Go Bowling Military Bowl · December 27, 2025
Pittsburgh vs East Carolina, Go Bowling Military Bowl 2025: who deserved to win?
East Carolina beat Pittsburgh 23–17, a result the replays rarely give: with the way both teams actually played, Pittsburgh wins 8 of 10. Luck ran its way: fumble bounces alone were worth 10 points of win probability to East Carolina.
Before kickoff Pittsburgh was a 79% favorite. The biggest swing (Q3, 4:33 left): Return touchdown by Pittsburgh, worth 40 points of win probability to Pittsburgh.
Final
| 17 | |
| 23 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +81 East Carolina very lucky · −81 Pittsburgh
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Pittsburgh wins 8, East Carolina wins 2.
- 1 PITT 34 ECU 0
- 2 PITT 24 ECU 0
- 3 PITT 34 ECU 14
- 4 PITT 20 ECU 3
- 5 PITT 23 ECU 9
- 6 PITT 20 ECU 10
- 7 PITT 31 ECU 24
- 8 PITT 19 ECU 17
- 9 PITT 13 ECU 17
- 10 PITT 10 ECU 24
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Pittsburgh wins 81% of them, East Carolina 19%, counting the 3% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: East Carolina by 6.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Pittsburgh by 17+ | 41.5% |
| Pittsburgh by 9–16 | 20.4% |
| Pittsburgh by 1–8 | 18.9% |
| Level after regulation | 2.9% |
| East Carolina by 1–8 | 10.3% |
| East Carolina by 9–16 | 4.0% |
| East Carolina by 17+ | 2.1% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- N. Mazzie, 51 yds missed · 54% expected
- N. Mazzie, 42 yds made · 70% expected
- N. Mazzie, 33 yds made · 85% expected
- N. Mazzie, 28 yds made · 90% expected
- T. Butkowski, 21 yds made · 96% expected
Penalties: Pittsburgh 3 for 35 yards, East Carolina 5 for 40 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q2 13:04 | Pass Interference on Pittsburgh, 15 yards, wiping out the play | +8% ECU +3.7 pts |
| Q2 11:56 | False Start on East Carolina, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% PITT +0.5 pts |
| Q2 6:33 | Holding on East Carolina, 10 yards | +2% PITT +1.0 pts |
| Q2 1:58 | Holding on East Carolina, 10 yards | +2% PITT +0.8 pts |
| Q3 4:56 | Holding on East Carolina, 10 yards | +4% PITT +1.2 pts |
| Q3 1:09 | Offside on Pittsburgh, 5 yards · pre-snap | +9% ECU +2.3 pts |
| Q4 11:35 | Offside on East Carolina, 5 yards · pre-snap | +3% PITT +0.8 pts |
| Q4 0:13 | Pass Interference on Pittsburgh, 15 yards | +3% ECU +0.6 pts |
When it happened
East Carolina’s chance of winning
As low as 12% and as high as 100%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q2 13:04 | Pass Interference on Pittsburgh, 15 yards, wiping out the playJudgment calls | +8% ECU | ECU: Field goal |
| 2 | Q2 8:35 | Pittsburgh was stopped on 4th & 13rd & 4th downs · 71% expected | +7% ECU | PITT: Punt |
| 3 | Q3 8:17 | Pittsburgh converted 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 22% expected | +9% PITT | PITT: Punt |
| 4 | Q3 4:33 | East Carolina fumbled and Pittsburgh recoveredFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50Return touchdown by PittsburghSpecial teams | +40% PITT | ECU: Touchdown |
| 5 | Q3 3:17 | Pittsburgh fumbled and East Carolina recoveredFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +8% ECU | PITT: Turnover |
| 6 | Q3 1:09 | Offside on Pittsburgh, 5 yardsPre-snap flags | +9% ECU | ECU: Field goal |
| 7 | Q4 11:12 | Pittsburgh converted 3rd & 43rd & 4th downs · 41% expected | +8% PITT | PITT: Turnover |
| 8 | Q4 4:19 | Pittsburgh was stopped on 3rd & 13rd & 4th downs · 72% expected | +9% ECU | PITT: Field goal |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Pittsburgh 29% · East Carolina 71%
- Final margin
- East Carolina by 6
- Luck in points
- 1.7 for East Carolina
- Luck-adjusted margin
- East Carolina by 4.3
- Replay with same day's form
- Pittsburgh 81% · East Carolina 19% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Bowl games 2025 games ·
Pittsburgh ·
East Carolina
More from Bowl games 2025
- California at Hawai'i HAW 35–31 · replay 9% for the winner
- Virginia vs Missouri UVA 13–7 · replay 22% for the winner
- Arizona State vs Duke DUKE 42–39 · replay 44% for the winner
- Old Dominion vs South Florida ODU 24–10 · replay 63% for the winner
- North Texas vs San Diego State UNT 49–47 · replay 78% for the winner
- Penn State vs Clemson PSU 22–10 · replay 78% for the winner
- Wake Forest vs Mississippi State WAKE 43–29 · replay 80% for the winner
- Toledo vs Louisville LOU 27–22 · replay 81% for the winner
- Georgia Tech vs BYU BYU 25–21 · replay 82% for the winner
- Arizona vs SMU SMU 24–19 · replay 84% for the winner
- Navy vs Cincinnati NAVY 35–13 · replay 91% for the winner
- Florida International vs UTSA UTSA 57–20 · replay 95% for the winner