Week 11 2025 · November 7, 2025
Northwestern at USC, Week 11 2025: who deserved to win?
USC beat Northwestern 38–17, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, USC wins 9 of 10.
Before kickoff USC was an 83% favorite.
Final
| 17 | |
| 38 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +6 USC about even · −6 Northwestern
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Northwestern wins 1, USC wins 9.
- 1 NU 28 USC 20
- 2 NU 21 USC 24
- 3 NU 13 USC 20
- 4 NU 14 USC 24
- 5 NU 7 USC 20
- 6 NU 16 USC 31
- 7 NU 16 USC 34
- 8 NU 10 USC 33
- 9 NU 3 USC 31
- 10 NU 14 USC 49
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Northwestern wins 6% of them, USC 94%, counting the 1% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: USC by 21.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Northwestern by 17+ | 0.3% |
| Northwestern by 9–16 | 0.8% |
| Northwestern by 1–8 | 4.3% |
| Level after regulation | 0.8% |
| USC by 1–8 | 10.8% |
| USC by 9–16 | 20.6% |
| USC by 17+ | 62.4% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- J. Olsen, 33 yds made · 82% expected
- R. Sayeri, 22 yds made · 95% expected
Penalties: Northwestern 2 for 26 yards, USC 4 for 30 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q2 6:28 | Ineligible Downfield on USC, 5 yards, wiping out the play | +6% NU +4.2 pts |
| Q2 0:18 | Illegal Formation on USC, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% NU +0.3 pts |
| Q3 9:06 | False Start on USC, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% NU +0.3 pts |
| Q3 7:05 | Pass Interference on USC, 15 yards | +1% NU +2.2 pts |
| Q4 11:24 | Pass Interference on Northwestern, 15 yards | 0% USC +1.6 pts |
| Q4 6:54 | Face Mask on Northwestern, 11 yards | 0% USC +1.4 pts |
When it happened
USC’s chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 2:29 | Northwestern converted 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 42% expected | +3% NU | NU: Touchdown |
| 2 | Q1 0:45 | Northwestern converted 3rd & 43rd & 4th downs · 40% expected | +2% NU | NU: Touchdown |
| 3 | Q2 14:54 | USC was stopped on 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 45% expected | +3% NU | USC: Touchdown |
| 4 | Q2 13:58 | USC converted 4th & 63rd & 4th downs · 44% expected | +5% USC | USC: Touchdown |
| 5 | Q2 11:27 | USC converted 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 38% expected | +3% USC | USC: Punt |
| 6 | Q2 6:28 | Ineligible Downfield on USC, 5 yards, wiping out the playJudgment calls | +6% NU | NU: Punt |
| 7 | Q2 6:05 | USC was stopped on 3rd & 123rd & 4th downs · 31% expected | +2% NU | USC: Punt |
| 8 | Q3 2:39 | Northwestern converted 3rd & 73rd & 4th downs · 35% expected | +2% NU | NU: Field goal |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Northwestern 0% · USC 100%
- Final margin
- USC by 21
- Luck in points
- 5.6 for USC
- Luck-adjusted margin
- USC by 15.4
- Replay with same day's form
- Northwestern 6% · USC 94% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 11 2025 games ·
Northwestern ·
USC
More from Week 11 2025
- Washington at Wisconsin WIS 13–10 · replay 23% for the winner
- Indiana at Penn State IU 27–24 · replay 56% for the winner
- Oregon at Iowa ORE 18–16 · replay 81% for the winner
- Nebraska at UCLA NEB 28–21 · replay 83% for the winner
- Ohio State at Purdue OSU 34–10 · replay 94% for the winner
- Maryland at Rutgers RUTG 35–20 · replay 96% for the winner
- Sam Houston at Oregon State SHSU 21–17 · replay 2% for the winner
- Air Force at San José State AF 26–16 · replay 5% for the winner
- Texas State at Louisiana UL 42–39 · replay 14% for the winner
- Iowa State at TCU ISU 20–17 · replay 22% for the winner
- Wake Forest at Virginia WAKE 16–9 · replay 22% for the winner
- Louisiana Tech at Delaware DEL 25–24 · replay 25% for the winner