Bad Boy Mowers Pinstripe Bowl · December 27, 2025
Penn State vs Clemson, Bad Boy Mowers Pinstripe Bowl 2025: who deserved to win?
Penn State beat Clemson 22–10, and the replays lean its way: with the same day's form, it wins 8 of 10.
An off day for Clemson: its offense played far below its usual level. In a fresh game against Penn State it would win 54% of the time; with this day’s form, 22%. The numbers
Before kickoff Clemson was a 56% favorite. The biggest swing (Q3, 9:37 left): Pass Interference on Penn State, 15 yards, worth 12 points of win probability to Clemson.
Final
| 22 | |
| 10 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +22 Penn State about even · −22 Clemson
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Penn State wins 8, Clemson wins 2.
- 1 PSU 42 CLEM 10
- 2 PSU 31 CLEM 7
- 3 PSU 33 CLEM 14
- 4 PSU 26 CLEM 10
- 5 PSU 28 CLEM 16
- 6 PSU 29 CLEM 20
- 7 PSU 14 CLEM 8
- 8 PSU 10 CLEM 7
- 9 PSU 10 CLEM 13
- 10 PSU 8 CLEM 21
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
An off day for Clemson
Its offense played far below its usual level. In a fresh game against Penn State it would win 54% of the time; with this day’s form, 22%.
Same teams, fresh game
Replay with same day's form
32 points apart for Clemson: the gap is how differently this game went from what the two teams usually are.
| Unit | This game | Usual level | Better or worse than usual |
|---|---|---|---|
| Penn State offenseEPA per play gained | −0.03 | +0.09 | worse by 0.12 |
| Penn State defenseEPA per play allowed | −0.16 | +0.06 | better by 0.22 |
| Clemson offenseEPA per play gained | −0.16 | +0.10 | worse by 0.26 |
| Clemson defenseEPA per play allowed | −0.03 | +0.06 | better by 0.09 |
EPA (expected points added) per play on competitive snaps, turnovers left out because they are valued as luck. Usual level: the team’s earlier games this season plus half of last season, pulled toward the league average. One team’s defense and the other team’s offense are the same snaps, so one game can’t fully say whose day it was; it shows how far this one was from both teams’ norms.
How 4,000 replays ended
Penn State wins 78% of them, Clemson 22%, counting the 2% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Penn State by 12.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Penn State by 17+ | 30.8% |
| Penn State by 9–16 | 24.9% |
| Penn State by 1–8 | 21.8% |
| Level after regulation | 1.7% |
| Clemson by 1–8 | 12.8% |
| Clemson by 9–16 | 5.9% |
| Clemson by 17+ | 2.1% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- R. Barker, 22 yds made · 96% expected
- N. Hauser, 33 yds missed · 83% expected
- N. Hauser, 48 yds made · 57% expected
- R. Barker, 48 yds made · 61% expected
- R. Barker, 43 yds made · 71% expected
Penalties: Penn State 3 for 35 yards, Clemson 1 for 5 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 6:34 | Illegal Shift on Penn State, 5 yards, wiping out the play · pre-snap | +4% CLEM +2.0 pts |
| Q3 9:37 | Pass Interference on Penn State, 15 yards | +9% CLEM +2.9 pts |
| Q3 9:37 | False Start on Clemson, 5 yards · pre-snap | +2% PSU +0.8 pts |
| Q4 12:51 | Pass Interference on Penn State, 15 yards | +3% CLEM +1.0 pts |
When it happened
Clemson’s chance of winning
As low as 0% and as high as 58%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 13:40 | Clemson was stopped on 4th & 33rd & 4th downs · 52% expectedPenn State converted 3rd & 23rd & 4th downs · 59% expectedPenn State converted 3rd & 13rd & 4th downs · 67% expectedPenn State was stopped on 3rd & 23rd & 4th downs · 52% expected | +6% PSU | CLEM: End of half |
| 2 | Q1 6:34 | Penn State was stopped on 3rd & 253rd & 4th downs · 10% expectedIllegal Shift on Penn State, 5 yards, wiping out the playPre-snap flags | +4% CLEM | PSU: Punt |
| 3 | Q2 6:08 | N. Hauser missed a 33-yard field goalKicks · 83% expected for him | +8% PSU | CLEM: Field goal |
| 4 | Q2 3:42 | Clemson converted 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 25% expected | +5% CLEM | CLEM: Field goal |
| 5 | Q2 0:56 | N. Hauser made a 48-yard field goalKicks · 57% expected for him, 5 of 9 from 45+ before | +4% CLEM | CLEM: Punt |
| 6 | Q3 15:00 | Penn State converted 3rd & 13rd & 4th downs · 73% expectedPenn State converted 3rd & 13rd & 4th downs · 73% expectedPenn State was stopped on 3rd & 123rd & 4th downs · 20% expected | +5% PSU | PSU: Turnover on downs |
| 7 | Q3 9:37 | Penn State was stopped on 4th & 43rd & 4th downs · 42% expectedClemson converted 3rd & 13rd & 4th downs · 75% expectedClemson was stopped on 3rd & 113rd & 4th downs · 24% expectedPass Interference on Penn State, 15 yardsJudgment callsFalse Start on Clemson, 5 yardsPre-snap flags | +12% CLEM | PSU: Field goal |
| 8 | Q4 12:51 | Penn State converted 3rd & 83rd & 4th downs · 28% expectedClemson was stopped on 3rd & 43rd & 4th downs · 45% expectedClemson converted 4th & 23rd & 4th downs · 60% expectedPenn State’s two-point try was good3rd & 4th downs · 46% expectedPass Interference on Penn State, 15 yardsJudgment calls | +4% PSU | PSU: Touchdown |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Penn State 70% · Clemson 30%
- Final margin
- Penn State by 12
- Luck in points
- 8.4 for Penn State
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Penn State by 3.6
- Replay with same day's form
- Penn State 78% · Clemson 22% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Bowl games 2025 games ·
Penn State ·
Clemson
More from Bowl games 2025
- California at Hawai'i HAW 35–31 · replay 9% for the winner
- Pittsburgh vs East Carolina ECU 23–17 · replay 19% for the winner
- Virginia vs Missouri UVA 13–7 · replay 22% for the winner
- USC vs TCU TCU 30–27 · replay 34% for the winner
- Tennessee vs Illinois ILL 30–28 · replay 36% for the winner
- Arizona State vs Duke DUKE 42–39 · replay 44% for the winner
- Iowa vs Vanderbilt IOWA 34–27 · replay 47% for the winner
- Wake Forest vs Mississippi State WAKE 43–29 · replay 80% for the winner
- Toledo vs Louisville LOU 27–22 · replay 81% for the winner
- Georgia Tech vs BYU BYU 25–21 · replay 82% for the winner
- Arizona vs SMU SMU 24–19 · replay 84% for the winner
- Central Michigan vs Northwestern NU 34–7 · replay 89% for the winner