Week 4 2026 · September 26, 2026
Colorado State at UTSA, Week 4 2026: who deserved to win?
UTSA beat Colorado State 59–45, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, UTSA wins 10 of 10.
Before kickoff UTSA was an 83% favorite.
Final
| 45 | |
| 59 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +4 UTSA about even · −4 Colorado State
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Colorado State wins 0, UTSA wins 10.
- 1 CSU 27 UTSA 31
- 2 CSU 31 UTSA 41
- 3 CSU 24 UTSA 38
- 4 CSU 24 UTSA 42
- 5 CSU 24 UTSA 47
- 6 CSU 16 UTSA 42
- 7 CSU 7 UTSA 38
- 8 CSU 17 UTSA 53
- 9 CSU 10 UTSA 51
- 10 CSU 17 UTSA 70
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Colorado State wins 4% of them, UTSA 96%. The line is what actually happened: UTSA by 14.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Colorado State by 17+ | 0.4% |
| Colorado State by 9–16 | 1.1% |
| Colorado State by 1–8 | 2.3% |
| Level after regulation | 0.3% |
| UTSA by 1–8 | 6.5% |
| UTSA by 9–16 | 10.1% |
| UTSA by 17+ | 79.4% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- M. Petro, 44 yds missed · 66% expected
- M. Petro, 46 yds made · 61% expected
- K. Nguma, 51 yds made · 53% expected
Penalties: Colorado State 10 for 56 yards, UTSA 3 for 45 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 7:06 | Illegal Formation on Colorado State, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% UTSA +0.3 pts |
| Q1 5:08 | False Start on Colorado State, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% UTSA +0.8 pts |
| Q1 5:08 | False Start on Colorado State, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% UTSA +0.4 pts |
| Q1 5:08 | False Start on Colorado State, 5 yards · pre-snap | +4% CSU +0.4 pts |
| Q2 11:42 | Pass Interference on Colorado State, 6 yards | 0% CSU +0.5 pts |
| Q2 11:42 | Offside on Colorado State, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% UTSA +2.1 pts |
| Q2 6:48 | Illegal Shift on Colorado State, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% CSU +0.2 pts |
| Q3 15:00 | Face Mask on UTSA, 15 yards | 0% UTSA +0.3 pts |
| Q3 11:27 | False Start on Colorado State, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% UTSA +1.3 pts |
| Q4 14:08 | Holding on Colorado State, 10 yards | +4% UTSA +3.0 pts |
| Q4 8:55 | Unnecessary Roughness on UTSA, 15 yards | +1% CSU +0.9 pts |
| Q4 1:53 | Unsportsmanlike Conduct on UTSA, 15 yards | 0% CSU +1.6 pts |
| Q4 1:53 | False Start on Colorado State, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% UTSA +0.7 pts |
When it happened
UTSA’s chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 14:42 | UTSA was stopped on 3rd & 93rd & 4th downs · 33% expected | +4% CSU | UTSA: Missed field goal |
| 2 | Q1 13:25 | M. Petro missed a 44-yard field goalKicks · 66% expected for him | +3% CSU | UTSA: Touchdown |
| 3 | Q1 10:52 | UTSA converted 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 31% expected | +5% UTSA | UTSA: Touchdown |
| 4 | Q1 9:03 | Colorado State was stopped on 3rd & 143rd & 4th downs · 21% expectedColorado State fumbled and recovered itFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +6% CSU | CSU: Punt |
| 5 | Q1 5:12 | UTSA converted 3rd & 43rd & 4th downs · 52% expected | +3% UTSA | UTSA: Touchdown |
| 6 | Q3 11:27 | Colorado State converted 3rd & 13rd & 4th downs · 76% expectedColorado State converted 3rd & 23rd & 4th downs · 63% expectedColorado State was stopped on 3rd & 83rd & 4th downs · 32% expectedColorado State converted 4th & 83rd & 4th downs · 31% expectedFalse Start on Colorado State, 5 yardsPre-snap flags | +3% CSU | CSU: Touchdown |
| 7 | Q3 4:06 | Colorado State converted 3rd & 33rd & 4th downs · 46% expected | +3% CSU | CSU: Touchdown |
| 8 | Q4 11:19 | Colorado State was stopped on 3rd & 153rd & 4th downs · 20% expectedColorado State converted 4th & 63rd & 4th downs · 38% expected | +3% CSU | CSU: Touchdown |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Colorado State 4% · UTSA 96%
- Final margin
- UTSA by 14
- Luck in points
- 0.9 for UTSA
- Luck-adjusted margin
- UTSA by 13.1
- Replay with same day's form
- Colorado State 4% · UTSA 96% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 4 2026 games ·
Colorado State ·
UTSA
More from Week 4 2026
- Army at Temple ARMY 21–17 · replay 9% for the winner
- Navy at UAB UAB 24–20 · replay 32% for the winner
- Southern Miss at Tulane TULN 24–21 · replay 55% for the winner
- Rice at Fresno State FRES 38–24 · replay 59% for the winner
- South Florida at Bowling Green USF 14–6 · replay 68% for the winner
- Florida Atlantic at UL Monroe FAU 45–17 · replay 70% for the winner
- Arizona at Washington State ARIZ 34–24 · replay 73% for the winner
- Troy at Utah State USU 21–10 · replay 75% for the winner
- Louisiana at Charlotte UL 34–7 · replay 90% for the winner
- Boise State at Western Michigan BOIS 32–7 · replay 97% for the winner
- North Carolina Central at East Carolina ECU 42–9 · replay 98% for the winner
- San Diego State at Toledo TOL 41–16 · replay 99% for the winner