Week 1 2025 · August 30, 2025
Charleston Southern at Vanderbilt, Week 1 2025: who deserved to win?
Vanderbilt beat Charleston Southern 45–3, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, Vanderbilt wins 10 of 10.
Before kickoff Vanderbilt was a 99% favorite.
Final
| 3 | |
| 45 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index 0 Vanderbilt about even · 0 Charleston Southern
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Charleston Southern wins 0, Vanderbilt wins 10.
- 1 CHSO 7 VAN 31
- 2 CHSO 0 VAN 31
- 3 CHSO 3 VAN 39
- 4 CHSO 3 VAN 43
- 5 CHSO 0 VAN 42
- 6 CHSO 0 VAN 45
- 7 CHSO 10 VAN 58
- 8 CHSO 0 VAN 52
- 9 CHSO 0 VAN 56
- 10 CHSO 0 VAN 63
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Charleston Southern wins 0% of them, Vanderbilt 100%. The line is what actually happened: Vanderbilt by 42.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Charleston Southern by 17+ | 0.0% |
| Charleston Southern by 9–16 | 0.0% |
| Charleston Southern by 1–8 | 0.0% |
| Level after regulation | 0.1% |
| Vanderbilt by 1–8 | 0.4% |
| Vanderbilt by 9–16 | 1.8% |
| Vanderbilt by 17+ | 97.7% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
No play in this game swung win probability by luck.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- B. Taylor, 35 yds made · 84% expected
- Z. Gordon, 38 yds made · 76% expected
Penalties: Charleston Southern 6 for 64 yards, Vanderbilt 7 for 60 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 8:57 | Illegal Snap on Charleston Southern, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% VAN +0.8 pts |
| Q2 12:51 | Delay of Game on Vanderbilt, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% CHSO +0.4 pts |
| Q2 8:06 | False Start on Vanderbilt, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% CHSO +0.6 pts |
| Q2 2:19 | Holding on Charleston Southern, 10 yards | 0% VAN 0.0 pts |
| Q2 0:17 | Holding on Vanderbilt, 10 yards, wiping out the play | 0% CHSO +5.5 pts |
| Q2 0:11 | Holding on Vanderbilt, 10 yards, wiping out the play | 0% CHSO +2.8 pts |
| Q3 11:03 | False Start on Vanderbilt, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% CHSO +0.9 pts |
| Q3 5:54 | Holding on Vanderbilt, 10 yards, wiping out the play | 0% CHSO +2.9 pts |
| Q3 5:49 | Pass Interference on Charleston Southern, 15 yards | 0% VAN +2.0 pts |
| Q4 12:47 | Pass Interference on Charleston Southern, 10 yards, wiping out the play | +1% VAN +3.1 pts |
| Q4 12:47 | Pass Interference on Charleston Southern, 10 yards, wiping out the play | +1% VAN +4.0 pts |
| Q4 4:44 | Pass Interference on Vanderbilt, 15 yards | 0% CHSO +2.0 pts |
| Q4 4:37 | Tripping on Charleston Southern, 14 yards | 0% VAN +1.5 pts |
When it happened
Vanderbilt’s chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 8:57 | Illegal Snap on Charleston Southern, 5 yardsPre-snap flags | +0% VAN | VAN: Touchdown |
| 2 | Q1 8:39 | Charleston Southern was stopped on 3rd & 133rd & 4th downs · 20% expected | +0% VAN | CHSO: Punt |
| 3 | Q1 6:59 | Vanderbilt converted 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 33% expected | +0% VAN | VAN: Touchdown |
| 4 | Q1 5:31 | Charleston Southern converted 3rd & 13rd & 4th downs · 74% expected | +0% CHSO | CHSO: Turnover |
| 5 | Q1 3:20 | Charleston Southern converted 3rd & 33rd & 4th downs · 50% expected | +0% CHSO | CHSO: Turnover |
| 6 | Q2 2:19 | Holding on Charleston Southern, 10 yardsJudgment calls | +0% VAN | VAN: End of half |
| 7 | Q4 12:47 | Pass Interference on Charleston Southern, 10 yards, wiping out the playJudgment callsPass Interference on Charleston Southern, 10 yards, wiping out the playJudgment calls | +2% VAN | VAN: Field goal |
| 8 | Q4 4:37 | Tripping on Charleston Southern, 14 yardsJudgment calls | +0% VAN | VAN: Field goal |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Charleston Southern 0% · Vanderbilt 100%
- Final margin
- Vanderbilt by 42
- Luck in points
- 2.6 for Charleston Southern
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Vanderbilt by 44.6
- Replay with same day's form
- Charleston Southern 0% · Vanderbilt 100% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 1 2025 games ·
Charleston Southern ·
Vanderbilt
More from Week 1 2025
- Texas at Ohio State OSU 14–7 · replay 38% for the winner
- Virginia Tech vs South Carolina SC 24–11 · replay 51% for the winner
- LSU at Clemson LSU 17–10 · replay 59% for the winner
- Auburn at Baylor AUB 38–24 · replay 71% for the winner
- UT Martin at Oklahoma State OKST 27–7 · replay 81% for the winner
- Syracuse vs Tennessee TENN 45–26 · replay 88% for the winner
- UTSA at Texas A&M TA&M 42–24 · replay 91% for the winner
- Alabama at Florida State FSU 31–17 · replay 92% for the winner
- Toledo at Kentucky UK 24–16 · replay 94% for the winner
- Mississippi State at Southern Miss MSST 34–17 · replay 96% for the winner
- Southeast Missouri State at Arkansas State ARST 42–24 · replay 98% for the winner
- Central Arkansas at Missouri MIZ 61–6 · replay 99% for the winner