Week 1 2026 · September 4, 2026
Indiana State at Purdue, Week 1 2026: who deserved to win?
Purdue beat Indiana State 44–19, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, Purdue wins 10 of 10.
Before kickoff Purdue was a 99% favorite.
Final
| 19 | |
| 44 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +1 Purdue about even · −1 Indiana State
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Indiana State wins 0, Purdue wins 10.
- 1 INST 24 PUR 31
- 2 INST 24 PUR 38
- 3 INST 28 PUR 45
- 4 INST 24 PUR 45
- 5 INST 3 PUR 27
- 6 INST 6 PUR 34
- 7 INST 14 PUR 45
- 8 INST 7 PUR 41
- 9 INST 0 PUR 38
- 10 INST 3 PUR 49
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Indiana State wins 1% of them, Purdue 99%. The line is what actually happened: Purdue by 25.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Indiana State by 17+ | 0.1% |
| Indiana State by 9–16 | 0.1% |
| Indiana State by 1–8 | 0.9% |
| Level after regulation | 0.2% |
| Purdue by 1–8 | 4.1% |
| Purdue by 9–16 | 10.3% |
| Purdue by 17+ | 84.4% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
No play in this game swung win probability by luck.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- J. Echeverria Lozano, 39 yds made · 74% expected
- S. Lopez, 28 yds made · 87% expected
- J. Echeverria Lozano, 25 yds made · 91% expected
- S. Lopez, 47 yds made · 58% expected
- J. Echeverria Lozano, 23 yds made · 93% expected
- Extra point missed · 98% expected
Penalties: Indiana State 7 for 67 yards, Purdue 8 for 75 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 12:56 | Personal Foul on Indiana State, 15 yards | 0% PUR +1.6 pts |
| Q1 1:43 | Holding on Indiana State, 7 yards | 0% PUR +1.8 pts |
| Q2 14:03 | Illegal Block on Purdue, 10 yards | 0% INST +0.6 pts |
| Q2 13:19 | Holding on Purdue, 10 yards | 0% INST +0.6 pts |
| Q2 12:35 | Roughing the Passer on Indiana State, 15 yards | 0% PUR +1.6 pts |
| Q2 12:26 | False Start on Purdue, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% INST +0.7 pts |
| Q2 9:25 | False Start on Purdue, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% INST +1.3 pts |
| Q2 8:12 | False Start on Indiana State, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% PUR +0.6 pts |
| Q2 6:47 | Holding on Indiana State, 10 yards | 0% PUR +1.3 pts |
| Q2 5:01 | Holding on Purdue, 10 yards | 0% INST +0.6 pts |
| Q2 3:07 | Illegal Formation on Purdue, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% INST +0.3 pts |
| Q3 7:17 | Pass Interference on Purdue, 15 yards | 0% PUR +0.7 pts |
| Q3 5:12 | Ineligible Downfield on Indiana State, 5 yards | 0% PUR +1.4 pts |
| Q4 14:04 | Unsportsmanlike Conduct on Purdue, 15 yards | 0% INST +1.6 pts |
| Q4 13:49 | Holding on Indiana State, 10 yards, wiping out the play | 0% PUR +2.4 pts |
When it happened
Purdue’s chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 11:06 | J. Echeverria Lozano made a 39-yard field goalKicks · 74% expected for him | +0% PUR | PUR: Touchdown |
| 2 | Q1 8:50 | Indiana State converted 3rd & 113rd & 4th downs · 27% expected | +0% INST | INST: Field goal |
| 3 | Q1 4:28 | Purdue converted 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 42% expected | +0% PUR | PUR: Touchdown |
| 4 | Q1 0:04 | Purdue converted 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 35% expected | +0% PUR | PUR: Field goal |
| 5 | Q2 7:07 | Indiana State converted 3rd & 93rd & 4th downs · 31% expected | +0% INST | INST: Field goal |
| 6 | Q2 3:35 | Purdue was stopped on 3rd & 113rd & 4th downs · 30% expected | +0% INST | PUR: Punt |
| 7 | Q4 13:49 | Holding on Indiana State, 10 yards, wiping out the playJudgment calls | +0% PUR | PUR: Turnover on downs |
| 8 | Q4 12:44 | Indiana State missed an extra pointKicks · extra points are made about 98% of the time | +0% PUR | INST: Touchdown |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Indiana State 0% · Purdue 100%
- Final margin
- Purdue by 25
- Luck in points
- 6.4 for Indiana State
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Purdue by 31.4
- Replay with same day's form
- Indiana State 1% · Purdue 99% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 1 2026 games ·
Indiana State ·
Purdue
More from Week 1 2026
- Toledo at Michigan State MSU 30–20 · replay 49% for the winner
- Massachusetts at Rutgers MASS 37–21 · replay 74% for the winner
- Wisconsin vs Notre Dame ND 41–13 · replay 79% for the winner
- Western Michigan at Michigan MICH 13–12 · replay 86% for the winner
- Washington State at Washington WASH 24–10 · replay 89% for the winner
- Boise State at Oregon ORE 34–27 · replay 91% for the winner
- North Texas at Indiana IU 52–16 · replay 92% for the winner
- Ohio at Nebraska NEB 49–21 · replay 93% for the winner
- UAB at Illinois ILL 42–23 · replay 95% for the winner
- Murray State at Middle Tennessee MTSU 38–14 · replay 95% for the winner
- UCLA at California UCLA 45–24 · replay 96% for the winner
- South Dakota State at Northwestern NU 34–18 · replay 97% for the winner