Week 2 2025 · September 6, 2025
Boston College at Michigan State, Week 2 2025: who deserved to win?
Michigan State beat Boston College 42–40, a result the replays rarely give: with the way both teams actually played, Boston College wins 9 of 10. Luck ran its way: 3rd & 4th downs alone were worth 9 points of win probability to Michigan State.
Michigan State won on an off day: its offense played far below its usual level. In a fresh game against Boston College it would win 59% of the time; with this day’s form, 8%. The numbers
Before kickoff Michigan State was a 59% favorite. The biggest swing (2OT): Boston College’s two-point try failed, worth 22 points of win probability to Michigan State.
Final (OT)
| 40 | |
| 42 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +92 Michigan State very lucky · −92 Boston College
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Boston College wins 9, Michigan State wins 1.
- 1 BC 63 MSU 17
- 2 BC 63 MSU 27
- 3 BC 59 MSU 28
- 4 BC 66 MSU 38
- 5 BC 63 MSU 41
- 6 BC 56 MSU 38
- 7 BC 63 MSU 49
- 8 BC 42 MSU 34
- 9 BC 41 MSU 38
- 10 BC 38 MSU 45
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
Michigan State won on an off day
Its offense played far below its usual level. In a fresh game against Boston College it would win 59% of the time; with this day’s form, 8%.
Same teams, fresh game
Replay with same day's form
52 points apart for Michigan State: the gap is how differently this game went from what the two teams usually are.
| Unit | This game | Usual level | Better or worse than usual |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boston College offenseEPA per play gained | −0.35 | +0.06 | worse by 0.41 |
| Boston College defenseEPA per play allowed | −0.23 | +0.10 | better by 0.33 |
| Michigan State offenseEPA per play gained | −0.23 | +0.09 | worse by 0.32 |
| Michigan State defenseEPA per play allowed | −0.35 | +0.07 | better by 0.41 |
EPA (expected points added) per play on competitive snaps, turnovers left out because they are valued as luck. Usual level: the team’s earlier games this season plus half of last season, pulled toward the league average. One team’s defense and the other team’s offense are the same snaps, so one game can’t fully say whose day it was; it shows how far this one was from both teams’ norms.
How 4,000 replays ended
Boston College wins 92% of them, Michigan State 8%, counting the 1% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Michigan State by 2.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Boston College by 17+ | 66.8% |
| Boston College by 9–16 | 14.4% |
| Boston College by 1–8 | 10.9% |
| Level after regulation | 1.4% |
| Michigan State by 1–8 | 4.5% |
| Michigan State by 9–16 | 1.2% |
| Michigan State by 17+ | 0.8% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- L. Lombardo, 37 yds made · 78% expected
- M. Connington, 50 yds made · 54% expected
Penalties: Boston College 7 for 104 yards, Michigan State 6 for 60 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 11:16 | Face Mask on Boston College, 15 yards | +3% MSU +1.6 pts |
| Q1 11:16 | Face Mask on Boston College, 24 yards, wiping out the play | +1% MSU +0.6 pts |
| Q2 10:57 | Holding on Michigan State, 10 yards | +6% BC +2.5 pts |
| Q2 10:57 | False Start on Boston College, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% MSU +0.6 pts |
| Q2 7:45 | Personal Foul on Boston College, 25 yards, wiping out the play | +3% MSU +1.1 pts |
| Q2 5:35 | Personal Foul on Michigan State, 15 yards | +6% BC +2.4 pts |
| Q3 7:12 | False Start on Boston College, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% MSU +0.4 pts |
| Q3 6:55 | Pass Interference on Boston College, 15 yards | +4% MSU +1.3 pts |
| Q3 6:55 | Holding on Michigan State, 10 yards | +10% BC +3.1 pts |
| Q3 6:55 | Pass Interference on Boston College, 15 yards | +4% MSU +1.2 pts |
| Q3 6:55 | Holding on Michigan State, 10 yards | +10% BC +3.8 pts |
| Q3 0:04 | Illegal Substitution on Michigan State, 5 yards · pre-snap | +2% BC +0.6 pts |
| Q4 15:00 | Holding on Michigan State, 10 yards | +5% BC +1.2 pts |
When it happened
Michigan State’s chance of winning
As low as 13% and as high as 100%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 13:38 | Michigan State fumbled and Boston College recoveredFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +6% BC | MSU: End of half |
| 2 | Q1 11:16 | Michigan State was stopped on 3rd & 13rd & 4th downs · 76% expectedMichigan State was stopped on 3rd & 13rd & 4th downs · 75% expectedMichigan State converted 4th & 13rd & 4th downs · 74% expectedMichigan State converted 4th & 13rd & 4th downs · 74% expectedMichigan State fumbled and recovered itFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50Face Mask on Boston College, 15 yardsJudgment callsFace Mask on Boston College, 24 yards, wiping out the playJudgment calls | +5% MSU | MSU: End of half |
| 3 | Q2 12:50 | Boston College converted 3rd & 73rd & 4th downs · 26% expectedBoston College converted 3rd & 73rd & 4th downs · 26% expected | +14% BC | BC: End of half |
| 4 | Q2 5:35 | Boston College converted 3rd & 13rd & 4th downs · 76% expectedPersonal Foul on Michigan State, 15 yardsJudgment calls | +5% BC | BC: Touchdown |
| 5 | Q3 6:55 | Michigan State converted 3rd & 83rd & 4th downs · 30% expectedMichigan State converted 3rd & 83rd & 4th downs · 30% expectedPass Interference on Boston College, 15 yardsJudgment callsHolding on Michigan State, 10 yardsJudgment callsPass Interference on Boston College, 15 yardsJudgment callsHolding on Michigan State, 10 yardsJudgment calls | +5% MSU | MSU: Field goal |
| 6 | Q3 2:17 | Boston College was stopped on 3rd & 173rd & 4th downs · 19% expectedBoston College was stopped on 3rd & 173rd & 4th downs · 18% expectedM. Connington made a 50-yard field goalKicks · 54% expected for him, 0 of 0 from 45+ before | +6% BC | BC: Punt |
| 7 | Q4 15:00 | Michigan State was stopped on 3rd & 183rd & 4th downs · 17% expectedHolding on Michigan State, 10 yardsJudgment calls | +8% BC | MSU: Punt |
| 8 | 2OT | Boston College’s two-point try failed3rd & 4th downs · 46% expected | +22% MSU | – |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Boston College 61% · Michigan State 39%
- Final margin
- Michigan State by 2
- Luck in points
- 3.7 for Michigan State
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Boston College by 1.7
- Replay with same day's form
- Boston College 92% · Michigan State 8% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 2 2025 games ·
Boston College ·
Michigan State
More from Week 2 2025
- Baylor at SMU BAY 48–45 · replay 27% for the winner
- Miami (OH) at Rutgers RUTG 45–17 · replay 46% for the winner
- Illinois at Duke ILL 45–19 · replay 47% for the winner
- Iowa at Iowa State ISU 16–13 · replay 52% for the winner
- UCLA at UNLV UNLV 30–23 · replay 64% for the winner
- UConn at Syracuse SYR 27–20 · replay 66% for the winner
- North Carolina at Charlotte UNC 20–3 · replay 76% for the winner
- James Madison at Louisville LOU 28–14 · replay 77% for the winner
- Troy at Clemson CLEM 27–16 · replay 79% for the winner
- Western Illinois at Northwestern NU 42–7 · replay 80% for the winner
- Michigan at Oklahoma OU 24–13 · replay 84% for the winner
- Virginia at NC State NCSU 35–31 · replay 84% for the winner