Week 3 2026 · September 19, 2026
Nevada at Middle Tennessee, Week 3 2026: who deserved to win?
Middle Tennessee beat Nevada 27–20, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, Middle Tennessee wins 8 of 10. Nevada had the bounces: pre-snap flags alone were worth 18 points of win probability to Nevada.
An off day for Nevada: it played far below what the matchup promised. In a fresh game against Middle Tennessee it would win 52% of the time; with this day’s form, 16%. The numbers
Before kickoff Nevada was a 59% favorite.
Final
| 20 | |
| 27 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +16 Middle Tennessee about even · −16 Nevada
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Nevada wins 2, Middle Tennessee wins 8.
- 1 NEV 27 MTSU 13
- 2 NEV 7 MTSU 3
- 3 NEV 14 MTSU 17
- 4 NEV 17 MTSU 24
- 5 NEV 10 MTSU 20
- 6 NEV 14 MTSU 26
- 7 NEV 10 MTSU 26
- 8 NEV 3 MTSU 23
- 9 NEV 3 MTSU 27
- 10 NEV 3 MTSU 35
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
An off day for Nevada
It played far below what the matchup promised. In a fresh game against Middle Tennessee it would win 52% of the time; with this day’s form, 16%.
Same teams, fresh game
Replay with same day's form
36 points apart for Nevada: the gap is how differently this game went from what the two teams usually are.
| Unit | This game | Usual level | Better or worse than usual |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nevada offenseEPA per play gained | +0.11 | +0.03 | better by 0.08 |
| Nevada defenseEPA per play allowed | +0.10 | +0.05 | worse by 0.05 |
| Middle Tennessee offenseEPA per play gained | +0.10 | +0.03 | better by 0.07 |
| Middle Tennessee defenseEPA per play allowed | +0.11 | +0.10 | worse by 0.01 |
EPA (expected points added) per play on competitive snaps, turnovers left out because they are valued as luck. Usual level: the team’s earlier games this season plus half of last season, pulled toward the league average. One team’s defense and the other team’s offense are the same snaps, so one game can’t fully say whose day it was; it shows how far this one was from both teams’ norms.
How 4,000 replays ended
Nevada wins 16% of them, Middle Tennessee 84%, counting the 2% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Middle Tennessee by 7.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Nevada by 17+ | 1.3% |
| Nevada by 9–16 | 4.4% |
| Nevada by 1–8 | 8.2% |
| Level after regulation | 2.4% |
| Middle Tennessee by 1–8 | 22.8% |
| Middle Tennessee by 9–16 | 21.7% |
| Middle Tennessee by 17+ | 39.2% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- J. McFadden, 39 yds made · 75% expected
- D. Bourgeois, 47 yds made · 60% expected
- J. McFadden, 20 yds made · 95% expected
- D. Bourgeois, 23 yds made · 93% expected
Penalties: Nevada 5 for 54 yards, Middle Tennessee 10 for 84 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 5:28 | Pass Interference on Nevada, 5 yards | +4% MTSU +2.2 pts |
| Q1 1:34 | Illegal Snap on Middle Tennessee, 5 yards · pre-snap | +2% NEV +0.7 pts |
| Q2 5:37 | Delay of Game on Middle Tennessee, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% NEV +0.3 pts |
| Q2 1:10 | Holding on Middle Tennessee, 10 yards | +4% NEV +1.4 pts |
| Q3 12:50 | Holding on Nevada, 10 yards | +2% MTSU +0.6 pts |
| Q3 12:44 | Holding on Middle Tennessee, 10 yards | +3% NEV +1.3 pts |
| Q3 11:46 | Unsportsmanlike Conduct on Middle Tennessee, 15 yards | +4% NEV +1.6 pts |
| Q3 11:24 | Pass Interference on Middle Tennessee, 15 yards | +3% NEV +1.2 pts |
| Q3 9:31 | False Start on Middle Tennessee, 5 yards · pre-snap | +5% NEV +1.7 pts |
| Q3 9:24 | Holding on Nevada, 10 yards | +2% MTSU +0.6 pts |
| Q3 4:50 | Holding on Middle Tennessee, 10 yards | +8% NEV +2.3 pts |
| Q4 12:25 | False Start on Middle Tennessee, 5 yards · pre-snap | +3% NEV +0.7 pts |
| Q4 11:19 | Pass Interference on Nevada, 12 yards | +6% MTSU +1.4 pts |
| Q4 10:21 | False Start on Middle Tennessee, 4 yards · pre-snap | +7% NEV +1.6 pts |
| Q4 9:48 | Holding on Nevada, 17 yards | +8% MTSU +1.6 pts |
When it happened
Middle Tennessee’s chance of winning
As low as 26% and as high as 100%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q3 14:46 | Nevada fumbled and Middle Tennessee recoveredFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +7% MTSU | NEV: Touchdown |
| 2 | Q3 6:04 | Middle Tennessee converted 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 27% expected | +8% MTSU | MTSU: Punt |
| 3 | Q3 4:50 | Holding on Middle Tennessee, 10 yardsJudgment calls | +8% NEV | NEV: Field goal |
| 4 | Q4 11:19 | Pass Interference on Nevada, 12 yardsJudgment calls | +6% MTSU | MTSU: Field goal |
| 5 | Q4 10:21 | False Start on Middle Tennessee, 4 yardsPre-snap flags | +7% NEV | NEV: Turnover |
| 6 | Q4 9:54 | Middle Tennessee was stopped on 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 34% expected | +6% NEV | MTSU: Field goal |
| 7 | Q4 9:48 | Holding on Nevada, 17 yardsJudgment calls | +8% MTSU | MTSU: Touchdown |
| 8 | Q4 6:33 | Middle Tennessee converted 4th & 13rd & 4th downs · 75% expected | +7% MTSU | MTSU: Touchdown |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Nevada 5% · Middle Tennessee 95%
- Final margin
- Middle Tennessee by 7
- Luck in points
- 4.6 for Nevada
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Middle Tennessee by 11.6
- Replay with same day's form
- Nevada 16% · Middle Tennessee 84% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 3 2026 games ·
Nevada ·
Middle Tennessee
More from Week 3 2026
- Marshall at Missouri State MRSH 30–24 · replay 22% for the winner
- Florida International at Florida Atlantic FAU 16–10 · replay 31% for the winner
- Fresno State at San José State FRES 26–10 · replay 48% for the winner
- Georgia Southern at Jacksonville State JXST 31–27 · replay 67% for the winner
- Coastal Carolina at Delaware DEL 22–14 · replay 72% for the winner
- North Dakota State at Sacramento State NDSU 31–10 · replay 80% for the winner
- Northern Illinois at Arizona ARIZ 42–17 · replay 86% for the winner
- New Mexico at Oklahoma OU 14–6 · replay 96% for the winner
- Wyoming at Central Michigan CMU 24–10 · replay 96% for the winner
- Kennesaw State at Tennessee TENN 42–9 · replay 99% for the winner
- Ball State at Liberty LIB 51–15 · replay 100% for the winner
- UTEP at Michigan MICH 52–17 · replay 100% for the winner