina was a 99% favorite.
Final
| 9 | |
| 42 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +2 East Carolina about even · −2 North Carolina Central
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. North Carolina Central wins 0, East Carolina wins 10.
- 1 NCCU 20 ECU 26
- 2 NCCU 28 ECU 41
- 3 NCCU 24 ECU 41
- 4 NCCU 38 ECU 59
- 5 NCCU 3 ECU 27
- 6 NCCU 13 ECU 42
- 7 NCCU 7 ECU 40
- 8 NCCU 14 ECU 50
- 9 NCCU 10 ECU 52
- 10 NCCU 7 ECU 59
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
North Carolina Central wins 2% of them, East Carolina 98%, counting the 1% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: East Carolina by 33.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| North Carolina Central by 17+ | 0.1% |
| North Carolina Central by 9–16 | 0.5% |
| North Carolina Central by 1–8 | 1.4% |
| Level after regulation | 0.6% |
| East Carolina by 1–8 | 5.3% |
| East Carolina by 9–16 | 8.8% |
| East Carolina by 17+ | 83.2% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- R. Daniels, 39 yds made · 74% expected
- Extra point missed · 98% expected
Penalties: North Carolina Central 8 for 62 yards, East Carolina 8 for 95 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q2 10:13 | False Start on North Carolina Central, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% ECU +0.5 pts |
| Q2 9:54 | False Start on North Carolina Central, 4 yards · pre-snap | 0% ECU +0.1 pts |
| Q2 9:34 | Personal Foul on North Carolina Central, 15 yards | 0% ECU +1.6 pts |
| Q2 7:39 | Holding on East Carolina, 10 yards | 0% NCCU +0.6 pts |
| Q2 7:08 | Face Mask on East Carolina, 15 yards | 0% NCCU +0.9 pts |
| Q2 6:07 | Personal Foul on East Carolina, 15 yards | 0% NCCU +1.6 pts |
| Q2 4:41 | Illegal Formation on North Carolina Central, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% ECU +0.7 pts |
| Q3 9:21 | False Start on East Carolina, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% NCCU +0.3 pts |
| Q3 8:44 | Unsportsmanlike Conduct on East Carolina, 15 yards | 0% NCCU +2.9 pts |
| Q3 5:43 | False Start on East Carolina, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% NCCU +3.1 pts |
| Q3 5:43 | Offside on North Carolina Central, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% ECU +0.3 pts |
| Q3 3:59 | Delay of Game on North Carolina Central, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% ECU +0.8 pts |
| Q4 13:36 | Personal Foul on East Carolina, 15 yards | 0% NCCU +1.6 pts |
| Q4 12:01 | Personal Foul on East Carolina, 15 yards | 0% NCCU +1.6 pts |
| Q4 7:15 | Pass Interference on North Carolina Central, 15 yards | 0% ECU +0.7 pts |
| Q4 5:41 | Holding on North Carolina Central, 8 yards | 0% ECU +1.6 pts |
When it happened
East Carolina’s chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 12:40 | North Carolina Central converted 3rd & 113rd & 4th downs · 23% expected | +0% NCCU | NCCU: Field goal |
| 2 | Q1 11:15 | North Carolina Central was stopped on 3rd & 113rd & 4th downs · 24% expected | +0% NCCU | NCCU: Field goal |
| 3 | Q1 10:47 | R. Daniels made a 39-yard field goalKicks · 74% expected for him | +0% ECU | NCCU: Punt |
| 4 | Q1 8:40 | East Carolina converted 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 26% expected | +0% ECU | ECU: Turnover |
| 5 | Q1 7:50 | East Carolina fumbled and North Carolina Central recoveredFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +0% NCCU | ECU: Touchdown |
| 6 | Q1 6:22 | North Carolina Central was stopped on 3rd & 113rd & 4th downs · 24% expected | +0% ECU | NCCU: Punt |
| 7 | Q4 5:41 | North Carolina Central converted 3rd & 13rd & 4th downs · 74% expectedNorth Carolina Central converted 3rd & 173rd & 4th downs · 16% expectedHolding on North Carolina Central, 8 yardsJudgment calls | +0% ECU | NCCU: End of game |
| 8 | Q4 0:31 | North Carolina Central converted 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 25% expectedNorth Carolina Central missed an extra pointKicks · extra points are made about 98% of the time | +2% ECU | NCCU: End of game |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
North Carolina Central 0% · East Carolina 100%
- Final margin
- East Carolina by 33
- Luck in points
- 1.8 for East Carolina
- Luck-adjusted margin
- East Carolina by 31.2
- Replay with same day's form
- North Carolina Central 2% · East Carolina 98% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 4 2026 games ·
North Carolina Central ·
East Carolina
More from Week 4 2026
- Army at Temple ARMY 21–17 · replay 9% for the winner
- Navy at UAB UAB 24–20 · replay 32% for the winner
- Southern Miss at Tulane TULN 24–21 · replay 55% for the winner
- Rice at Fresno State FRES 38–24 · replay 59% for the winner
- South Florida at Bowling Green USF 14–6 · replay 68% for the winner
- Florida Atlantic at UL Monroe FAU 45–17 · replay 70% for the winner
- Louisiana at Charlotte UL 34–7 · replay 90% for the winner
- Colorado State at UTSA UTSA 59–45 · replay 96% for the winner
- Tulsa at Arkansas ARK 34–6 · replay 99% for the winner
- Houston Christian at North Texas UNT 63–14 · replay 100% for the winner
- Howard at Rutgers RUTG 58–7 · replay 100% for the winner
- Iowa at Michigan IOWA 20–19 · replay 13% for the winner