Week 1 2025 · August 30, 2025
Duquesne at Pittsburgh, Week 1 2025: who deserved to win?
Pittsburgh beat Duquesne 61–9, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, Pittsburgh wins 10 of 10.
Before kickoff Pittsburgh was a 99% favorite.
Final
| 9 | |
| 61 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index 0 Pittsburgh about even · 0 Duquesne
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Duquesne wins 0, Pittsburgh wins 10.
- 1 DUQ 14 PITT 24
- 2 DUQ 10 PITT 30
- 3 DUQ 21 PITT 45
- 4 DUQ 6 PITT 34
- 5 DUQ 13 PITT 45
- 6 DUQ 10 PITT 46
- 7 DUQ 13 PITT 52
- 8 DUQ 0 PITT 44
- 9 DUQ 13 PITT 62
- 10 DUQ 10 PITT 67
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Duquesne wins 0% of them, Pittsburgh 100%. The line is what actually happened: Pittsburgh by 52.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Duquesne by 17+ | 0.0% |
| Duquesne by 9–16 | 0.1% |
| Duquesne by 1–8 | 0.2% |
| Level after regulation | 0.1% |
| Pittsburgh by 1–8 | 0.6% |
| Pittsburgh by 9–16 | 2.2% |
| Pittsburgh by 17+ | 96.8% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
No play in this game swung win probability by luck.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- M. Marcinko, 35 yds made · 80% expected
- T. Butkowski, 27 yds made · 89% expected
- T. Butkowski, 27 yds made · 89% expected
- Extra point missed · 98% expected
- Extra point missed · 98% expected
Penalties: Duquesne 10 for 73 yards, Pittsburgh 2 for 20 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 12:44 | Delay of Game on Duquesne, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% PITT +0.8 pts |
| Q1 3:55 | False Start on Pittsburgh, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% DUQ +0.6 pts |
| Q2 10:33 | False Start on Duquesne, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% PITT +1.1 pts |
| Q2 10:11 | Pass Interference on Duquesne, 13 yards | 0% PITT +1.0 pts |
| Q2 7:59 | Illegal Substitution on Duquesne, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% PITT +1.1 pts |
| Q2 7:13 | Holding on Duquesne, 10 yards | 0% PITT +1.4 pts |
| Q3 9:10 | Holding on Duquesne, 10 yards | 0% PITT +1.6 pts |
| Q3 7:58 | Holding on Duquesne, 10 yards | 0% PITT +1.6 pts |
| Q3 3:14 | Unsportsmanlike Conduct on Pittsburgh, 15 yards | 0% DUQ +0.7 pts |
| Q4 15:00 | False Start on Duquesne, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% PITT +0.7 pts |
| Q4 14:26 | Delay of Game on Duquesne, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% PITT +0.9 pts |
| Q4 11:15 | Delay of Game on Duquesne, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% PITT +1.0 pts |
When it happened
Pittsburgh’s chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 12:14 | Return touchdown by PittsburghSpecial teams | +0% PITT | PITT: Punt |
| 2 | Q1 2:47 | Pittsburgh converted 3rd & 13rd & 4th downs · 73% expectedPittsburgh converted 4th & 43rd & 4th downs · 42% expected | +0% PITT | PITT: Touchdown |
| 3 | Q2 10:33 | False Start on Duquesne, 5 yardsPre-snap flags | +0% PITT | PITT: Touchdown |
| 4 | Q2 10:28 | Duquesne missed an extra pointKicks · extra points are made about 98% of the time | +0% PITT | DUQ: Punt |
| 5 | Q2 9:24 | Pittsburgh converted 3rd & 13rd & 4th downs · 73% expectedPittsburgh missed an extra pointKicks · extra points are made about 98% of the time | +0% DUQ | PITT: Touchdown |
| 6 | Q2 7:13 | Holding on Duquesne, 10 yardsJudgment calls | +0% PITT | PITT: Touchdown |
| 7 | Q3 9:10 | Holding on Duquesne, 10 yardsJudgment calls | +0% PITT | PITT: Touchdown |
| 8 | Q3 7:58 | Holding on Duquesne, 10 yardsJudgment calls | +0% PITT | PITT: Touchdown |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Duquesne 0% · Pittsburgh 100%
- Final margin
- Pittsburgh by 52
- Luck in points
- 11.3 for Pittsburgh
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Pittsburgh by 40.7
- Replay with same day's form
- Duquesne 0% · Pittsburgh 100% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 1 2025 games ·
Duquesne ·
Pittsburgh
More from Week 1 2025
- California at Oregon State CAL 34–15 · replay 39% for the winner
- Virginia Tech vs South Carolina SC 24–11 · replay 51% for the winner
- LSU at Clemson LSU 17–10 · replay 59% for the winner
- Notre Dame at Miami MIA 27–24 · replay 70% for the winner
- Stanford at Hawai'i HAW 23–20 · replay 75% for the winner
- East Texas A&M at SMU SMU 42–13 · replay 79% for the winner
- Kennesaw State at Wake Forest WAKE 10–9 · replay 79% for the winner
- East Carolina at NC State NCSU 24–17 · replay 81% for the winner
- Georgia Tech at Colorado GT 27–20 · replay 88% for the winner
- Syracuse vs Tennessee TENN 45–26 · replay 88% for the winner
- Alabama at Florida State FSU 31–17 · replay 92% for the winner
- Saint Francis at UL Monroe ULM 29–0 · replay 93% for the winner