Week 4 2025 · September 20, 2025
Part of this game's play-by-play is missing from the source: the plays on file account for 51 of the 79 points, so the replay rests on the plays there are.
UNLV at Miami (OH), Week 4 2025: who deserved to win?
UNLV beat Miami (OH) 41–38, but the replays call it close to a coin flip: with the way both teams played, UNLV wins 5 of 10. Luck ran its way: 3rd & 4th downs alone were worth 36 points of win probability to UNLV.
Before kickoff UNLV was a 56% favorite. The game turned on a luck play (Q4, 6:13 left): UNLV converted 3rd & 8, worth 45 points of win probability to UNLV.
Final
| 41 | |
| 38 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +50 UNLV lucky · −50 Miami (OH)
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. UNLV wins 5, Miami (OH) wins 5.
- 1 UNLV 42 M-OH 17
- 2 UNLV 37 M-OH 21
- 3 UNLV 20 M-OH 10
- 4 UNLV 30 M-OH 24
- 5 UNLV 31 M-OH 28
- 6 UNLV 21 M-OH 24
- 7 UNLV 28 M-OH 34
- 8 UNLV 24 M-OH 35
- 9 UNLV 14 M-OH 31
- 10 UNLV 3 M-OH 28
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
UNLV wins 50% of them, Miami (OH) 50%, counting the 2% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: UNLV by 3.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| UNLV by 17+ | 13.3% |
| UNLV by 9–16 | 17.0% |
| UNLV by 1–8 | 19.7% |
| Level after regulation | 2.1% |
| Miami (OH) by 1–8 | 24.0% |
| Miami (OH) by 9–16 | 12.4% |
| Miami (OH) by 17+ | 11.4% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- R. Villela, 27 yds made · 88% expected
- D. Dzioban, 40 yds made · 76% expected
- R. Villela, 23 yds made · 91% expected
Penalties: UNLV 6 for 35 yards, Miami (OH) 7 for 79 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 14:56 | Offside on UNLV, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% M-OH +1.1 pts |
| Q1 14:37 | Unsportsmanlike Conduct on Miami (OH), 15 yards | +3% UNLV +1.6 pts |
| Q1 12:54 | False Start on Miami (OH), 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% UNLV +0.7 pts |
| Q1 12:54 | Offside on UNLV, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% M-OH +0.7 pts |
| Q1 12:54 | False Start on Miami (OH), 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% UNLV +0.7 pts |
| Q1 7:26 | Offside on UNLV, 5 yards · pre-snap | +2% M-OH +1.0 pts |
| Q1 2:09 | Personal Foul on Miami (OH), 15 yards | +3% UNLV +1.6 pts |
| Q2 14:13 | Holding on Miami (OH), 10 yards | +2% UNLV +1.0 pts |
| Q2 14:13 | Offside on UNLV, 5 yards · pre-snap | +2% M-OH +1.0 pts |
| Q2 3:47 | Personal Foul on Miami (OH), 15 yards | +4% UNLV +1.6 pts |
| Q2 2:51 | Holding on UNLV, 10 yards | +2% M-OH +0.9 pts |
| Q2 1:15 | Offside on UNLV, 5 yards · pre-snap | +3% M-OH +1.3 pts |
| Q3 15:00 | Pass Interference on Miami (OH), 14 yards | +5% UNLV +2.5 pts |
When it happened
Miami (OH)’s chance of winning
As low as 0% and as high as 83%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 11:49 | UNLV converted 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 37% expected | +4% UNLV | UNLV: Turnover |
| 2 | Q2 10:41 | Return touchdown by UNLVSpecial teams | +15% UNLV | UNLV: Turnover on downs |
| 3 | Q2 8:10 | Miami (OH) converted 3rd & 93rd & 4th downs · 27% expected | +6% M-OH | M-OH: Field goal |
| 4 | Q3 15:00 | Pass Interference on Miami (OH), 14 yardsJudgment calls | +5% UNLV | UNLV: Touchdown |
| 5 | Q4 10:52 | UNLV converted 3rd & 113rd & 4th downs · 26% expected | +13% UNLV | UNLV: Touchdown |
| 6 | Q4 6:13 | The game turned hereUNLV converted 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 42% expectedUNLV converted 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 38% expectedUNLV converted 3rd & 83rd & 4th downs · 33% expectedUNLV converted 3rd & 83rd & 4th downs · 33% expected | +45% UNLV | UNLV: End of game |
| 7 | Q4 2:32 | Miami (OH) fumbled and UNLV recoveredFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +14% UNLV | M-OH: Turnover |
| 8 | Q4 2:00 | UNLV converted 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 39% expected | +14% UNLV | UNLV: Field goal |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
UNLV 34% · Miami (OH) 66%
- Final margin
- UNLV by 3
- Luck in points
- 5.4 for UNLV
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Miami (OH) by 2.4
- Replay with same day's form
- UNLV 50% · Miami (OH) 50% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here. Part of this game's play-by-play is missing from the source: the plays on file account for 51 of the 79 points, so the replay rests on the plays there are.
Methodology and validation · All Week 4 2025 games ·
UNLV ·
Miami (OH)
More from Week 4 2025
- Fresno State at Hawai'i FRES 23–21 · replay 24% for the winner
- Troy at Buffalo TROY 21–17 · replay 30% for the winner
- Ball State at UConn CONN 31–25 · replay 37% for the winner
- UTSA at Colorado State UTSA 17–16 · replay 40% for the winner
- Louisiana at Eastern Michigan EMU 34–31 · replay 42% for the winner
- Toledo at Western Michigan WMU 14–13 · replay 71% for the winner
- Nevada at Western Kentucky WKU 31–16 · replay 73% for the winner
- Boise State at Air Force BOIS 49–37 · replay 75% for the winner
- Northern Illinois at Mississippi State MSST 38–10 · replay 88% for the winner
- Wyoming at Colorado COLO 37–20 · replay 91% for the winner
- Idaho at San José State SJSU 31–28 · replay 91% for the winner
- California at San Diego State SDSU 34–0 · replay 92% for the winner