Week 2 2026 · September 12, 2026
Part of this game's play-by-play is missing from the source: the plays on file account for 57 of the 65 points, so the replay rests on the plays there are.
Old Dominion at Virginia Tech, Week 2 2026: who deserved to win?
Virginia Tech beat Old Dominion 44–21, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, Virginia Tech wins 10 of 10.
Before kickoff Virginia Tech was an 87% favorite.
Final
| 21 | |
| 44 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +4 Virginia Tech about even · −4 Old Dominion
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Old Dominion wins 0, Virginia Tech wins 10.
- 1 ODU 14 VT 18
- 2 ODU 21 VT 29
- 3 ODU 7 VT 19
- 4 ODU 11 VT 26
- 5 ODU 0 VT 18
- 6 ODU 3 VT 25
- 7 ODU 0 VT 24
- 8 ODU 14 VT 43
- 9 ODU 5 VT 39
- 10 ODU 7 VT 49
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Old Dominion wins 4% of them, Virginia Tech 96%, counting the 1% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Virginia Tech by 23.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Old Dominion by 17+ | 0.3% |
| Old Dominion by 9–16 | 0.7% |
| Old Dominion by 1–8 | 2.5% |
| Level after regulation | 0.5% |
| Virginia Tech by 1–8 | 8.6% |
| Virginia Tech by 9–16 | 14.8% |
| Virginia Tech by 17+ | 72.7% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- J. Love, 39 yds made · 77% expected
- N. Eichner, 34 yds made · 80% expected
- J. Love, 22 yds made · 96% expected
- N. Eichner, 51 yds made · 51% expected
- J. Love, 25 yds made · 94% expected
Penalties: Old Dominion 6 for 45 yards, Virginia Tech 6 for 31 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q2 13:03 | Illegal Block on Virginia Tech, 10 yards | 0% ODU +1.3 pts |
| Q2 12:47 | Intentional Grounding on Virginia Tech, 0 yards | 0% ODU 0.0 pts |
| Q2 4:56 | Illegal Formation on Virginia Tech, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% ODU +0.3 pts |
| Q2 3:10 | Delay of Game on Old Dominion, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% VT +0.4 pts |
| Q2 2:33 | Illegal Snap on Old Dominion, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% VT +0.3 pts |
| Q2 1:54 | Holding on Old Dominion, 10 yards | 0% VT +1.3 pts |
| Q3 0:20 | Holding on Old Dominion, 10 yards | 0% VT +0.2 pts |
| Q4 13:07 | Face Mask on Old Dominion, 13 yards | 0% VT +1.5 pts |
| Q4 11:12 | Unsportsmanlike Conduct on Old Dominion, 2 yards | 0% VT +2.1 pts |
| Q4 7:49 | Pass Interference on Virginia Tech, 1 yard, wiping out the play | +3% VT +8.6 pts |
| Q4 5:52 | Holding on Virginia Tech, 10 yards | 0% ODU +1.3 pts |
| Q4 4:41 | False Start on Virginia Tech, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% ODU +0.6 pts |
When it happened
Virginia Tech’s chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 10:23 | J. Love made a 39-yard field goalKicks · 77% expected for him | +2% VT | VT: Touchdown |
| 2 | Q1 9:19 | Old Dominion was stopped on 3rd & 13rd & 4th downs · 73% expected | +1% VT | ODU: Punt |
| 3 | Q1 7:21 | Virginia Tech converted 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 37% expected | +2% VT | VT: Touchdown |
| 4 | Q1 6:08 | Virginia Tech converted 3rd & 33rd & 4th downs · 50% expected | +1% VT | VT: Touchdown |
| 5 | Q1 3:59 | Virginia Tech converted 4th & 13rd & 4th downs · 72% expected | +1% VT | VT: Touchdown |
| 6 | Q1 2:44 | Old Dominion fumbled and recovered itFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +1% ODU | ODU: Field goal |
| 7 | Q1 2:29 | Old Dominion fumbled and Virginia Tech recoveredFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50Return touchdown by Virginia TechSpecial teams | +4% VT | ODU: Field goal |
| 8 | Q4 7:49 | Pass Interference on Virginia Tech, 1 yard, wiping out the playJudgment calls | +3% VT | ODU: Punt |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Old Dominion 0% · Virginia Tech 100%
- Final margin
- Virginia Tech by 23
- Luck in points
- none
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Virginia Tech by 23.0
- Replay with same day's form
- Old Dominion 4% · Virginia Tech 96% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here. Part of this game's play-by-play is missing from the source: the plays on file account for 57 of the 65 points, so the replay rests on the plays there are.
Methodology and validation · All Week 2 2026 games ·
Old Dominion ·
Virginia Tech
More from Week 2 2026
- California at Syracuse CAL 21–18 · replay 19% for the winner
- Duke at Illinois DUKE 31–27 · replay 25% for the winner
- Tennessee at Georgia Tech TENN 45–24 · replay 33% for the winner
- App State at East Carolina APP 27–24 · replay 36% for the winner
- Middle Tennessee at Marshall MRSH 28–26 · replay 43% for the winner
- Rutgers at Boston College BC 28–21 · replay 45% for the winner
- South Alabama at Tulane TULN 28–24 · replay 56% for the winner
- UCF at Pittsburgh PITT 12–7 · replay 58% for the winner
- Georgia State at Kennesaw State GAST 31–17 · replay 62% for the winner
- Georgia Southern at Clemson CLEM 22–7 · replay 64% for the winner
- Wake Forest at Purdue WAKE 38–36 · replay 65% for the winner
- UL Monroe at UAB UAB 26–20 · replay 81% for the winner