Week 3 2026 · September 19, 2026
UTEP at Michigan, Week 3 2026: who deserved to win?
Michigan beat UTEP 52–17, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, Michigan wins 10 of 10.
Before kickoff Michigan was a 99% favorite.
Final
| 17 | |
| 52 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index 0 Michigan about even · 0 UTEP
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. UTEP wins 0, Michigan wins 10.
- 1 UTEP 3 MICH 16
- 2 UTEP 3 MICH 23
- 3 UTEP 3 MICH 27
- 4 UTEP 0 MICH 28
- 5 UTEP 3 MICH 35
- 6 UTEP 3 MICH 38
- 7 UTEP 0 MICH 38
- 8 UTEP 7 MICH 49
- 9 UTEP 20 MICH 66
- 10 UTEP 0 MICH 55
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
UTEP wins 0% of them, Michigan 100%. The line is what actually happened: Michigan by 35.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| UTEP by 17+ | 0.0% |
| UTEP by 9–16 | 0.0% |
| UTEP by 1–8 | 0.1% |
| Level after regulation | 0.1% |
| Michigan by 1–8 | 0.9% |
| Michigan by 9–16 | 2.5% |
| Michigan by 17+ | 96.5% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- T. Butkowski, 49 yds made · 56% expected
- C. Arreola, 39 yds made · 70% expected
Penalties: UTEP 4 for 25 yards, Michigan 3 for 29 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 11:16 | Holding on Michigan, 10 yards, wiping out the play | 0% UTEP +1.5 pts |
| Q1 7:18 | Offside on Michigan, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% UTEP +1.3 pts |
| Q2 5:53 | Offside on UTEP, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% MICH +0.6 pts |
| Q2 3:11 | Holding on UTEP, 10 yards | +1% MICH +1.2 pts |
| Q3 0:58 | False Start on UTEP, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% MICH +0.6 pts |
| Q4 10:57 | Penalty on Michigan, 14 yards | 0% UTEP +2.0 pts |
| Q4 3:44 | Delay of Game on UTEP, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% MICH +0.4 pts |
When it happened
Michigan’s chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 5:35 | Michigan was stopped on 3rd & 23rd & 4th downs · 63% expected | +1% UTEP | MICH: Punt |
| 2 | Q2 13:14 | Michigan converted 3rd & 73rd & 4th downs · 34% expected | +1% MICH | MICH: Touchdown |
| 3 | Q2 6:58 | UTEP was stopped on 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 37% expected | +1% MICH | UTEP: Punt |
| 4 | Q2 6:12 | Michigan fumbled and UTEP recoveredFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +2% UTEP | MICH: Touchdown |
| 5 | Q2 5:53 | Offside on UTEP, 5 yardsPre-snap flags | +1% MICH | MICH: Touchdown |
| 6 | Q2 5:05 | Michigan converted 3rd & 43rd & 4th downs · 47% expected | +1% MICH | MICH: Touchdown |
| 7 | Q2 3:11 | Holding on UTEP, 10 yardsJudgment calls | +1% MICH | MICH: Touchdown |
| 8 | Q2 0:05 | Michigan converted 4th & 13rd & 4th downs · 76% expected | +1% MICH | MICH: Field goal |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
UTEP 0% · Michigan 100%
- Final margin
- Michigan by 35
- Luck in points
- 9.5 for Michigan
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Michigan by 25.5
- Replay with same day's form
- UTEP 0% · Michigan 100% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 3 2026 games ·
UTEP ·
Michigan
More from Week 3 2026
- USC at Rutgers USC 42–35 · replay 25% for the winner
- Virginia Tech at Maryland VT 35–26 · replay 47% for the winner
- Fresno State at San José State FRES 26–10 · replay 48% for the winner
- Colorado at Northwestern NU 41–7 · replay 65% for the winner
- Purdue at UCLA UCLA 52–38 · replay 79% for the winner
- North Dakota State at Sacramento State NDSU 31–10 · replay 80% for the winner
- Nevada at Middle Tennessee MTSU 27–20 · replay 84% for the winner
- Northern Illinois at Arizona ARIZ 42–17 · replay 86% for the winner
- New Mexico at Oklahoma OU 14–6 · replay 96% for the winner
- Wyoming at Central Michigan CMU 24–10 · replay 96% for the winner
- Michigan State at Notre Dame ND 27–10 · replay 96% for the winner
- Eastern Michigan at Wisconsin WIS 54–10 · replay 98% for the winner