Week 11 2025 · November 8, 2025
California at Louisville, Week 11 2025: who deserved to win?
California beat Louisville 29–26, and the replays lean its way: with the same day's form, it wins 7 of 10. Louisville had the bounces: pre-snap flags alone were worth 9 points of win probability to Louisville.
An off day for Louisville: its defense played far below its usual level. In a fresh game against California it would win 82% of the time; with this day’s form, 26%. The numbers
Before kickoff Louisville was an 88% favorite. The biggest swing (OT): C. Ranvier made a 49-yard field goal, worth 10 points of win probability to California.
Final (OT)
| 29 | |
| 26 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +26 California lucky · −26 Louisville
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. California wins 7, Louisville wins 3.
- 1 CAL 38 LOU 7
- 2 CAL 24 LOU 0
- 3 CAL 27 LOU 7
- 4 CAL 17 LOU 2
- 5 CAL 13 LOU 0
- 6 CAL 22 LOU 14
- 7 CAL 16 LOU 13
- 8 CAL 21 LOU 24
- 9 CAL 14 LOU 20
- 10 CAL 10 LOU 24
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
An off day for Louisville
Its defense played far below its usual level. In a fresh game against California it would win 82% of the time; with this day’s form, 26%.
Same teams, fresh game
Replay with same day's form
57 points apart for Louisville: the gap is how differently this game went from what the two teams usually are.
| Unit | This game | Usual level | Better or worse than usual |
|---|---|---|---|
| California offenseEPA per play gained | +0.15 | +0.06 | better by 0.09 |
| California defenseEPA per play allowed | +0.08 | +0.05 | worse by 0.03 |
| Louisville offenseEPA per play gained | +0.08 | +0.10 | worse by 0.02 |
| Louisville defenseEPA per play allowed | +0.15 | −0.01 | worse by 0.16 |
EPA (expected points added) per play on competitive snaps, turnovers left out because they are valued as luck. Usual level: the team’s earlier games this season plus half of last season, pulled toward the league average. One team’s defense and the other team’s offense are the same snaps, so one game can’t fully say whose day it was; it shows how far this one was from both teams’ norms.
How 4,000 replays ended
California wins 74% of them, Louisville 26%, counting the 5% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: California by 3.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| California by 17+ | 30.2% |
| California by 9–16 | 21.4% |
| California by 1–8 | 19.4% |
| Level after regulation | 5.1% |
| Louisville by 1–8 | 13.5% |
| Louisville by 9–16 | 6.9% |
| Louisville by 17+ | 3.4% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- C. Meyer, 40 yds missed · 72% expected
- C. Ranvier, 30 yds made · 88% expected
- C. Meyer, 27 yds made · 88% expected
- C. Ranvier, 49 yds made · 57% expected
- C. Meyer, 45 yds made · 62% expected
- C. Meyer, 26 yds made · 90% expected
- C. Ranvier, 39 yds made · 76% expected
- C. Ranvier, 49 yds made · 58% expected
Penalties: California 8 for 60 yards, Louisville 3 for 30 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 11:18 | False Start on California, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% LOU +0.4 pts |
| Q2 6:28 | False Start on California, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% LOU +0.7 pts |
| Q2 5:57 | Illegal Formation on Louisville, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% CAL +0.7 pts |
| Q2 1:47 | Illegal Formation on California, 5 yards, wiping out the play · pre-snap | +2% LOU +1.2 pts |
| Q2 0:40 | Pass Interference on Louisville, 15 yards | +2% CAL +0.9 pts |
| Q3 10:11 | Roughing the Passer on California, 15 yards | +5% LOU +1.6 pts |
| Q3 9:25 | Personal Foul on California, 15 yards | +4% LOU +1.6 pts |
| Q3 5:15 | False Start on California, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% LOU +0.6 pts |
| Q3 3:50 | False Start on California, 5 yards · pre-snap | +3% LOU +1.0 pts |
| Q3 0:28 | False Start on California, 5 yards · pre-snap | +2% LOU +0.7 pts |
| Q4 9:41 | Holding on Louisville, 10 yards | +8% CAL +1.9 pts |
When it happened
Louisville’s chance of winning
As low as 0% and as high as 95%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q2 8:21 | California converted 3rd & 93rd & 4th downs · 28% expected | +5% CAL | CAL: Field goal |
| 2 | Q3 10:11 | Roughing the Passer on California, 15 yardsJudgment calls | +5% LOU | LOU: Touchdown |
| 3 | Q3 3:15 | California converted 3rd & 83rd & 4th downs · 31% expected | +9% CAL | CAL: Field goal |
| 4 | Q3 1:06 | California was stopped on 3rd & 33rd & 4th downs · 46% expected | +5% LOU | CAL: Field goal |
| 5 | Q4 9:41 | Holding on Louisville, 10 yardsJudgment calls | +8% CAL | CAL: Punt |
| 6 | Q4 6:35 | California was stopped on 3rd & 23rd & 4th downs · 62% expected | +6% LOU | CAL: Punt |
| 7 | Q4 3:45 | Louisville was stopped on 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 37% expected | +8% CAL | LOU: Punt |
| 8 | OT | C. Ranvier made a 49-yard field goalKicks · 58% expected for him, 4 of 5 from 45+ before | +10% CAL | – |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
California 95% · Louisville 5%
- Final margin
- California by 3
- Luck in points
- 9.2 for Louisville
- Luck-adjusted margin
- California by 12.2
- Replay with same day's form
- California 74% · Louisville 26% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 11 2025 games ·
California ·
Louisville
More from Week 11 2025
- Wake Forest at Virginia WAKE 16–9 · replay 22% for the winner
- Stanford at North Carolina UNC 20–15 · replay 34% for the winner
- Duke at UConn CONN 37–34 · replay 47% for the winner
- Florida State at Clemson CLEM 24–10 · replay 67% for the winner
- SMU at Boston College SMU 45–13 · replay 96% for the winner
- Syracuse at Miami MIA 38–10 · replay 99% for the winner
- Sam Houston at Oregon State SHSU 21–17 · replay 2% for the winner
- Air Force at San José State AF 26–16 · replay 5% for the winner
- Texas State at Louisiana UL 42–39 · replay 14% for the winner
- Iowa State at TCU ISU 20–17 · replay 22% for the winner
- Washington at Wisconsin WIS 13–10 · replay 23% for the winner
- Louisiana Tech at Delaware DEL 25–24 · replay 25% for the winner