Week 11 2025 · November 8, 2025
Wake Forest at Virginia, Week 11 2025: who deserved to win?
Wake Forest beat Virginia 16–9, but the replays lean toward Virginia: it takes 8 of 10 with the same day's form. Luck ran its way: 3rd & 4th downs alone were worth 18 points of win probability to Wake Forest.
Before kickoff Virginia was a 68% favorite. The biggest swing (Q2, 1:33 left): Return touchdown by Wake Forest, worth 17 points of win probability to Wake Forest.
Final
| 16 | |
| 9 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +78 Wake Forest very lucky · −78 Virginia
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Wake Forest wins 2, Virginia wins 8.
- 1 WAKE 19 UVA 7
- 2 WAKE 14 UVA 11
- 3 WAKE 3 UVA 6
- 4 WAKE 20 UVA 24
- 5 WAKE 14 UVA 21
- 6 WAKE 0 UVA 10
- 7 WAKE 0 UVA 13
- 8 WAKE 14 UVA 28
- 9 WAKE 0 UVA 20
- 10 WAKE 0 UVA 24
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Wake Forest wins 22% of them, Virginia 78%, counting the 7% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Wake Forest by 7.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Wake Forest by 17+ | 1.1% |
| Wake Forest by 9–16 | 5.5% |
| Wake Forest by 1–8 | 11.8% |
| Level after regulation | 6.9% |
| Virginia by 1–8 | 24.9% |
| Virginia by 9–16 | 24.8% |
| Virginia by 17+ | 25.0% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- W. Bettridge, 34 yds made · 83% expected
- W. Bettridge, 21 yds made · 95% expected
- C. Calvert, 39 yds made · 73% expected
- W. Bettridge, 40 yds made · 74% expected
- C. Calvert, 50 yds made · 53% expected
- C. Calvert, 49 yds made · 56% expected
Penalties: Wake Forest 5 for 52 yards, Virginia 3 for 15 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 12:33 | Offside on Wake Forest, 5 yards · pre-snap | +2% UVA +1.1 pts |
| Q1 8:40 | False Start on Virginia, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% WAKE +0.7 pts |
| Q1 2:44 | False Start on Wake Forest, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% UVA +0.7 pts |
| Q2 8:33 | Personal Foul on Wake Forest, 15 yards | 0% UVA +1.6 pts |
| Q3 11:50 | False Start on Virginia, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% WAKE +0.5 pts |
| Q3 0:37 | False Start on Virginia, 5 yards · pre-snap | +3% WAKE +0.6 pts |
| Q3 0:07 | Personal Foul on Wake Forest, 12 yards | +3% UVA +0.7 pts |
| Q4 14:19 | Unsportsmanlike Conduct on Wake Forest, 15 yards | +7% UVA +1.8 pts |
When it happened
Virginia’s chance of winning
As low as 0% and as high as 82%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 5:47 | Wake Forest was stopped on 4th & 13rd & 4th downs · 72% expected | +7% UVA | WAKE: Turnover on downs |
| 2 | Q1 1:40 | Wake Forest converted 3rd & 143rd & 4th downs · 18% expected | +7% WAKE | WAKE: Turnover on downs |
| 3 | Q2 1:33 | Return touchdown by Wake ForestSpecial teams | +17% WAKE | WAKE: Field goal |
| 4 | Q3 3:49 | C. Calvert made a 50-yard field goalKicks · 53% expected for him, 1 of 3 from 45+ before | +7% WAKE | WAKE: Turnover on downs |
| 5 | Q4 14:19 | Unsportsmanlike Conduct on Wake Forest, 15 yardsJudgment calls | +7% UVA | UVA: Punt |
| 6 | Q4 9:46 | Wake Forest converted 3rd & 73rd & 4th downs · 29% expected | +11% WAKE | WAKE: Field goal |
| 7 | Q4 7:48 | Wake Forest converted 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 33% expected | +8% WAKE | WAKE: Field goal |
| 8 | Q4 6:21 | Wake Forest converted 3rd & 83rd & 4th downs · 27% expected | +8% WAKE | WAKE: Field goal |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Wake Forest 25% · Virginia 75%
- Final margin
- Wake Forest by 7
- Luck in points
- 12.2 for Wake Forest
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Virginia by 5.2
- Replay with same day's form
- Wake Forest 22% · Virginia 78% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 11 2025 games ·
Wake Forest ·
Virginia
More from Week 11 2025
- Stanford at North Carolina UNC 20–15 · replay 34% for the winner
- Duke at UConn CONN 37–34 · replay 47% for the winner
- Florida State at Clemson CLEM 24–10 · replay 67% for the winner
- California at Louisville CAL 29–26 · replay 74% for the winner
- SMU at Boston College SMU 45–13 · replay 96% for the winner
- Syracuse at Miami MIA 38–10 · replay 99% for the winner
- Sam Houston at Oregon State SHSU 21–17 · replay 2% for the winner
- Air Force at San José State AF 26–16 · replay 5% for the winner
- Texas State at Louisiana UL 42–39 · replay 14% for the winner
- Iowa State at TCU ISU 20–17 · replay 22% for the winner
- Washington at Wisconsin WIS 13–10 · replay 23% for the winner
- Louisiana Tech at Delaware DEL 25–24 · replay 25% for the winner