Duke's Mayo Bowl · January 2, 2026
Wake Forest vs Mississippi State, Duke's Mayo Bowl 2026: who deserved to win?
Wake Forest beat Mississippi State 43–29, and the replays lean its way: with the same day's form, it wins 8 of 10.
An off day for Mississippi State: its offense played far below its usual level. In a fresh game against Wake Forest it would win 56% of the time; with this day’s form, 20%. The numbers
Before kickoff Mississippi State was a 58% favorite. The biggest swing (Q4, 10:17 left): Wake Forest converted 3rd & 5, worth 14 points of win probability to Wake Forest.
Final
| 43 | |
| 29 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +20 Wake Forest about even · −20 Mississippi State
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Wake Forest wins 8, Mississippi State wins 2.
- 1 WAKE 60 MSST 17
- 2 WAKE 49 MSST 19
- 3 WAKE 45 MSST 20
- 4 WAKE 33 MSST 13
- 5 WAKE 18 MSST 3
- 6 WAKE 34 MSST 23
- 7 WAKE 38 MSST 31
- 8 WAKE 20 MSST 17
- 9 WAKE 30 MSST 37
- 10 WAKE 24 MSST 42
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
An off day for Mississippi State
Its offense played far below its usual level. In a fresh game against Wake Forest it would win 56% of the time; with this day’s form, 20%.
Same teams, fresh game
Replay with same day's form
36 points apart for Mississippi State: the gap is how differently this game went from what the two teams usually are.
| Unit | This game | Usual level | Better or worse than usual |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wake Forest offenseEPA per play gained | +0.15 | +0.04 | better by 0.11 |
| Wake Forest defenseEPA per play allowed | −0.06 | +0.00 | better by 0.07 |
| Mississippi State offenseEPA per play gained | −0.06 | +0.04 | worse by 0.10 |
| Mississippi State defenseEPA per play allowed | +0.15 | +0.14 | worse by 0.02 |
EPA (expected points added) per play on competitive snaps, turnovers left out because they are valued as luck. Usual level: the team’s earlier games this season plus half of last season, pulled toward the league average. One team’s defense and the other team’s offense are the same snaps, so one game can’t fully say whose day it was; it shows how far this one was from both teams’ norms.
How 4,000 replays ended
Wake Forest wins 80% of them, Mississippi State 20%, counting the 2% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Wake Forest by 14.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Wake Forest by 17+ | 44.6% |
| Wake Forest by 9–16 | 17.6% |
| Wake Forest by 1–8 | 16.4% |
| Level after regulation | 2.3% |
| Mississippi State by 1–8 | 9.2% |
| Mississippi State by 9–16 | 5.5% |
| Mississippi State by 17+ | 4.6% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- K. Ferrie, 33 yds made · 85% expected
- K. Ferrie, 50 yds made · 56% expected
- K. Ferrie, 23 yds made · 94% expected
- K. Ferrie, 36 yds made · 81% expected
- Extra point missed · 98% expected
Penalties: Wake Forest 9 for 76 yards, Mississippi State 6 for 45 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 12:33 | Illegal Snap on Mississippi State, 5 yards · pre-snap | +2% WAKE +1.1 pts |
| Q1 7:12 | Roughing the Passer on Mississippi State, 15 yards | +3% WAKE +1.6 pts |
| Q2 13:19 | False Start on Wake Forest, 5 yards · pre-snap | +2% MSST +0.7 pts |
| Q2 11:26 | Personal Foul on Wake Forest, 15 yards | +4% MSST +1.6 pts |
| Q2 11:26 | Pass Interference on Wake Forest, 15 yards | +1% MSST +0.4 pts |
| Q2 11:26 | False Start on Mississippi State, 5 yards · pre-snap | +2% WAKE +0.9 pts |
| Q2 6:15 | Ineligible Downfield on Wake Forest, 5 yards, wiping out the play | +3% MSST +1.1 pts |
| Q2 6:15 | False Start on Wake Forest, 5 yards · pre-snap | +2% MSST +0.9 pts |
