Week 1 2025 · August 31, 2025
Virginia Tech vs South Carolina, Week 1 2025: who deserved to win?
South Carolina beat Virginia Tech 24–11, but the replays call it close to a coin flip: with the way both teams played, South Carolina wins 5 of 10.
Before kickoff South Carolina was a 71% favorite. The biggest swing (Q4, 13:36 left): Return touchdown by South Carolina, worth 12 points of win probability to South Carolina.
Final
| 11 | |
| 24 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +49 South Carolina lucky · −49 Virginia Tech
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Virginia Tech wins 5, South Carolina wins 5.
- 1 VT 31 SC 7
- 2 VT 16 SC 0
- 3 VT 20 SC 10
- 4 VT 13 SC 7
- 5 VT 16 SC 14
- 6 VT 19 SC 21
- 7 VT 10 SC 17
- 8 VT 7 SC 18
- 9 VT 3 SC 20
- 10 VT 0 SC 23
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Virginia Tech wins 49% of them, South Carolina 51%, counting the 6% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: South Carolina by 13.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Virginia Tech by 17+ | 12.8% |
| Virginia Tech by 9–16 | 14.3% |
| Virginia Tech by 1–8 | 19.4% |
| Level after regulation | 5.7% |
| South Carolina by 1–8 | 19.8% |
| South Carolina by 9–16 | 14.8% |
| South Carolina by 17+ | 13.3% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- J. Love, 29 yds made · 92% expected
- W. Joyce, 27 yds made · 89% expected
- J. Love, 56 yds made · 49% expected
- J. Love, 39 yds made · 79% expected
Penalties: Virginia Tech 4 for 40 yards, South Carolina 8 for 51 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 11:08 | False Start on Virginia Tech, 5 yards · pre-snap | +2% SC +1.2 pts |
| Q1 10:44 | Offside on South Carolina, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% VT +0.8 pts |
| Q1 8:06 | False Start on South Carolina, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% VT +0.9 pts |
| Q1 3:42 | Personal Foul on Virginia Tech, 15 yards | +3% SC +2.0 pts |
| Q1 0:30 | Offside on South Carolina, 5 yards · pre-snap | +3% VT +1.7 pts |
| Q2 14:48 | Personal Foul on South Carolina, 11 yards | +3% VT +1.4 pts |
| Q2 13:45 | Delay of Game on South Carolina, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% VT +0.7 pts |
| Q2 6:24 | Holding on South Carolina, 10 yards | +1% VT +0.6 pts |
| Q2 1:56 | Offside on South Carolina, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% VT +0.3 pts |
| Q3 4:40 | Personal Foul on Virginia Tech, 15 yards | +5% SC +1.7 pts |
| Q4 13:57 | Illegal Formation on Virginia Tech, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% SC +0.4 pts |
| Q4 3:48 | False Start on South Carolina, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% VT +0.4 pts |
When it happened
South Carolina’s chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 9:17 | South Carolina converted 3rd & 113rd & 4th downs · 27% expected | +4% SC | SC: Punt |
| 2 | Q2 5:55 | South Carolina fumbled and recovered itFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +4% SC | SC: Field goal |
| 3 | Q3 10:57 | Virginia Tech was stopped on 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 41% expected | +4% SC | VT: Punt |
| 4 | Q3 8:09 | South Carolina was stopped on 3rd & 43rd & 4th downs · 49% expected | +4% VT | SC: Punt |
| 5 | Q3 5:42 | Virginia Tech converted 3rd & 23rd & 4th downs · 62% expected | +4% VT | VT: Punt |
| 6 | Q3 4:40 | Personal Foul on Virginia Tech, 15 yardsJudgment calls | +5% SC | SC: Punt |
| 7 | Q4 13:36 | Return touchdown by South CarolinaSpecial teams | +12% SC | SC: Touchdown |
| 8 | Q4 9:45 | Virginia Tech was stopped on 3rd & 43rd & 4th downs · 46% expected | +4% SC | VT: Field goal |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Virginia Tech 5% · South Carolina 95%
- Final margin
- South Carolina by 13
- Luck in points
- 2.2 for South Carolina
- Luck-adjusted margin
- South Carolina by 10.8
- Replay with same day's form
- Virginia Tech 49% · South Carolina 51% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 1 2025 games ·
Virginia Tech ·
South Carolina
More from Week 1 2025
- Texas at Ohio State OSU 14–7 · replay 38% for the winner
- California at Oregon State CAL 34–15 · replay 39% for the winner
- LSU at Clemson LSU 17–10 · replay 59% for the winner
- Notre Dame at Miami MIA 27–24 · replay 70% for the winner
- Auburn at Baylor AUB 38–24 · replay 71% for the winner
- Stanford at Hawai'i HAW 23–20 · replay 75% for the winner
- East Texas A&M at SMU SMU 42–13 · replay 79% for the winner
- Kennesaw State at Wake Forest WAKE 10–9 · replay 79% for the winner
- East Carolina at NC State NCSU 24–17 · replay 81% for the winner
- Georgia Tech at Colorado GT 27–20 · replay 88% for the winner
- Syracuse vs Tennessee TENN 45–26 · replay 88% for the winner
- UTSA at Texas A&M TA&M 42–24 · replay 91% for the winner