Snoop Dogg Arizona Bowl · December 27, 2025
Miami (OH) vs Fresno State, Snoop Dogg Arizona Bowl 2025: who deserved to win?
Fresno State beat Miami (OH) 18–3, and the replays lean its way: with the same day's form, it wins 8 of 10.
Before kickoff Fresno State was a 64% favorite.
Final
| 3 | |
| 18 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +24 Fresno State about even · −24 Miami (OH)
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Miami (OH) wins 2, Fresno State wins 8.
- 1 M-OH 24 FRES 13
- 2 M-OH 14 FRES 10
- 3 M-OH 7 FRES 10
- 4 M-OH 17 FRES 23
- 5 M-OH 3 FRES 13
- 6 M-OH 14 FRES 26
- 7 M-OH 5 FRES 20
- 8 M-OH 6 FRES 24
- 9 M-OH 7 FRES 28
- 10 M-OH 7 FRES 37
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Miami (OH) wins 24% of them, Fresno State 76%, counting the 1% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Fresno State by 15.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Miami (OH) by 17+ | 2.8% |
| Miami (OH) by 9–16 | 5.8% |
| Miami (OH) by 1–8 | 14.6% |
| Level after regulation | 0.9% |
| Fresno State by 1–8 | 23.1% |
| Fresno State by 9–16 | 25.7% |
| Fresno State by 17+ | 27.2% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- D. Dzioban, 33 yds made · 88% expected
- D. Lynch, 28 yds made · 89% expected
- D. Lynch, 23 yds made · 92% expected
- D. Lynch, 25 yds made · 91% expected
- D. Lynch, 28 yds missed · 89% expected
- D. Lynch, 37 yds made · 77% expected
Penalties: Miami (OH) 4 for 39 yards, Fresno State 8 for 70 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 13:40 | Illegal Touching on Fresno State, 5 yards | +4% M-OH +1.9 pts |
| Q1 7:24 | Holding on Fresno State, 10 yards | +3% M-OH +1.5 pts |
| Q1 2:27 | Holding on Miami (OH), 10 yards | +3% FRES +1.4 pts |
| Q2 4:09 | Personal Foul on Fresno State, 15 yards | +4% M-OH +1.6 pts |
| Q2 2:20 | Illegal Substitution on Fresno State, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% FRES +0.1 pts |
| Q2 1:00 | False Start on Fresno State, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% M-OH +0.1 pts |
| Q3 12:10 | False Start on Fresno State, 5 yards · pre-snap | +2% M-OH +0.8 pts |
| Q4 13:47 | Roughing the Passer on Miami (OH), 14 yards | +2% FRES +0.8 pts |
| Q4 11:06 | Holding on Miami (OH), 10 yards | +1% FRES +1.3 pts |
| Q4 9:33 | Roughing the Passer on Fresno State, 15 yards | +2% M-OH +1.2 pts |
| Q4 9:33 | False Start on Miami (OH), 5 yards · pre-snap | +2% FRES +0.9 pts |
| Q4 2:46 | Pass Interference on Fresno State, 10 yards | 0% M-OH +0.5 pts |
When it happened
Fresno State’s chance of winning
As low as 47% and as high as 100%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 7:00 | Fresno State converted 3rd & 163rd & 4th downs · 20% expected | +7% FRES | FRES: Punt |
| 2 | Q2 8:39 | Fresno State fumbled and recovered itFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +5% FRES | FRES: Field goal |
| 3 | Q2 1:09 | Miami (OH) fumbled and Fresno State recoveredFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +4% FRES | M-OH: Punt |
| 4 | Q3 13:18 | Miami (OH) converted 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 37% expected | +5% M-OH | M-OH: Punt |
| 5 | Q3 10:38 | Fresno State converted 3rd & 93rd & 4th downs · 30% expected | +6% FRES | FRES: Missed field goal |
| 6 | Q3 6:52 | D. Lynch missed a 28-yard field goalKicks · 89% expected for him | +6% M-OH | FRES: Punt |
| 7 | Q3 4:03 | Fresno State was stopped on 3rd & 13rd & 4th downs · 77% expected | +5% M-OH | FRES: Punt |
| 8 | Q3 1:37 | Fresno State converted 3rd & 73rd & 4th downs · 35% expected | +5% FRES | FRES: Touchdown |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Miami (OH) 5% · Fresno State 95%
- Final margin
- Fresno State by 15
- Luck in points
- 4.7 for Fresno State
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Fresno State by 10.3
- Replay with same day's form
- Miami (OH) 24% · Fresno State 76% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Bowl games 2025 games ·
Miami (OH) ·
Fresno State
More from Bowl games 2025
- California at Hawai'i HAW 35–31 · replay 9% for the winner
- North Texas vs San Diego State UNT 49–47 · replay 78% for the winner
- UNLV vs Ohio OHIO 17–10 · replay 80% for the winner
- Toledo vs Louisville LOU 27–22 · replay 81% for the winner
- Central Michigan vs Northwestern NU 34–7 · replay 89% for the winner
- Washington State vs Utah State WSU 34–21 · replay 96% for the winner
- Boise State vs Washington WASH 38–10 · replay 97% for the winner
- Kennesaw State vs Western Michigan WMU 41–6 · replay 99% for the winner
- Pittsburgh vs East Carolina ECU 23–17 · replay 19% for the winner
- Virginia vs Missouri UVA 13–7 · replay 22% for the winner
- USC vs TCU TCU 30–27 · replay 34% for the winner
- Tennessee vs Illinois ILL 30–28 · replay 36% for the winner