SERVPRO First Responder Bowl · December 26, 2025
Florida International vs UTSA, SERVPRO First Responder Bowl 2025: who deserved to win?
UTSA beat Florida International 57–20, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, UTSA wins 10 of 10.
Before kickoff UTSA was a 68% favorite. The biggest swing (Q1, 9:26 left): Return touchdown by Florida International, worth 11 points of win probability to Florida International.
Final
| 20 | |
| 57 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +5 UTSA about even · −5 Florida International
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Florida International wins 0, UTSA wins 10.
- 1 FIU 27 UTSA 31
- 2 FIU 17 UTSA 28
- 3 FIU 24 UTSA 38
- 4 FIU 13 UTSA 30
- 5 FIU 17 UTSA 37
- 6 FIU 17 UTSA 41
- 7 FIU 17 UTSA 44
- 8 FIU 16 UTSA 48
- 9 FIU 14 UTSA 50
- 10 FIU 3 UTSA 48
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Florida International wins 5% of them, UTSA 95%, counting the 1% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: UTSA by 37.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Florida International by 17+ | 0.5% |
| Florida International by 9–16 | 1.3% |
| Florida International by 1–8 | 3.2% |
| Level after regulation | 0.6% |
| UTSA by 1–8 | 10.4% |
| UTSA by 9–16 | 13.0% |
| UTSA by 17+ | 71.1% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- M. Petro, 37 yds made · 78% expected
- M. Petro, 36 yds made · 80% expected
Penalties: Florida International 4 for 31 yards, UTSA 9 for 113 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 14:13 | Pass Interference on UTSA, 15 yards | 0% FIU +0.1 pts |
| Q1 14:01 | Holding on UTSA, 10 yards | +1% FIU +0.7 pts |
| Q2 13:21 | False Start on Florida International, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% UTSA +0.5 pts |
| Q2 12:30 | Pass Interference on Florida International, 15 yards | +1% UTSA +0.8 pts |
| Q2 12:21 | Holding on UTSA, 10 yards | +1% FIU +0.6 pts |
| Q2 8:41 | Pass Interference on UTSA, 15 yards | +2% FIU +1.1 pts |
| Q2 1:08 | Illegal Forward Pass on Florida International, 5 yards | 0% UTSA +0.3 pts |
| Q2 0:37 | Personal Foul on UTSA, 15 yards | +1% FIU +1.6 pts |
| Q2 0:30 | Pass Interference on UTSA, 13 yards | 0% FIU 0.0 pts |
| Q2 0:20 | Offside on UTSA, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% FIU +0.7 pts |
| Q3 8:51 | Holding on Florida International, 6 yards | +1% UTSA +1.7 pts |
| Q3 7:47 | Pass Interference on UTSA, 15 yards | 0% FIU +1.8 pts |
| Q3 3:27 | Personal Foul on UTSA, 15 yards, wiping out the play | 0% FIU +2.2 pts |
When it happened
UTSA’s chance of winning
As low as 42% and as high as 100%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 13:05 | Florida International converted 3rd & 43rd & 4th downs · 42% expected | +3% FIU | FIU: Touchdown |
| 2 | Q1 9:26 | Return touchdown by Florida InternationalSpecial teams | +11% FIU | FIU: Punt |
| 3 | Q1 3:12 | Florida International was stopped on 3rd & 83rd & 4th downs · 27% expected | +2% UTSA | FIU: Turnover |
| 4 | Q2 13:21 | Florida International was stopped on 3rd & 73rd & 4th downs · 30% expectedFalse Start on Florida International, 5 yardsPre-snap flags | +3% UTSA | FIU: Punt |
| 5 | Q2 10:53 | UTSA converted 4th & 113rd & 4th downs · 26% expected | +7% UTSA | UTSA: Touchdown |
| 6 | Q2 10:02 | UTSA fumbled and recovered itFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +3% UTSA | UTSA: Touchdown |
| 7 | Q2 5:57 | Florida International was stopped on 3rd & 33rd & 4th downs · 49% expected | +3% UTSA | FIU: Turnover on downs |
| 8 | Q2 5:18 | Florida International was stopped on 4th & 43rd & 4th downs · 41% expected | +3% UTSA | FIU: End of half |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Florida International 0% · UTSA 100%
- Final margin
- UTSA by 37
- Luck in points
- 14.2 for UTSA
- Luck-adjusted margin
- UTSA by 22.8
- Replay with same day's form
- Florida International 5% · UTSA 95% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Bowl games 2025 games ·
Florida International ·
UTSA
More from Bowl games 2025
- Pittsburgh vs East Carolina ECU 23–17 · replay 19% for the winner
- Coastal Carolina vs Louisiana Tech LT 23–14 · replay 39% for the winner
- Western Kentucky vs Southern Miss WKU 27–16 · replay 51% for the winner
- Old Dominion vs South Florida ODU 24–10 · replay 63% for the winner
- Troy vs Jacksonville State JXST 17–13 · replay 65% for the winner
- Missouri State vs Arkansas State ARST 34–28 · replay 70% for the winner
- Louisiana vs Delaware DEL 20–13 · replay 74% for the winner
- North Texas vs San Diego State UNT 49–47 · replay 78% for the winner
- Navy vs Cincinnati NAVY 35–13 · replay 91% for the winner
- UConn vs Army ARMY 41–16 · replay 97% for the winner
- Memphis vs NC State NCSU 31–7 · replay 98% for the winner
- Rice vs Texas State TXST 41–10 · replay 98% for the winner