Week 1 2025 · August 28, 2025
Stephen F. Austin at Houston, Week 1 2025: who deserved to win?
Houston beat Stephen F. Austin 27–0, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, Houston wins 10 of 10.
Before kickoff Houston was a 94% favorite.
Final
| 0 | |
| 27 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index 0 Houston about even · 0 Stephen F. Austin
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Stephen F. Austin wins 0, Houston wins 10.
- 1 SFA 3 HOU 10
- 2 SFA 2 HOU 17
- 3 SFA 0 HOU 18
- 4 SFA 0 HOU 21
- 5 SFA 0 HOU 24
- 6 SFA 3 HOU 30
- 7 SFA 0 HOU 31
- 8 SFA 0 HOU 34
- 9 SFA 0 HOU 37
- 10 SFA 0 HOU 44
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Stephen F. Austin wins 0% of them, Houston 100%. The line is what actually happened: Houston by 27.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Stephen F. Austin by 17+ | 0.0% |
| Stephen F. Austin by 9–16 | 0.0% |
| Stephen F. Austin by 1–8 | 0.1% |
| Level after regulation | 0.1% |
| Houston by 1–8 | 2.5% |
| Houston by 9–16 | 6.6% |
| Houston by 17+ | 90.6% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- E. Sanchez, 40 yds made · 72% expected
- E. Sanchez, 43 yds made · 67% expected
Penalties: Stephen F. Austin 8 for 60 yards, Houston 8 for 65 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 14:26 | Personal Foul on Stephen F. Austin, 5 yards | +1% HOU +1.1 pts |
| Q1 1:11 | Personal Foul on Houston, 5 yards | 0% SFA +0.9 pts |
| Q1 0:57 | False Start on Houston, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% SFA +0.7 pts |
| Q2 13:41 | Offside on Houston, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% SFA +0.3 pts |
| Q2 9:19 | Pass Interference on Houston, 15 yards | 0% SFA +0.9 pts |
| Q2 8:23 | Personal Foul on Houston, 15 yards | +1% SFA +1.6 pts |
| Q2 5:52 | Pass Interference on Stephen F. Austin, 15 yards | +1% HOU +1.6 pts |
| Q3 12:20 | Offside on Stephen F. Austin, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% HOU +0.7 pts |
| Q3 11:58 | False Start on Houston, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% SFA +0.7 pts |
| Q3 5:24 | Illegal Formation on Stephen F. Austin, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% HOU +0.3 pts |
| Q3 3:35 | Delay of Game on Stephen F. Austin, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% HOU +0.4 pts |
| Q3 1:26 | Delay of Game on Houston, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% SFA +0.6 pts |
| Q4 14:59 | Holding on Stephen F. Austin, 0 yards | 0% HOU 0.0 pts |
| Q4 13:20 | Holding on Stephen F. Austin, 10 yards | 0% HOU +0.6 pts |
| Q4 6:00 | Holding on Houston, 10 yards | 0% SFA +0.6 pts |
| Q4 3:00 | Pass Interference on Stephen F. Austin, 15 yards | 0% HOU +0.9 pts |
When it happened
Houston’s chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 12:59 | Houston was stopped on 3rd & 83rd & 4th downs · 29% expected | +1% SFA | HOU: Punt |
| 2 | Q1 10:36 | Stephen F. Austin was stopped on 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 32% expected | +1% HOU | SFA: Punt |
| 3 | Q1 9:11 | Houston was stopped on 3rd & 23rd & 4th downs · 60% expected | +1% SFA | HOU: Punt |
| 4 | Q1 2:41 | Houston converted 3rd & 83rd & 4th downs · 29% expected | +1% HOU | HOU: Punt |
| 5 | Q2 13:39 | Stephen F. Austin converted 3rd & 33rd & 4th downs · 47% expected | +1% SFA | SFA: Turnover on downs |
| 6 | Q2 12:11 | Stephen F. Austin was stopped on 4th & 23rd & 4th downs · 56% expected | +1% HOU | SFA: Punt |
| 7 | Q2 8:23 | Personal Foul on Houston, 15 yardsJudgment calls | +1% SFA | SFA: Punt |
| 8 | Q2 3:41 | Houston converted 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 25% expected | +1% HOU | HOU: Touchdown |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Stephen F. Austin 1% · Houston 99%
- Final margin
- Houston by 27
- Luck in points
- 10.8 for Houston
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Houston by 16.2
- Replay with same day's form
- Stephen F. Austin 0% · Houston 100% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 1 2025 games ·
Stephen F. Austin ·
Houston
More from Week 1 2025
- Nebraska vs Cincinnati NEB 20–17 · replay 19% for the winner
- Iowa State vs Kansas State ISU 24–21 · replay 31% for the winner
- Auburn at Baylor AUB 38–24 · replay 71% for the winner
- Utah at UCLA UTAH 43–10 · replay 72% for the winner
- Jacksonville State at UCF UCF 17–10 · replay 79% for the winner
- East Texas A&M at SMU SMU 42–13 · replay 79% for the winner
- UT Martin at Oklahoma State OKST 27–7 · replay 81% for the winner
- Nicholls at Troy TROY 38–20 · replay 85% for the winner
- Georgia Tech at Colorado GT 27–20 · replay 88% for the winner
- Hawai'i at Arizona ARIZ 40–6 · replay 90% for the winner
- SE Louisiana at Louisiana Tech LT 24–0 · replay 91% for the winner
- North Dakota at Kansas State KSU 38–35 · replay 92% for the winner