Trust & Will Holiday Bowl · January 2, 2026
Part of this game's play-by-play is missing from the source: the plays on file account for 37 of the 43 points, so the replay rests on the plays there are.
Arizona vs SMU, Trust & Will Holiday Bowl 2026: who deserved to win?
SMU beat Arizona 24–19, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, SMU wins 8 of 10.
Before kickoff SMU was a 56% favorite.
Final
| 19 | |
| 24 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +16 SMU about even · −16 Arizona
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Arizona wins 2, SMU wins 8.
- 1 ARIZ 30 SMU 17
- 2 ARIZ 20 SMU 17
- 3 ARIZ 21 SMU 24
- 4 ARIZ 24 SMU 30
- 5 ARIZ 28 SMU 38
- 6 ARIZ 14 SMU 27
- 7 ARIZ 14 SMU 31
- 8 ARIZ 6 SMU 27
- 9 ARIZ 7 SMU 33
- 10 ARIZ 7 SMU 42
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Arizona wins 16% of them, SMU 84%, counting the 3% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: SMU by 5.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Arizona by 17+ | 1.8% |
| Arizona by 9–16 | 3.4% |
| Arizona by 1–8 | 8.1% |
| Level after regulation | 3.3% |
| SMU by 1–8 | 18.8% |
| SMU by 9–16 | 20.6% |
| SMU by 17+ | 44.0% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
Penalties: Arizona 6 for 60 yards, SMU 6 for 45 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 13:01 | Ineligible Downfield on Arizona, 5 yards | +2% SMU +1.1 pts |
| Q1 8:48 | Offside on SMU, 5 yards · pre-snap | +3% ARIZ +1.5 pts |
| Q1 4:26 | Pass Interference on Arizona, 15 yards | +4% SMU +2.6 pts |
| Q1 3:39 | Offside on SMU, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% ARIZ +0.8 pts |
| Q1 2:55 | Pass Interference on SMU, 15 yards | +2% ARIZ +1.2 pts |
| Q1 2:48 | Personal Foul on Arizona, 15 yards, wiping out the play | +3% SMU +1.7 pts |
| Q2 0:13 | Holding on Arizona, 10 yards | 0% SMU +0.5 pts |
| Q3 12:26 | False Start on Arizona, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% SMU +1.9 pts |
| Q3 2:37 | Pass Interference on SMU, 1 yard, wiping out the play | +1% SMU +9.3 pts |
| Q3 1:10 | Unnecessary Roughness on SMU, 14 yards | +1% ARIZ +1.6 pts |
| Q4 3:45 | Holding on Arizona, 10 yards, wiping out the play | +1% SMU +1.7 pts |
| Q4 2:43 | Illegal Formation on SMU, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% ARIZ +0.3 pts |
When it happened
SMU’s chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 11:46 | Arizona was stopped on 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 40% expected | +2% SMU | ARIZ: Punt |
| 2 | Q1 10:02 | SMU converted 3rd & 113rd & 4th downs · 27% expected | +5% SMU | SMU: Punt |
| 3 | Q1 9:04 | SMU was stopped on 3rd & 83rd & 4th downs · 34% expected | +2% ARIZ | SMU: Punt |
| 4 | Q1 8:48 | Offside on SMU, 5 yardsPre-snap flags | +3% ARIZ | ARIZ: Punt |
| 5 | Q1 4:26 | Pass Interference on Arizona, 15 yardsJudgment calls | +4% SMU | SMU: Touchdown |
| 6 | Q1 2:48 | Personal Foul on Arizona, 15 yards, wiping out the playJudgment calls | +3% SMU | SMU: Touchdown |
| 7 | Q2 13:40 | SMU converted 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 40% expected | +2% SMU | SMU: Touchdown |
| 8 | Q4 0:33 | Arizona converted 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 25% expected | +4% ARIZ | – |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Arizona 24% · SMU 76%
- Final margin
- SMU by 5
- Luck in points
- 0.6 for SMU
- Luck-adjusted margin
- SMU by 4.4
- Replay with same day's form
- Arizona 16% · SMU 84% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here. Part of this game's play-by-play is missing from the source: the plays on file account for 37 of the 43 points, so the replay rests on the plays there are.
Methodology and validation · All Bowl games 2025 games ·
Arizona ·
SMU
More from Bowl games 2025
- California at Hawai'i HAW 35–31 · replay 9% for the winner
- Pittsburgh vs East Carolina ECU 23–17 · replay 19% for the winner
- Virginia vs Missouri UVA 13–7 · replay 22% for the winner
- USC vs TCU TCU 30–27 · replay 34% for the winner
- Arizona State vs Duke DUKE 42–39 · replay 44% for the winner
- LSU vs Houston HOU 38–35 · replay 60% for the winner
- Penn State vs Clemson PSU 22–10 · replay 78% for the winner
- Wake Forest vs Mississippi State WAKE 43–29 · replay 80% for the winner
- Toledo vs Louisville LOU 27–22 · replay 81% for the winner
- Georgia Tech vs BYU BYU 25–21 · replay 82% for the winner
- Navy vs Cincinnati NAVY 35–13 · replay 91% for the winner
- Nebraska vs Utah UTAH 44–22 · replay 94% for the winner