Week 2 2026 · September 12, 2026
Georgia Southern at Clemson, Week 2 2026: who deserved to win?
Clemson beat Georgia Southern 22–7, and the replays lean its way: with the same day's form, it wins 6 of 10.
Before kickoff Clemson was a 91% favorite.
Final
| 7 | |
| 22 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +36 Clemson lucky · −36 Georgia Southern
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Georgia Southern wins 4, Clemson wins 6.
- 1 GASO 30 CLEM 7
- 2 GASO 37 CLEM 24
- 3 GASO 24 CLEM 16
- 4 GASO 16 CLEM 13
- 5 GASO 13 CLEM 15
- 6 GASO 17 CLEM 23
- 7 GASO 0 CLEM 10
- 8 GASO 19 CLEM 31
- 9 GASO 3 CLEM 20
- 10 GASO 6 CLEM 31
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Georgia Southern wins 36% of them, Clemson 64%, counting the 3% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Clemson by 15.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Georgia Southern by 17+ | 6.5% |
| Georgia Southern by 9–16 | 10.8% |
| Georgia Southern by 1–8 | 16.2% |
| Level after regulation | 3.5% |
| Clemson by 1–8 | 21.9% |
| Clemson by 9–16 | 19.8% |
| Clemson by 17+ | 21.4% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- N. Hauser, 20 yds made · 94% expected
- N. Hauser, 34 yds made · 82% expected
- N. Hauser, 38 yds made · 76% expected
- T. Bryant, 53 yds missed · 49% expected
- N. Hauser, 50 yds made · 55% expected
- N. Hauser, 49 yds made · 57% expected
Penalties: Georgia Southern 8 for 77 yards, Clemson 9 for 85 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 11:48 | Pass Interference on Georgia Southern, 4 yards | +1% CLEM +1.0 pts |
| Q1 11:44 | False Start on Clemson, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% GASO +0.7 pts |
| Q1 8:36 | False Start on Georgia Southern, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% CLEM +1.9 pts |
| Q1 7:03 | Unnecessary Roughness on Georgia Southern, 15 yards | +1% CLEM +1.6 pts |
| Q1 2:43 | Face Mask on Georgia Southern, 15 yards | +1% CLEM +1.6 pts |
| Q2 13:04 | Holding on Clemson, 10 yards | +1% GASO +2.1 pts |
| Q2 10:51 | Pass Interference on Georgia Southern, 10 yards | 0% CLEM +0.9 pts |
| Q2 9:43 | Holding on Clemson, 10 yards | 0% GASO +0.6 pts |
| Q2 1:33 | Holding on Clemson, 10 yards | +1% GASO +0.9 pts |
| Q2 1:28 | False Start on Clemson, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% GASO +0.4 pts |
| Q2 0:47 | Holding on Clemson, 10 yards | 0% GASO +0.4 pts |
| Q3 9:03 | Roughing the Passer on Clemson, 15 yards | +1% GASO +1.1 pts |
| Q3 8:14 | False Start on Georgia Southern, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% CLEM +1.5 pts |
| Q3 5:55 | Pass Interference on Georgia Southern, 13 yards | 0% CLEM +0.8 pts |
| Q4 11:19 | Pass Interference on Clemson, 15 yards | +2% GASO +1.0 pts |
| Q4 6:43 | Delay of Game on Clemson, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% GASO +1.0 pts |
| Q4 5:54 | Holding on Georgia Southern, 10 yards, wiping out the play | +1% CLEM +2.4 pts |
When it happened
Clemson’s chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 14:06 | Clemson was stopped on 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 38% expected | +1% GASO | CLEM: Touchdown |
| 2 | Q2 0:22 | Clemson converted 3rd & 183rd & 4th downs · 17% expected | +1% CLEM | CLEM: Field goal |
| 3 | Q3 13:23 | Clemson converted 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 27% expected | +1% CLEM | CLEM: Punt |
| 4 | Q3 9:19 | Georgia Southern converted 3rd & 33rd & 4th downs · 53% expected | +1% GASO | GASO: Punt |
| 5 | Q3 9:03 | Roughing the Passer on Clemson, 15 yardsJudgment calls | +1% GASO | GASO: Punt |
| 6 | Q4 12:03 | Clemson was stopped on 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 27% expected | +1% GASO | CLEM: Punt |
| 7 | Q4 11:19 | Pass Interference on Clemson, 15 yardsJudgment calls | +2% GASO | GASO: Missed field goal |
| 8 | Q4 10:25 | Georgia Southern was stopped on 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 26% expected | +1% CLEM | GASO: Missed field goal |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Georgia Southern 29% · Clemson 71%
- Final margin
- Clemson by 15
- Luck in points
- 10.7 for Clemson
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Clemson by 4.3
- Replay with same day's form
- Georgia Southern 36% · Clemson 64% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 2 2026 games ·
Georgia Southern ·
Clemson
More from Week 2 2026
- California at Syracuse CAL 21–18 · replay 19% for the winner
- Duke at Illinois DUKE 31–27 · replay 25% for the winner
- Tennessee at Georgia Tech TENN 45–24 · replay 33% for the winner
- App State at East Carolina APP 27–24 · replay 36% for the winner
- Middle Tennessee at Marshall MRSH 28–26 · replay 43% for the winner
- Rutgers at Boston College BC 28–21 · replay 45% for the winner
- South Alabama at Tulane TULN 28–24 · replay 56% for the winner
- UCF at Pittsburgh PITT 12–7 · replay 58% for the winner
- Georgia State at Kennesaw State GAST 31–17 · replay 62% for the winner
- Wake Forest at Purdue WAKE 38–36 · replay 65% for the winner
- UL Monroe at UAB UAB 26–20 · replay 81% for the winner
- Alabama State at Troy TROY 34–17 · replay 95% for the winner