| Q2 6:15 | False Start on Wake Forest, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% MSST +0.5 pts |
| Q3 9:24 | False Start on Wake Forest, 5 yards · pre-snap | +2% MSST +0.7 pts |
| Q3 6:17 | Pass Interference on Mississippi State, 6 yards | +3% WAKE +1.2 pts |
| Q4 15:00 | Delay of Game on Wake Forest, 6 yards · pre-snap | +4% WAKE +0.1 pts |
| Q4 11:26 | Roughing the Passer on Wake Forest, 15 yards | +5% MSST +1.6 pts |
| Q4 4:07 | Delay of Game on Mississippi State, 5 yards · pre-snap | +4% MSST +0.1 pts |
| Q4 2:10 | Unsportsmanlike Conduct on Mississippi State, 9 yards | 0% WAKE +0.6 pts |
When it happened
Mississippi State’s chance of winning
As low as 0% and as high as 66%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 12:33 | Mississippi State was stopped on 3rd & 33rd & 4th downs · 58% expectedWake Forest’s two-point try was good3rd & 4th downs · 46% expectedIllegal Snap on Mississippi State, 5 yardsPre-snap flags | +6% WAKE | MSST: End of half |
| 2 | Q2 15:00 | Mississippi State was stopped on 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 45% expected | +3% WAKE | MSST: Turnover on downs |
| 3 | Q2 6:15 | Wake Forest converted 3rd & 73rd & 4th downs · 35% expectedWake Forest converted 3rd & 73rd & 4th downs · 36% expectedK. Ferrie made a 23-yard field goalKicks · 94% expected for himIneligible Downfield on Wake Forest, 5 yards, wiping out the playJudgment callsFalse Start on Wake Forest, 5 yardsPre-snap flagsFalse Start on Wake Forest, 5 yardsPre-snap flags | +4% WAKE | WAKE: Punt |
| 4 | Q3 6:17 | Wake Forest converted 3rd & 13rd & 4th downs · 78% expectedPass Interference on Mississippi State, 6 yardsJudgment calls | +3% WAKE | WAKE: Touchdown |
| 5 | Q3 0:00 | Mississippi State converted 3rd & 13rd & 4th downs · 72% expectedMississippi State’s two-point try was good3rd & 4th downs · 46% expected | +3% MSST | MSST: Touchdown |
| 6 | Q4 11:26 | Roughing the Passer on Wake Forest, 15 yardsJudgment calls | +5% MSST | MSST: Touchdown |
| 7 | Q4 10:17 | Wake Forest converted 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 43% expectedWake Forest converted 3rd & 73rd & 4th downs · 36% expected | +14% WAKE | WAKE: Touchdown |
| 8 | Q4 4:07 | Mississippi State was stopped on 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 40% expectedWake Forest’s two-point try failed3rd & 4th downs · 46% expectedWake Forest missed an extra pointKicks · extra points are made about 98% of the timeDelay of Game on Mississippi State, 5 yardsPre-snap flags | +5% MSST | MSST: Punt |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Wake Forest 88% · Mississippi State 12%
- Final margin
- Wake Forest by 14
- Luck in points
- 6.5 for Wake Forest
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Wake Forest by 7.5
- Replay with same day's form
- Wake Forest 80% · Mississippi State 20% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Bowl games 2025 games ·
Wake Forest ·
Mississippi State
More from Bowl games 2025
- California at Hawai'i HAW 35–31 · replay 9% for the winner
- Pittsburgh vs East Carolina ECU 23–17 · replay 19% for the winner
- Virginia vs Missouri UVA 13–7 · replay 22% for the winner
- Tennessee vs Illinois ILL 30–28 · replay 36% for the winner
- Arizona State vs Duke DUKE 42–39 · replay 44% for the winner
- Iowa vs Vanderbilt IOWA 34–27 · replay 47% for the winner
- LSU vs Houston HOU 38–35 · replay 60% for the winner
- Penn State vs Clemson PSU 22–10 · replay 78% for the winner
- Toledo vs Louisville LOU 27–22 · replay 81% for the winner
- Georgia Tech vs BYU BYU 25–21 · replay 82% for the winner
- Arizona vs SMU SMU 24–19 · replay 84% for the winner
- Michigan vs Texas TEX 41–27 · replay 93% for the winner