Week 2 2025 · September 6, 2025
Cal Poly at Utah, Week 2 2025: who deserved to win?
Utah beat Cal Poly 63–9, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, Utah wins 10 of 10.
Before kickoff Utah was a 100% favorite.
Final
| 9 | |
| 63 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +5 Utah about even · −5 Cal Poly
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Cal Poly wins 0, Utah wins 10.
- 1 CP 13 UTAH 17
- 2 CP 3 UTAH 13
- 3 CP 14 UTAH 28
- 4 CP 3 UTAH 20
- 5 CP 6 UTAH 24
- 6 CP 17 UTAH 38
- 7 CP 13 UTAH 38
- 8 CP 9 UTAH 38
- 9 CP 3 UTAH 38
- 10 CP 7 UTAH 52
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Cal Poly wins 5% of them, Utah 95%, counting the 1% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Utah by 54.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Cal Poly by 17+ | 0.4% |
| Cal Poly by 9–16 | 0.9% |
| Cal Poly by 1–8 | 2.9% |
| Level after regulation | 0.7% |
| Utah by 1–8 | 9.2% |
| Utah by 9–16 | 16.7% |
| Utah by 17+ | 69.3% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
No play in this game swung win probability by luck.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- N. Serna, 30 yds made · 85% expected
- G. Dimauro, 47 yds made · 60% expected
- N. Serna, 51 yds made · 51% expected
Penalties: Cal Poly 4 for 20 yards, Utah 7 for 65 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 10:20 | False Start on Utah, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% CP +0.8 pts |
| Q1 9:45 | Holding on Utah, 5 yards | 0% CP +0.6 pts |
| Q1 8:42 | False Start on Cal Poly, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% UTAH +0.8 pts |
| Q1 8:05 | Roughing the Passer on Utah, 15 yards | 0% CP +2.4 pts |
| Q1 4:07 | False Start on Utah, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% CP +0.6 pts |
| Q2 8:50 | Pass Interference on Utah, 15 yards | 0% CP +2.6 pts |
| Q2 7:09 | Delay of Game on Cal Poly, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% UTAH +0.2 pts |
| Q2 6:26 | Encroachment on Utah, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% CP +0.6 pts |
| Q3 5:50 | Pass Interference on Utah, 15 yards | 0% CP +2.5 pts |
| Q4 11:45 | False Start on Cal Poly, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% UTAH +0.6 pts |
| Q4 11:19 | Delay of Game on Cal Poly, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% UTAH +0.5 pts |
When it happened
Utah’s chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 14:21 | Utah converted 3rd & 43rd & 4th downs · 52% expected | +0% UTAH | UTAH: Touchdown |
| 2 | Q1 9:45 | Holding on Utah, 5 yardsJudgment calls | +0% CP | CP: Field goal |
| 3 | Q1 8:49 | Utah was stopped on 3rd & 43rd & 4th downs · 52% expected | +0% CP | UTAH: Punt |
| 4 | Q1 8:05 | Roughing the Passer on Utah, 15 yardsJudgment calls | +0% CP | CP: Field goal |
| 5 | Q1 7:15 | Return touchdown by UtahSpecial teams | +0% UTAH | UTAH: Touchdown |
| 6 | Q2 8:50 | Pass Interference on Utah, 15 yardsJudgment calls | +0% CP | CP: Field goal |
| 7 | Q2 3:57 | Utah was stopped on 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 47% expected | +0% CP | UTAH: Punt |
| 8 | Q2 2:12 | Cal Poly converted 3rd & 113rd & 4th downs · 20% expected | +0% CP | CP: Turnover |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Cal Poly 0% · Utah 100%
- Final margin
- Utah by 54
- Luck in points
- 2.2 for Utah
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Utah by 51.8
- Replay with same day's form
- Cal Poly 5% · Utah 95% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 2 2025 games ·
Cal Poly ·
Utah
More from Week 2 2025
- Army at Kansas State ARMY 24–21 · replay 19% for the winner
- Baylor at SMU BAY 48–45 · replay 27% for the winner
- Arizona State at Mississippi State MSST 24–20 · replay 47% for the winner
- Iowa at Iowa State ISU 16–13 · replay 52% for the winner
- Sacramento State at Nevada NEV 20–17 · replay 68% for the winner
- Kansas at Missouri MIZ 42–31 · replay 72% for the winner
- Idaho State at New Mexico UNM 32–22 · replay 84% for the winner
- Houston at Rice HOU 35–9 · replay 85% for the winner
- Delaware at Colorado COLO 31–7 · replay 88% for the winner
- Bowling Green at Cincinnati CIN 34–20 · replay 88% for the winner
- West Virginia at Ohio OHIO 17–10 · replay 94% for the winner
- Northern Colorado at Colorado State CSU 21–17 · replay 96% for the winner