Week 3 2026 · September 19, 2026
UT Martin at Memphis, Week 3 2026: who deserved to win?
Memphis beat UT Martin 45–21, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, Memphis wins 10 of 10.
Before kickoff Memphis was a 99% favorite.
Final
| 21 | |
| 45 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index 0 Memphis about even · 0 UT Martin
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. UT Martin wins 0, Memphis wins 10.
- 1 UTM 21 MEM 34
- 2 UTM 24 MEM 45
- 3 UTM 10 MEM 35
- 4 UTM 0 MEM 30
- 5 UTM 16 MEM 49
- 6 UTM 3 MEM 38
- 7 UTM 17 MEM 56
- 8 UTM 0 MEM 44
- 9 UTM 0 MEM 48
- 10 UTM 0 MEM 56
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
UT Martin wins 0% of them, Memphis 100%. The line is what actually happened: Memphis by 24.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| UT Martin by 17+ | 0.0% |
| UT Martin by 9–16 | 0.1% |
| UT Martin by 1–8 | 0.2% |
| Level after regulation | 0.1% |
| Memphis by 1–8 | 1.5% |
| Memphis by 9–16 | 2.6% |
| Memphis by 17+ | 95.7% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
Penalties: UT Martin 8 for 50 yards, Memphis 3 for 15 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 11:43 | Face Mask on UT Martin, 15 yards | 0% MEM +0.9 pts |
| Q1 2:37 | False Start on UT Martin, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% MEM +1.0 pts |
| Q1 1:18 | Illegal Formation on UT Martin, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% MEM +0.3 pts |
| Q2 10:07 | False Start on UT Martin, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% MEM +0.9 pts |
| Q2 4:44 | False Start on UT Martin, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% MEM +0.8 pts |
| Q2 3:44 | False Start on Memphis, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% UTM +0.7 pts |
| Q3 12:25 | Illegal Substitution on UT Martin, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% MEM +1.0 pts |
| Q3 8:15 | Offside on Memphis, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% UTM +2.4 pts |
| Q3 4:09 | False Start on Memphis, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% UTM +0.1 pts |
| Q4 14:12 | Illegal Shift on UT Martin, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% MEM +0.1 pts |
| Q4 12:44 | False Start on UT Martin, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% MEM +1.0 pts |
When it happened
Memphis’s chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 15:00 | UT Martin converted 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 30% expectedUT Martin was stopped on 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 41% expected | +0% UTM | UTM: Turnover on downs |
| 2 | Q1 7:32 | UT Martin was stopped on 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 41% expectedP. Laforge made a 30-yard field goalKicks · 87% expected for him | +0% MEM | UTM: Punt |
| 3 | Q2 5:57 | UT Martin converted 3rd & 73rd & 4th downs · 30% expected | +0% UTM | UTM: Touchdown |
| 4 | Q2 4:11 | UT Martin converted 3rd & 83rd & 4th downs · 28% expected | +0% UTM | UTM: End of half |
| 5 | Q2 3:44 | False Start on Memphis, 5 yardsPre-snap flags | +0% UTM | UTM: End of half |
| 6 | Q2 2:42 | Memphis converted 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 47% expected | +0% MEM | MEM: Touchdown |
| 7 | Q2 1:17 | Memphis converted 3rd & 113rd & 4th downs · 30% expected | +0% MEM | MEM: Touchdown |
| 8 | Q4 5:35 | Memphis fumbled and recovered itFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +1% MEM | MEM: Touchdown |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
UT Martin 0% · Memphis 100%
- Final margin
- Memphis by 24
- Luck in points
- 5.1 for Memphis
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Memphis by 18.9
- Replay with same day's form
- UT Martin 0% · Memphis 100% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 3 2026 games ·
UT Martin ·
Memphis
More from Week 3 2026
- Florida International at Florida Atlantic FAU 16–10 · replay 31% for the winner
- Western Michigan at Rice WMU 28–21 · replay 36% for the winner
- East Carolina at Old Dominion ECU 20–17 · replay 54% for the winner
- UAB at Louisiana UL 21–14 · replay 74% for the winner
- Charlotte at App State APP 26–21 · replay 83% for the winner
- Temple at Toledo TOL 49–48 · replay 86% for the winner
- Tulane at Kansas State KSU 31–20 · replay 88% for the winner
- North Texas at Texas State TXST 49–35 · replay 92% for the winner
- Delaware State at South Florida USF 59–17 · replay 95% for the winner
- East Texas A&M at Tulsa TLSA 42–0 · replay 99% for the winner
- UTSA at Texas TEX 30–6 · replay 99% for the winner
- Arizona State vs Kansas ASU 24–17 · replay 8% for the winner