Week 3 2025 · September 13, 2025
USC at Purdue, Week 3 2025: who deserved to win?
USC beat Purdue 33–17, and the replays lean its way: with the same day's form, it wins 7 of 10.
Before kickoff USC was a 91% favorite.
Final
| 33 | |
| 17 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +26 USC lucky · −26 Purdue
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. USC wins 7, Purdue wins 3.
- 1 USC 45 PUR 14
- 2 USC 26 PUR 3
- 3 USC 49 PUR 31
- 4 USC 31 PUR 17
- 5 USC 20 PUR 10
- 6 USC 27 PUR 21
- 7 USC 17 PUR 14
- 8 USC 21 PUR 24
- 9 USC 17 PUR 23
- 10 USC 21 PUR 35
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
USC wins 74% of them, Purdue 26%, counting the 5% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: USC by 16.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| USC by 17+ | 30.3% |
| USC by 9–16 | 19.8% |
| USC by 1–8 | 21.1% |
| Level after regulation | 4.8% |
| Purdue by 1–8 | 13.9% |
| Purdue by 9–16 | 6.3% |
| Purdue by 17+ | 3.9% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- R. Sayeri, 24 yds made · 92% expected
- S. Porath, 39 yds made · 72% expected
- R. Sayeri, 37 yds made · 78% expected
- R. Sayeri, 48 yds made · 58% expected
- R. Sayeri, 37 yds missed · 79% expected
- R. Sayeri, 19 yds made · 95% expected
Penalties: USC 8 for 90 yards, Purdue 5 for 60 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 10:44 | Sideline Interference on USC, 15 yards | +1% PUR +1.6 pts |
| Q1 10:16 | Pass Interference on Purdue, 15 yards | 0% USC +0.8 pts |
| Q1 0:56 | Holding on USC, 10 yards | 0% PUR +0.1 pts |
| Q2 12:59 | Personal Foul on USC, 15 yards | +2% PUR +3.8 pts |
| Q2 11:35 | Personal Foul on USC, 15 yards | +1% PUR +0.7 pts |
| Q2 5:44 | False Start on USC, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% PUR +0.6 pts |
| Q2 2:49 | Holding on Purdue, 10 yards | 0% USC +1.3 pts |
| Q2 2:31 | Holding on USC, 10 yards | 0% PUR +1.0 pts |
| Q3 14:18 | Pass Interference on Purdue, 15 yards | 0% USC +1.6 pts |
| Q3 2:15 | Sideline Interference on USC, 15 yards | +3% PUR +6.8 pts |
| Q4 6:07 | Offside on USC, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% PUR +1.3 pts |
| Q4 4:03 | Personal Foul on Purdue, 15 yards | 0% USC +1.6 pts |
| Q4 0:50 | False Start on Purdue, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% USC +0.1 pts |
When it happened
Purdue’s chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 13:41 | Purdue converted 4th & 13rd & 4th downs · 69% expected | +2% PUR | PUR: Punt |
| 2 | Q1 10:44 | Sideline Interference on USC, 15 yardsJudgment calls | +1% PUR | PUR: Turnover |
| 3 | Q1 8:10 | USC converted 3rd & 33rd & 4th downs · 50% expected | +1% PUR | USC: Field goal |
| 4 | Q1 2:34 | USC converted 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 32% expected | +2% USC | USC: Touchdown |
| 5 | Q2 12:59 | Personal Foul on USC, 15 yardsJudgment calls | +2% PUR | PUR: Field goal |
| 6 | Q2 11:54 | Purdue converted 3rd & 43rd & 4th downs · 39% expected | +1% PUR | PUR: Field goal |
| 7 | Q2 8:20 | USC converted 4th & 43rd & 4th downs · 51% expected | +2% USC | USC: Touchdown |
| 8 | Q3 3:22 | Purdue converted 3rd & 43rd & 4th downs · 39% expected | +1% PUR | PUR: End of half |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
USC 100% · Purdue 0%
- Final margin
- USC by 16
- Luck in points
- 7.3 for Purdue
- Luck-adjusted margin
- USC by 23.3
- Replay with same day's form
- USC 74% · Purdue 26% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 3 2025 games ·
USC ·
Purdue
More from Week 3 2025
- Minnesota at California CAL 27–14 · replay 72% for the winner
- New Mexico at UCLA UNM 35–10 · replay 85% for the winner
- Wisconsin at Alabama ALA 38–14 · replay 96% for the winner
- Youngstown State at Michigan State MSU 41–24 · replay 96% for the winner
- Norfolk State at Rutgers RUTG 60–10 · replay 98% for the winner
- Oregon at Northwestern ORE 34–14 · replay 98% for the winner
- Massachusetts at Iowa IOWA 47–7 · replay 99% for the winner
- Western Michigan at Illinois ILL 38–0 · replay 99% for the winner
- Towson at Maryland MD 44–17 · replay 100% for the winner
- Villanova at Penn State PSU 52–6 · replay 100% for the winner
- Indiana State at Indiana IU 73–0 · replay 100% for the winner
- Houston Christian at Nebraska NEB 59–7 · replay 100% for the winner